An update:
My attention was drawn to the article by Sasha Latypova
She wrote:
“They did experiments on P2 S binding to human ACE-2 receptors and found that P2 S bound to the human ACE2-PD, and an anti-RBD human neutralizing antibody B38 (from Covid-19 recovered patients) with high affinity.
Next experiment was electron microscopy imaging. This is where graphene oxide is mentioned in the set up of the study (p.7):
3.4. Cryo-EM of P2 S For TwinStrep-tagged P2 S, 4 μL purified protein at 0.5 mg/mL were applied to gold Quantifoil R1.2/1.3 300 mesh grids freshly overlaid with graphene oxide. (…)
Apparently, graphene oxide was used to coat the mesh grid holding the spike protein when imaged. (…)
Does this prove graphene oxide in the injections?
NO. It just proves Pfizer uses graphene oxide at Groton labs for CryoEM high resolution imaging sample prep for this study. (…)
All of this is describing the use of graphene as a technical tool for imaging, not as an ingredient in making the injections, or spike proteins that will be injected.
Can graphene oxide still be present in the injection?
YES. It can be. There is a lot of circumstantial evidence for it.
While the Pfizer report is not a direct evidence of GO in jabs, I cannot exclude the possibility that graphene oxide is utilized somewhere in Pfizer/Moderna manufacturing process, perhaps to insulate synthesized spike protein from water/air interface to prevent denaturing. Pfizer is allowed to have ONLY synthetic spike protein in LNP (not mRNA coding for spike) as a version of the product under the same investigational new drug number by the FDA.”
YES, I AGREE WITH THAT, MY MISTAKE.
However, as Sasha pointed out, we cannot exclude the possibility that graphene oxide is utilized in Pfizer/Moderna manufacturing process.
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/tb/d1tb02408f Nano dimensions/adjuvants in COVID-19 vaccines - Journal of Materials Chemistry B (RSC Publishing)
The proposed vaccines contain several different vaccine active principles (VAP), such as inactivated virus, antigen, mRNA, and DNA, which are associated with either standard adjuvants or nanomaterials (NM) such as liposomes in Moderna's and BioNTech/Pfizer's vaccines. COVID-19 vaccine adjuvants may be chosen among liposomes or other types of NM composed for example of graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, micelles, exosomes, membrane vesicles, polymers, or metallic NM, taking inspiration from cancer nano-vaccines, whose adjuvants may share some of their properties with those of viral vaccines.
Instead of wasting time finding out exactly what these toxic ingredients are, we should be offered a clear list of all the ingredients in these injections.
We can't rule out the possibility that graphene oxide is used in the Pfizer/Moderna manufacturing process, but there is certainly more to it than that:
Since we are reliant on guesses as to what is in these injections and what this self-assembly process, we are observing is all about - are they Nanomaterial-based Microfluidic Chips?
https://www.ntno.org/v01p0389.htm Nanomaterial-based Microfluidic Chips for the Capture and Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (ntno.org)
This review aims to provide in-depth insights into CTCs analysis, including various nanomaterial-based microfluidic chips for the capture and detection of CTCs based on the specific biochemical and physical properties of CTCs. The current developmental trends and promising research directions in the establishment of microfluidic chips for the capture and detection of CTCs are also discussed.
For future CTC study, microfluidic chip devices are designed to meet the standards: i) shorter analytical time for CTC capture and detection; ii) enhanced capture efficiency, detection specificity and sensitivity; iii) enhanced capability for sequential analysis after capturing and releasing; iv) enhanced capability in operating procedures for high-throughput. For future development, single cell resolution analysis, e.g. single cell sequencing, single cell proteomics, is essential for CTCs characterization, which has significance in biology and clinics. Furthermore, nanomaterial-based microfluidic chip devices will be performed in achieving point-of-care cancer diagnosis and play an important role in developing personalized therapeutics for cancer patients.
Below is my original post:
STOP THESE INJECTIONS IMMEDIATELY!
I don't know who found this - but this is proof that GRAPHENE OXIDE IS USED IN PFIZER.
Now we should take to court all the so-called "fact checkers", the media as well as the EU EMA, FDA and so on for their LIES claiming that there is no proof that graphene is in these injections or claiming that graphene is not in these injections.
YES, WE ARE BEING INJECTED WITH GRAPHENE AND YES, IT IS TOXIC AND NOT FOR HUMAN OR ANIMAL USE.
https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/
Search: 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 p.7
STOP THESE INJECTIONS IMMEDIATELY!
https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
THIS IS WHY "COVID" HAS SUCH STRANGE SYMPTOMS AS ALI (ACUTE LUNG INJURY), HYPERINFLAMATION, MULTISYSTEM INFLAMATORY SYNDROME, LOCOMOTOR PROBLEMS, ORGAN FAILURE, BLUE TOES, COVID TONGUE, STROKE, ETC....
GO/GS PARTICLES REPORTEDLY CAUSE MORPHOLOGICAL CHANGES AND SIGNIFICANT LYSIS, LEADING TO HIGH HAEMOLYSIS IN RED BLOOD CELLS (RBCS). (!!!!!!!)
The interactions of GO with cells can lead to excessive ROS generation, which is the first step in the mechanisms of carcinogenesis, ageing, and mutagenesis. (!!!!!!)
Mitochondrial damage, DNA damage, Inflammatory response, Apoptosis, Autophagy, Necrosis, Epigenetic changes ….
THIS IS "COVD" AND THE REASON FOR THE ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THESE INJECTIONS
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2021.616888/full Frontiers | Graphene Oxide and Reduced Graphene Oxide Exhibit Cardiotoxicity Through the Regulation of Lipid Peroxidation, Oxidative Stress, and Mitochondrial Dysfunction (frontiersin.org)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138357181830370X?via%3Dihub In vitro cardiotoxicity evaluation of graphene oxide - ScienceDirect
In conclusion, the nano-GO caused cardiotoxicity in our in vitro model, with mitochondrial disturbances, generation of reactive species and interactions with DNA, indicating the importance of the further evaluation of the safety of nanomaterials.
It is not only the injections, but I believe they are adding micro dots with color coding in branded prescription drugs to prevent countfeiting? No one has questioned the harm from these nano dots.
When will our political clowns in DC stop the carnage? STOP THE INJECTIONS NOW! SAVE OUR CHILDREN!
Another take - https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide