CAUSES OF INJURIES AND DEATHS FROM COVID & C-19 INJECTIONS

JOINT COORDINATE/ROUTING FOR NANONETWORKS (CORONA)

Peptide building blocks self-assemble into quantum confined supramolecular semiconductors. These bioinspired functional materials can serve as organic semiconductors. Their ability to connect the semiconductor field and the biological world will facilitate the incorporation of semiconductivity into fundamental biomedical and health care applications.

INJURIES AND DEATHS FROM COVID & C-19 INJECTIONS

MY CONCLUSIONS (after massive scientific research):

1. Covid is caused by the toxicity of nanotechnology. This is why "Covid" has such strange symptoms. Because it's not a respiratory virus. Graphene and other nanotech were used before and during the pandemic.

   It can also be said: covid is not a "virus"; it is a misdiagnosed disease, or a set of symptoms caused NOT by a virus, but by POISONING (toxicity of the substance(s) used, especially graphene).

   With more than 6,000 scientific studies on the toxicity of graphene and its applications, including biological applications, today the mechanism of graphene toxicity is well known.

   This toxicity causes DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis, and leads to oxidative stress. Acute oxidative stress than leads to blood clots, organ failure, strokes and many other injuries, including death. Graphene toxicity can cause acute inflammatory response and chronic injury by interfering with the normal physiological functions of vital organs. Studies on the risks of graphene in the brain show that the use of graphene leads to harmful effects on the development of brain tissue, and abnormal ultrastructure has been observed in the brain. Graphene shows toxicity in the central nervous system and toxicity in the reproductive and developmental systems. In animal studies, pregnant mice had miscarriages at all doses, and most pregnant mice died after high-dose administration late in pregnancy, and offspring development was delayed during lactation. The high dose reduces milk production and delays offspring development. Developmental toxicity of graphene causes structural abnormalities, growth retardation, behavioral and functional abnormalities and even death. Graphene causes lung damage with infiltration of inflammatory cells, pulmonary edema and granuloma formation in the lungs. Graphene induces cytotoxic effects and mitochondrial damage, leads to inflammation, causes DNA damage, reduces cell adhesion and causes apoptosis, or cell death. Graphene inserts itself between the base pairs of double-stranded DNA and disrupts the flow of genetic information at the molecular level, which is the main reason for its mutagenic effects. It is hemotoxic, cytotoxic, cardiotoxic, neurotoxic and harmful to the reproductive system. The sharpened edges of graphene cause physical damage. (Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y)

2. That's why addressing OXIDATING STRESS is key in "Covid" and the injuries caused by these BioNTech (bio nano technology) injections.

3. Also, "long Covid" is oxidative stress and must be seriously addressed before acute oxidative stress causes fatal damage!

4. Nanoparticles can enter the body through the skin, lungs and gastrointestinal tract. This can help create "free radicals" that can cause damage to cells and DNA.

5. There are also concerns that once nanoparticles are in the bloodstream, they are able to cross the blood-brain barrier. https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc.

6. Nanotechnology - a new hazard https://www.ohsrep.org.au/nanotechnology_-_a_new_hazard

   “What are the possible dangers of nanotechnology?

   Although most of the press coverage has been on the dangers of 'nano-goo' such as self-replicating particles that get out of control, or 'nano-robots', the real risks are much more simple, and real. The miniature size of nanomaterials and the way their surfaces are modified to increase the ease with which they can interact with biological systems - the very characteristics that make them attractive for applications in medicine and industry - makes nanomaterials potentially damaging for humans and the environment.

   Nanoparticles are likely to be dangerous for three main reasons:

   1. Nanoparticles may damage the lungs. We know that 'ultra fine' particles from diesel machines, power plants and incinerators can cause considerable damage to human lungs. This is both because of their size (as they can get deep into the lungs) and also because they carry other chemicals including metals and hydrocarbons in with them.

   2. Nanoparticles can get into the body through the skin, lungs and digestive system. This may help create 'free radicals' which can cause cell damage and damage to the DNA. There is also concern that once nanoparticles are in the bloodstream they will be able to cross the blood-brain barrier.

   3. The human body has developed a tolerance to most naturally occurring elements and molecules that it has contact with. It has no natural immunity to new substances and is more likely to find them toxic.

   The danger of contact with nanoparticles is not just speculation. As more research is undertaken, concerns increase. Here are some of the recent findings:

   • some nanoparticles cause lung damage in rats. Several studies have shown that carbon nanotubes, which are similar in shape to asbestos fibres, cause mesothelioma in the lungs of rats

   • other nanoparticles have been shown to lead to brain damage in fish and dogs

   • a German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain (GRAPHENE-BASED “PCR test”: https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

     GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.)

   • inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections. (“masks”: Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879 The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals. Blood-air barrier

     The lungs are a potential entrance for graphene nanoparticles into the human body through airway. The inhaled GO nanosheets can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant (PS) film, which is the first line of host defense, and emerge their potential toxicity. https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and)

   • carbon nanotubes as hazardous for repeated or prolonged inhalation exposure and for carcinogenicity.

   • Such small particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and may move to other parts of the body, including the liver and brain.

   • A major study published in Nature Nanotechnology in May 2008 suggested some forms of carbon nanotubes could be as harmful as asbestos if inhaled in sufficient quantities. 

     Other forms of nanotechnology being developed include tiny sensors called nano-units, of which some simple types are readily available; 'smart materials' that change in response to light or heat; 'nano-bots' - tiny mobile robots that have yet to be developed but are theoretically possible; and self-assembling nano-materials that can be assembled into larger equipment. These are being actively developed. Australia's own CSIRO, for example, has developed a building material that with nanotechnology, is able to repair itself multiple times.

7. The presence of graphene in Covid-19 injections is also indicated by the biodistribution of the Pfizer injection, which is identical for Pfizer products, and the biodistribution of graphene in studies conducted on graphene-based materials: https://pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Pfizer-bio-distribution-confidential-document-translated-to-english.pdf

   https://regenerativemc.com/biodistribution-of-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine/

   https://www.dovepress.com/getfile.php?fileID=64539 “In terms of biodistribution, multiple pieces of researches have been carried out to evaluate distribution of graphene family materials in living organisms. In 2011, distribution of GO was investigated in mice after intravenous injection. The results revealed that although several organs had taken up the GO (188Re–GO) during 48 hours, it predominantly accumulated in the lungs, liver, and spleen, with the minimum amount of deposition in the brain, heart, and bone. Over the next few hours, the concentration of GO decreased gradually in most organs, except for the liver and spleen. Another in-vivo research was conducted to investigate the long-term circulation of carboxylated GQDs in treated mice. The results showed the intravenously administrated nanoparticles mainly are distributed in the liver, lung, spleen, kidney, and tumor sites. Similarly, analogous results of biodistribution were obtained by injecting nanographene sheets into mice.”

8. Another circumstance indicating the presence of graphene in Covid-19 injections is the issue of a process called shedding, described both in the scientific literature on graphene https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120764/ and in Pfizer's clinical trials: https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf page 67-69

9. The toxicity of graphene and other potentially toxic components used, such as heavy metals, is key to establishing a causal link to the adverse effects it can cause.

10. The mere presence of toxic graphene, and similar components, can cause amyloidosis.

    Amyloidosis is also a common complication after Covid-19 injections, as also confirmed by Pfizer documents listing various types of amyloidosis as possible post-vaccination complications in a Postmarketing Experience document: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

    Amyloid arthropathy;

    Amyloidosis;

    Amyloidosis senile;

    Cardiac amyloidosis;

    Cerebral amyloid angiopathy;

    Cutaneous amyloidosis;

    Dialysis amyloidosis;

    Gastrointestinal amyloidosis;

    Hepatic amyloidosis;

    Primary amyloidosis;

    Pulmonary amyloidosis;

    Renal amyloidosis;

    Secondary amyloidosis;

    Tongue amyloidosis; (“Covid tongue”)

11. So, the presence of toxic graphene can cause amyloidosis. However, if the technology used in these injections is also based on peptides (as has been widely reported in the scientific literature: Self-assembling peptide semiconductors | https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aam9756), the production of amyloid in the bone marrow can lead to severe amyloidosis and related complications and death, including the currently manifested so-called sudden death syndrome. The key question, therefore, is also what technology was used in these injections.

    “Short peptides, specifically those containing aromatic amino acids, can self-assemble into a wide variety of supramolecular structures that are kinetically or thermodynamically stable; the representative models are diphenylalanine and phenylalanine-tryptophan. Different assembly strategies can be used to generate specific functional organizations and nanostructural arrays, resulting in finely tunable morphologies with controllable semiconducting characteristics. Such strategies include molecular modification, microfluidics, coassembly, physical or chemical vapor deposition, and introduction of an external electromagnetic field (EMF).

    Self-assembling peptide nanomaterials may serve as an alternative source for the semiconductor industry because they are eco-friendly, morphologically and functionally flexible, and easy to prepare, modify, and dope. Moreover, the diverse bottom-up methodologies of peptide self-assembly facilitate easy and cost-effective device fabrication, with the ability to integrate external functional moieties. For example, the coassembly of peptides and electron donors or acceptors can be used to construct n-p junctions, and vapor deposition technology can be applied to manufacture custom-designed electronics and chips on various substrates.

    The inherent bioinspired nature of self-assembling peptide nanostructures allows them to bridge the gap between the semiconductor world and biological systems, thus making them useful for applications in fundamental biology and health care research. Short peptide self-assemblies may shed light on the roles of protein semiconductivity in physiology and pathology. For example, research into the relationship between the semiconductive properties of misfolded polypeptides characteristic of various neurodegenerative diseases and the resulting symptoms may offer opportunities to investigate the mechanisms controlling such ailments and to develop therapeutic solutions. Finally, self-assembling short peptide semiconductors could be used to develop autonomous biomachines operating within biological systems. This would allow, for example, direct, label-free, real-time monitoring of a variety of metabolic activities, and even interference with biological systems.

    

12. Amyloid self-assembling peptides: Potential applications in nanovaccine engineering and biosensing https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pep2.24095

    Peptide Semiconductor Times Are Coming | Nature Portfolio Bioengineering Community https://bioengineeringcommunity.nature.com/posts/37570-peptide-semiconductor-times-are-coming

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5457452/ “Peptide based nano-assemblies with their self-organizing ability has shown lot of promise due to their high degree of thermal and chemical stability, for biomaterial fabrication. Developing an effective way to control the organization of these structures is important for fabricating application-oriented materials at the molecular level. The present study reports the impact of electric and magnetic field-mediated perturbation of the self-assembly phenomenon, upon the chemical and structural properties of diphenylalanine assembly. Our studies show that, electric field effectively arrests aggregation and self-assembly formation, while the molecule is allowed to anneal in the presence of applied electric fields of varying magnitudes, both AC and DC. The electric field exposure also modulated the morphology of the self-assembled structures without affecting the overall chemical constitution of the material. Our results on the modulatory effect of the electric field are in good agreement with theoretical studies based on molecular dynamics reported earlier on amyloid forming molecular systems.”

13. “In last decade, there has been an increased focus on organic and bio-organic nano-assemblies. Peptide nanotubes, their physical properties, and assembly morphologies are extensively studied due to their excellent biocompatibility as well as functional and structural diversity. Many ordered supramolecular structures have been constructed using peptides as the building blocks. The most extensively utilized peptide-based building block is diphenylalanine (Phe-Phe or FF), which is the shortest bio-molecule known to self-assemble into ordered nanostructures. FF incidentally is also the core recognition motif of the β-amyloid polypeptide, a peptide associated with Alzheimer’s disease1. It can self-assemble into a variety of structures like microtubes, nanotubes2, microcrystals, nanofibers3, nanorods4, 5 and nanowires6.”

    “The potential of these supramolecular structures have been utilized in diverse fields including nanofabrication, drug delivery vehicles7, bio-sensing8, energy storage devices, and hydrogels for tissue engineering”.

    “One of the key challenges in the field of supramolecular chemistry has been controlling the self-assembly of molecules into ordered functional units. Previously, a number of strategies including pH mediated control21, 22, solvent mediated control23, covalent modifications24, vapour deposition25, 26, temperature27, surface28, 29, relative humidity30, symmetry31 and magnetite coating on the surface of nanotubes32 have been employed to regulate the architecture of diphenylalanine self-assemblies.”

    Andrij Baumketner in a recent study, explored the feasibility of using external electric field to disaggregate amyloid fibrils, by inducing folding into an α-helical state reducing their β sheet conformation38. This is especially important because FF is the core recognition motif of β-amyloid segment. Here in this study, we attempt to confirm the effect of AC (Alternating Current) and DC (Direct Current) electric field on diphenylalanine self-assembly using experimental approach.

14. Different assembly strategies can be used to generate specific functional organizations and nano structural arrays, resulting in finely tunable morphologies with controllable semiconducting characteristics. Such strategies include molecular modification, microfluidics, subassembly, physical or chemical vapor deposition, and introduction of an external electromagnetic field.

15. Photoluminescent properties Short peptide self-assembling semiconductors also have intriguing photoluminescent properties. For example, when excited at 255 nm, FF nanotubes show fluorescent emission, with one band at the near-ultraviolet (centered at 290 nm) and the other in the visible region (350 to 500 nm). The FF tubular nanoarrays that form quantum well confinement structures can emit blue fluorescence when excited at 340 to 380 nm

16. JOINT COORDINATE/ROUTING FOR NANONETWORKS (CORONA) https://projects.ics.forth.gr/_publications/CORONA2015.pdf CORONA: A Coordinate and Routing system for Nanonetworks

    “Nanonetworking has become a topic of research interest in different fields. In general, two main trends can be distinguished: the biological or bio-inspired communication modules and the wireless electromagnetic (EM) communication. The first relies on biology as a source of inspiration and exploits biological molecules as information carriers. For example, the information is encoded on several biological molecules (e.g. RNA), which are diffused to the environment [1, 16]. The latter trend, which is assumed in the present work, relies on radiative transfer theory, where wireless communication is based on electromagnetic (EM) waves. Related research efforts so far have been focused on the physical and the Medium Access Control (MAC) definition, where the driving factor of research is the energy efficiency.”

    At the physical layer, early studies show that electromagnetic communication in the Terahertz Band (0.1−10.0 THz) is the most promising approach [5]. The development of an antenna at nano-scale, while keeping its operating frequency at this promising operating spectrum, is proposed to be accomplished by the use of the new ”extraordinary” material called graphene [1].

    A handshake-based MAC protocol, namely the PHLAME, is then proposed on top of RD TS-OOK. During the handshake process the coupled nodes choose the best for their communication parameters. The nanonodes are either connected in a full mesh, or operate by a full-flood example [8]. A harvesting-aware MAC protocol is proposed in [17], which uses a hierarchical cluster based architecture where all nanonodes communicate directly with the nanocontroller in one hop.”JOINT COORDINATE/ROUTING FOR NANONETWORKS (CORONA) This section presents the proposed approach to address geographic routing in nanonetworks. First, we present a technique for assigning addresses in a nanonetwork in the form of a coordinate system. Each nanomachine derives its own coordinates dynamically during the process.”

    “The present study introduced a joint coordinate and routing system for trustworthy nanonetworks (CORONA). CORONA uses distances from user-selected anchor points to define arc-shaped paths among any pair of nodes.”

17. Myeloperoxidase biodegrades graphene https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/08/180823113613.htm

    “Myeloperoxidase is the first and so far only human enzyme known to break down carbon nanotubes, allaying a concern among clinicians that using nanotubes for targeted delivery of medicines would lead to an unhealthy buildup of nanotubes in tissues.”

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/anie.201806906

    Medicinal Herbal Compounds With the MPO-Inhibiting Activity Showing Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammation, and Neuroprotective Effects (A GREAT LIST OF NATURAL ANTIOXIDANTS!) https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.00433/full

18. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6500609/pdf/NEUROSCIENCE2019-7547382.pdf Effect of N-Acetyl Cysteine on Intracerebroventricular Colchicine Induced Cognitive Deficits, Beta Amyloid Pathology, and Glial Cells

    “It can be postulated that NAC might have reversed the effect of intraneuronal beta amyloid protein by acting on some downstream compensatory mechanisms which needs to be explored.”

    https://nationaladdictionnews.com/2021/04/04/study-shows-how-the-nutritional-supplement-nac-can-help-prevent-strokes/ “The study by CHOP researchers suggests NAC may block the precipitation of amyloid plaque deposits, as well as help break up their formation, which could make a dramatic difference for those living with HCCAA.” “Amyloids cannot precipitate without aggregating, so if we can prevent that aggregation with a drug [NAC] that is already available, then we could make an incredible difference in the lives of these patients.”

19. "One of the most experienced free-radical researchers, the Japanese biochemist Yukie Niwa, estimates that at least 85% of chronic and degenerative diseases result from oxidative damage."

    And yes, that's EXACTLY my conclusion!

20. HOW CAN I PROVE A CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THESE INJECTIONS AND SIDE EFFECTS?

    BETWEEN COVID AND ITS COMPLICATIONS?

    WHAT DO ALL ADVERSE REACTIONS HAVE IN COMMON?

    All of these 22 adverse reactions: (https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download), as well as these more than 1,200 vaccine adverse reactions: (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf), as well as complications related to Covid have one common factor that stands at the beginning of each one:

    AND THAT'S OXIDATIVE STRESS.

    OXIDATIVE STRESS IS ONE OF THE TWO MAIN TOXICITY MECHANISMS OF GRAPHENE NANO TECHNOLOGY.

    THIS IS A FAILED IDEA; IT IS A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY TO UNLEASH THIS TOXIC TECHNOLOGY ON HUMANS.

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT DESPITE SO MANY CASUALTIES, THOSE BEHIND IT WON'T STOP PUSHING IT ON PEOPLE, FORCING EVERYBODY TO TAKE TOXIC INJECTIONS, USE TOXIC MASKS AND TESTS, INCLUDING EVEN BABIES?

DID THEY GET OUR CONSENT TO USE THESE TECHNOLOGIES ON US FOR INTERNET PURPOSES, FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND OTHER CRAZY PURPOSES?