THESE ARE NOT PCR TESTS - THESE ARE DEVICES FOR QUANTUM DOTS DELIVERY DIRECTLY INTO PEOPLE’S BRAIN.
THIS IS WHAT “COVID” IS: POISON
https://managainstthemicrobes.substack.com/p/swab-robo-dot-footage-even-dots-have
https://managainstthemicrobes.substack.com/p/a-recap-of-the-march-2022-swab-bot
https://rumble.com/vlruzq-dr.-antonietta-gattis-research.html
“PCR” “TEST” UNDER UV LIGHT
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706753/ INHALATION EXPOSURE TO CARBON NANOTUBES (CNT) AND CARBON NANOFIBERS (CNF): METHODOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY - PMC (nih.gov)
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date.
This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT
instillation and inhalation,
with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to
severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
INSTILLATION!!! This is what "Covid" is!!!!!!!!!! INHALATION!!!
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
Inhalation (masks/spraying), installation (PCR) = “COVID”
https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251 Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions
“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
“Take the experience of researchers at DuPont, who are testing microscopic tubes of carbon, known as nanotubes, valued for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity.
When the researchers injected nanotubes into the lungs of rats in the summer of 2002, the animals unexpectedly began gasping for breath. Fifteen percent of them quickly died. ''It was the highest death rate we had ever seen,''
said David B. Warheit, the research leader, who began his career studying asbestos and has been testing the pulmonary effects of various chemicals for DuPont since 1984.
Early research has raised troubling issues. DuPont and others, for example, found evidence that the cells that break down foreign particles in rodent lungs have more trouble detecting and handling nanoparticles than larger particles that have long been studied by air pollution experts.
Lungs are not the only concern.
Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.
They can also change shape as they move from liquid solutions to the air, making it harder to draw general conclusions about their potential impact on living things. “
A German study found clear evidence that if discrete nanometer diameter particles were deposited in the nasal region (in rodents in this case), they completely circumvented the blood/brain barrier, and travelled up the olfactory nerves straight into the brain (GRAPHENE-BASED “PCR test”: https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y
GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.)
Inhaled carbon nanotubes can suppress the immune system by affecting the function of T cells, a type of white blood cell that organises the immune system to fight infections. (“masks”: Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879 The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can gain access to the brain in exposed individuals. Blood-air barrier
The lungs are a potential entrance for graphene nanoparticles into the human body through airway. The inhaled GO nanosheets can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant (PS) film, which is the first line of host defense, and emerge their potential toxicity. https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and)
carbon nanotubes as hazardous for repeated or prolonged inhalation exposure and for carcinogenicity.
Such small particles can penetrate deep into the lungs and may move to other parts of the body, including the liver and brain.
A major study published in Nature Nanotechnology in May 2008 suggested some forms of carbon nanotubes could be as harmful as asbestos if inhaled in sufficient quantities.
Other forms of nanotechnology being developed include tiny sensors called nano-units, of which some simple types are readily available; 'smart materials' that change in response to light or heat; 'nano-bots' - tiny mobile robots that have yet to be developed but are theoretically possible; and self-assembling nano-materials that can be assembled into larger equipment. These are being actively developed. Australia's own CSIRO, for example, has developed a building material that with nanotechnology, is able to repair itself multiple times.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315221010243/form10-q.htm#V_009
Business Overview
QDs are nanoscale semiconductor crystals typically between 10 and 100 atoms in diameter. Approximately 10,000 would fit across the diameter of a human hair. Their small size makes it possible for them to exhibit certain quantum mechanical properties. QDs emit either photons or electrons when excited. In the case of photons, the wavelength (color) of light emitted varies depending on the composition and size of the quantum dot. As such, the photonic emissions can be tuned by the creation of QDs of different types and/or sizes. Their unique properties as highly efficient, next generation semiconductors have led to the use of QDs in a range of electronic and other applications, in the display and lighting industries.
QDs were first discovered in the early 1980s and the industry has developed to the point where QDs are now being used in an increasing range of applications, including televisions and displays, light emitting diode (“LED”) lighting (also known as solid-state lighting), and
in the biomedical industry.
LG, Samsung, and other companies have recently launched new televisions using QDs to enhance the picture color quality and power efficiency. A number of major lighting companies are developing product applications using QDs to create a more natural light for LEDs.
The biomedical industry is using QDs in diagnostic and therapeutic applications; and applications are being developed to print highly efficient photovoltaic solar cells in mass quantities at a low cost.
In 2019 the Company developed the QDX Ledger, which is based on technology acquired the blockchain-based technology assets of Capstan Platform, Inc. to provide an immutable, scalable and shared data store for consistent tracking and visibility among participants in a product supply chain. The identity and access credentials of participants, be they individuals, corporations or machines is also secured on the platform, providing mechanisms to control and restrict the supply of products as might be required by regulatory mandates and socially conscious business practices.
QDX Quantum Dots can be incorporated into almost any physical product so that its authenticity can be verified and tracked from point of manufacture through to sale to an end customer. Unlike existing approaches to establishing product identity, including QR code stickers and RFID tags, we believe that QDX Quantum Dots are more tamper proof, resistant to environmental extremes and low cost.
We believe that
they may be incorporated into products as diverse as auto parts, consumer electronics, apparel and luxury fashion accessories, industrial IoT devices, bank notes and even liquids, such as gasoline and lubricants.
In early 2020 and in the advent of the Covid 19 pandemic,
the company recognized a need for a secure method for the validation and reporting of the Covid 19 testing process.
The Company leveraged its existing QDX Ledger platform technology to launch the QDX HealthID later rebranded the QMC HealthID and is operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of Quantum Materials Corp.
Major Market Segments
Life Sciences. The life sciences industry was one of the early areas of adoption of QD technology, especially for
QDs used in fluorescent markers in diagnostic applications.
This includes both the in vitro use of QDs for marking (illuminating) particular cell types or metabolic processes for understanding diseases, and in vivo imaging made possible by QD fluorescence in near infrared that can be detected in deep tissues.
The fluorescent qualities of QDs provide an attractive alternative to traditional organic dyes in bio-imaging. It is estimated that QDs are 20 times brighter and 100 times more stable than standard fluorescent indicators.
QD technology is also being used in place of colloidal gold nanoparticles in lateral flow test kits such as those used in the rapid Covid 19 antigen test.
QDs have been reported in literature to exponential improve the sensitivity of these test enabling earlier detection.
The Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”) has issued emergency use authorization (“EUA”) for medical tests that diagnose Covid-19. The FDA is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring safety, efficacy, and security of all human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices. With regards to medical tests, the FDA usually does this by making manufacturers meet rigorous guidelines in an approval process that can take many months.
During an emergency, such as a pandemic, it may not be possible to have all the evidence that the FDA would usually have before approving a medical test.
If there’s evidence that strongly suggests that patients have benefited from a test, the agency can issue an EUA to make it available.
One of the minimum requirements for granting EUA is that the known and potential benefits of the test outweigh the known potential risks. However, this is a minimum requirement and not the standard.
The minimum standard can be met and EUA is still not given; there may be additional requirements, such as the test meeting
reasonable thresholds for safety and effectiveness and/or people in urgent need of care based on a diagnosis.
EUAs are only given during a declared emergency; outside of this, an EUA is never given.
Once the pandemic is over and should FDA EUA of Covid-19 tests be revoked. The 510K approval process which requires validation and submission of the test for FDA 510(k) clearance, which is one of the normally used medical device regulatory pathways for FDA approval would be required to continue to sell the test kits in the USA.
It is important to note that QMC is collaborating with a leading university in the medical field and intends to initially pursue the FDA EUA while also pursuing the FDA 510(k) clearance of its test platform for non-covid related testing. QMC also intends to pursue regulatory approvals in one or more foreign jurisdictions.
U.S.-based quantum dot producer QMC (Quantum Materials Corp) declared its blockchain-based QDX HealthID for transparency in disease testing and immunization for infectious diseases. The aim is to assure the authenticity of health data and aid individuals to re-join the workforce soon.
Quantum dots are nanoparticles made up of semiconductor materials that transmit various colors when illuminated by light. This color depends on their dimension and the way they were produced. QMC has built a track and trace solution utilizing quantum dots and blockchain to confirm the creation of products and counterfeiting.
The authentication solution is blended with QDX HealthID for
monitoring and tracking
the mutinies of diseases, like the COVID-19. The solution validates individuals being tested, the persons conducting the test, and the test kits.
In more simplistic terms, QDX HealthID warrants that testing data is safe and not tampered with. Recently, health reports and medical certificates are being issued on paper, which makes them simple to forge.
“Not only does this service facilitate improved health outcomes for patients, but it also underpins back-to-work certifications, sometimes referred to as immunization passports,” said Stephen B. Squires, President & CEO of QMC in a statement.
With the health data supported by blockchain, governments and health agencies can form new plans and security measures to hold the spread of COVID-19 and other diseases.
Additionally, individual users can evaluate their immunization passport, utilizing a mobile application. The app highlights color-coded indicators — yellow, green, and red. If the app displays the green indicator, the individual has the authorization to interact in social and work environments. This indicator can be bestowed and authenticated by others utilizing a QR code.
“The world must have a system that eliminates the fears and anxiety of not knowing who is able to return to work,” said Les Paull, CEO of QMVT, the unit responsible for sales and marketing of QMC’s innovations in a statement.
The solution is hosted on the Microsoft Azure cloud and can combine with existing EMR systems. It is based on the Hyperledger Sawtooth enterprise blockchain, and for smart contracts, it’s applying the DAML (Digital Asset Modeling Language).
https://www.courthousenews.com/eu-president-lays-out-vision-for-a-greener-stronger-europe/
“We must make this Europe’s digital decade,” she said. “Europe must now lead the way on digital – or it will have to follow the way of others, who are setting these standards for us.”
Privacy issues are taking center stage too in Europe and the EU is in a major battle with American tech giants over control of data,
a core source of new wealth for businesses.
To the end of protecting Europeans' data, she said the commission will propose setting up a system whereby
EU citizens can obtain “a secure European e-identity”
that allows them to control how their personal data is used whenever they “do anything from paying your taxes to renting a bicycle.”
She added: “We want to lead the way, the European way, to the Digital Age: based on our values, our strength, our global ambitions.”
HOW ABOUT NO?
SHE MUST RESIGN AND ANSWER FOR THIS GENOCIDE!
http://web.archive.org/web/20210227025421/https://www.grapheal.com/about-our-solution The solution TestNPass | Grapheal
“OUR MISSION IS TO BUILD A NEW GENERATION OF DIGITAL BIOSENSORS TO REMOTEDLY DIAGNOSE AND MONITOR PATIENTS.”
GRAPHENE FAMILY NANOPARTICLES can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection. GFNs can induce acute and chronic injuries in tissues by penetrating through the blood-air barrier, blood-testis barrier, blood-brain barrier, and blood-placenta barrier etc. and accumulating in the lung, liver, and spleen etc. For example, some graphene nanomaterials aerosols can be inhaled and substantial deposition in the respiratory tract, and
they can easily penetrate through the tracheobronchial airways and then transit down to the lower lung airways, resulting in the subsequent formation of granulomas, lung fibrosis and adverse health effects to exposed persons.
👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆👆
COVID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Administration route
The common administration routes include airway exposure (intranasal insufflation, intratracheal instillation, and inhalation), oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.
Blood-air barrier
The lungs are a potential entrance for graphene nanoparticles into the human body through airway. The inhaled GO nanosheets can destroy the ultrastructure and biophysical properties of pulmonary surfactant (PS) film, which is the first line of host defense, and emerge their potential toxicity. The agglomerated or dispersed particles deposit on the inner alveolar surface within the alveoli and then be engulfed by alveolar macrophages (AMs).
Intratracheally instilled graphene can redistribute to the liver and spleen by passing through the air-blood barrier.
Blood-brain barrier
In addition, graphene quantum dots (GQDs), with a small size of less than 100 nm, can cross through the blood-brain barrier.
Blood-placenta barrier
A recent review suggested that the placenta does not provide a tight barrier against the transfer of nanoparticles to foetuses, specifically against the distribution of carbonaceous nanoparticles to and in the foetus.
Much attention had been paid to the developmental toxicity of nanomaterials, and reports showed that
many nanoparticles did cross the placental barrier and strongly influenced the development of embryos. !!!!!!!!!!
Distribution OF GFNs
The different administration routes influence the distribution of GFNs, for example, intratracheally instilled FLG passing through the air-blood barrier mainly accumulated and was retained in the lungs, with 47 % remaining after 4 weeks.
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) face mask filters and respirator filters (https://www.graphene-info.com/israeli-researchers-develop-graphene-based-self-sterilizing-air-filter, https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/versatile-graphene-underlies-new-covid-zapping-air-filter/, https://medium.com/edge-of-innovation/how-safe-are-graphene-based-face-masks-b88740547e8c, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=38205)
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) personal protective equipment
nanomaterial-based biosensors, including PCR tests (https://news.mit.edu/2021/carbon-nanotube-covid-detect-1026, https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676, https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/,https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892)
drugs and vaccines
CRIME SCHEME:
PEOPLE WERE POISONED WITH NANOTECHNOLOGY - IN MASKS, TESTS, FILTERS, INJECTIONS (INCLUDING FLU SHOTS), FOOD, PACKAGING, CHEMTRAILS/SPRAYS, DRUGS, ETC. THAT'S WHY THEY SUFFOCATED, HAD LOW SATURATION = ACUTE OXIDATIVE STRESS CAUSED BY FREE RADICALS DUE TO THE POISON (NANOTECHNOLOGY).
INSTEAD OF RECEIVING ANTIOXIDANTS, THEY WERE FURTHER POISONED WITH TOXIC DRUGS, CONTAINING NANOTECHNOLOGY -
THAT IS WHY THEY WERE DENIED IVERMECTIN, HCQ, QUERCETIN, ZINC, NAC…
TO GET A MIRACLE "VACCINE" FULL OF NANOTECHNOLOGY
WHILE THE FULL CONTENTS OF THESE INJECTIONS AND ANTIDOTE/S ARE HIDDEN FROM THEM.
THIS IS MURDER
AND BY THE WAY:
https://www.politico.eu/article/5-things-to-know-about-ursula-von-der-leyens-pfizergate-court-cases/
The EU high court’s decision on access to text messages between Ursula von der Leyen and Albert Bourla is set to drop not long before the European elections.
Ursula von der Leyen’s lips have been sealed for more than two years.
But that doesn’t make the question any less interesting: What exactly was in the text messages she reportedly exchanged with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla in advance of the EU signing its biggest COVID vaccine contract with the company?
While the Commission president might wish the topic would go away, it matters — and not only because this brings up legitimate concerns about how the vaccine contract was negotiated, especially since the number of doses skyrocketed and the price per jab jumped by a reported 25 percent.
It also raises the issue of whether commissioners’ text messages are part of official communications, to be stored and accessed in the same way as other documents.
In early 2024, we will get an answer, with Europe’s highest court set to rule on a lawsuit brought by the New York Times against the European Commission for failing to provide access to the text messages.
"The public continues to be denied information about the terms of one of the biggest procurement contracts in the history of the EU,” said Nicole Taylor, a New York Times spokesperson. ”Public officials should not be able to avoid oversight by failing to preserve information, or by using alternate forms of communication to avoid disclosure," she added.
The case raises tantalizing questions. Will we finally get to see the texts? What will it mean for commissioners’ private messages going forward? And how will this play out politically for von der Leyen, coming as it will just months before the European election?
Here are five things you need to know.
1. The New York Times has a good chance of winning
Chances of success for the New York Times are high, said Yoann Boubacir, a lawyer and expert in European law, pointing to a 2001 EU regulation that says EU citizens should have the right to access "any content whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form, sound, visual or audiovisual recording)." That could very well include texts….
Even if the Commission wins, von der Leyen isn’t out of the legal woods
Beyond the New York Times decision,
three other cases related to the EU’s vaccine contracts are still pending.
The European Public Prosecutor’s Office — the role of which is to investigate, prosecute and bring to judgment "crimes against the financial interests of the EU" — has an open investigation into the EU's vaccine purchases, details of which have not been made public. An EPPO official said prosecutors are hoping to wrap up the case by the end of this year.
Belgian lobbyist Frédéric Baldan filed a criminal complaint in Belgium against von der Leyen in April, which includes charges of corruption and destruction of documents. The lawyer who represents him, Diane Protat, also represents a vaccine-skeptic French organization called BonSens, which has previously lobbied against the COVID-19 response.
BonSens announced it has also launched legal action in the United States and in France; in the U.S. to obtain the text messages and in France to nullify the COVID-19 vaccine contracts between the EU and Pfizer.
So despite sealed lips, it looks like questions around vaccine negotiations won’t be going away any time soon.
I love the name of this substack - Outraged Human. That actually made me laugh out loud tonight. If you're not outraged, you need to check your pulse!
Great self study and linkage of articles. Thanks for featuring my work too. Keep on it. Thanks for sending the links too.