Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bacca400's avatar

Hello again. It would be helpful if you could put a divider between each study. It's not very clear where one study ends and another begins. When editing an article the divider is on the far right of the edit icons, on the More menu. Thanks!

Expand full comment
David Watson's avatar

Good report. The main problem is uncertainty of what the thresholds are for how much damage is irreversible, so the effects can't be corrected by innate repair mechanisms or supplements. Low levels can apparently be absorbed with little or no permanent effects. Higher exposures can cause cell damage and malfunctions we can't easily correct, inducing the listed ailments and probably others. The same corrupt medical industrial complex that has poisoned much of the population with the criminal vax, and prohibited treatments, is also suppressing the risks and the treatment of the prolific radiation sources. Those who are worried about 5g should have been just as worried about 4g and all the others, and the constant bombardment from wifi, ear buds, power lines, satellites, even home electrical systems and devices.

A first step in understanding our risks is to begin measuring emissions in our environments. I've been studying this recently, and have written a couple of articles (so far) on my progress on my stack. Like the poison vax, well need a lot more people getting injured, and a lot more knowledgeable people to sound the alarms. Until then, we can expect a progression of changes in humanity.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts