VARIOUS INFORMATION

PART ONE

Here are two posts (part one and part two) - a collection of various information about C-19 injections, masks, testing and other related issues.

PART ONE

STOP THE GENOCIDE NOW!

THESE ARE NOT VACCINATIONS, BUT INJECTIONS OF TOXIC NANOTECHNOLOGY.

THESE ARE NOT MASKS, BUT INHALATIONS OF TOXIC NANOTECHNOLOGY.

THESE ARE NOT TESTS; THEY ARE INSTILLATIONS OF TOXIC NANOTECHNOLOGY.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects

---

A SHOCKING 2014 STUDY:

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-014-0059-z The carcinogenic effect of various multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) after intraperitoneal injection in rats | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

All MWCNTs tested in this study showed a strong carcinogenic effect. Besides the diameter and length of MWCNTs, curvature seems to have had an influence on carcinogenic potency.

---

CONFIDENTIAL PFIZER DOCUMENTS

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) attempted to delay for 75 years the release of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine safety data, based on which the FDA granted emergency approval, at the request of Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency "PHMPT" IR0546-FDA-Pfizer-Approval-FINAL.pdf (phmpt.org).

The product was AUTHORIZED by the FDA on December 11, 2020, after only 108 days of testing its safety. However, in early January 2022, Texas federal judge Mark Pittman ordered the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to publicly disclose the data it relied on in granting this conditional approval for Pfizer's product.

https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents/

One of the documents made public in this way is "Reissue_5.3.6 Postmarketing Experience.pdf" (https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf) It is dated Feb. 28, 2021. Page 30 of this confidential document contains data on adverse effects that Pfizer intended to track to see if they show up on its radar as reactions to their COVID-19 formulation.

The nine A4 pages long list of complications, is a list of ADVERSE EFFECTS associated with severe reactions to their COVID-19 vaccine "and to vaccines in general."

Among the complications listed here are extremely severe conditions such as 1p36 deletion syndrome (a chromosome deletion causing severe intellectual disability), acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, autoimmune diseases, epilepsy, paralysis, multiple sclerosis, myocarditis, miscarriages, and deaths. The list of complications is long.

Pfizer and the FDA also knew that the product would cause so-called Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease.

Other data emerging from the document indicates that

the lipid nanoparticles spread throughout the body. Their biodistribution in the liver, ovaries and other vital organs 48 hours after injection is extremely worrisome.

(125742_S1_M4_4223_185350.pdf (phmpt.org)

Shockingly, Pfizer's declassified documents also lack data on the 25,706 patients who participated in this clinical trial.

A lawsuit is currently pending against Pfizer, sued by whistleblower Brook Jackson. Jackson was an employee of Ventavia, a company that performed some of the clinical trials on Pfizer's behalf. In that lawsuit, Jackson, in her complaint against Pfizer, presented more than 400 pieces of evidence of poor clinical practices and data falsification during clinical trials of Pfizer's so-called Covid-19 vaccine (Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial | The BMJ).

It is worth mentioning that Pfizer has an absolute record of corporate crimes and misdemeanors committed. For example, the total amount of fines imposed on Pfizer since 2000 is $10,268,423,998 / 50,683,811,327.49 ($10 billion 268 million 423 thousand 998 / 50 billion 683 million 811 thousand 327). Among the crimes for which Pfizer has been fined are product safety and corruption offenses. (https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizerpfizer | Violation Tracker (goodjobsfirst.org).

VACCINE ADVERSE REACTIONS AND THE ISSUE OF INFORMED CONSENT

As early as October 22, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had a list of 22 possible post-vaccine adverse effects from the manufacturers of Covid-19 products https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

FDA's oversight of vaccine safety against COVID-19 - Working list of possible adverse events, p. 16 ***DRAFT*** are subject to change.

-Guillain-Barré syndrome

-Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

-Transverse myelitis

-Cerebral encephalitis/myelitis/encephalitis/encephalopathy

-Convulsions/epileptic seizures

-Cerebral stroke

-Narcolepsy and cataplexy

-Anaphylaxis

-Acute myocardial infarction

-Myocarditis/pericarditis

-Autoimmune disease

-Deaths

-Complications of pregnancy and childbirth

-Other acute demyelinating diseases

-Allergic reactions other than anaphylactic reactions

-Trombocytopenia (i.e., reduced platelet count)

-Disseminated intravascular coagulation

-Venous thromboembolism

-Arthritis and joint pain

-Kawasaki disease

-Multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children

-Antibody-dependent Enchacement (disease).

In accordance with the Nuremberg Code and other regulations governing clinical trials/experiments, there was a need to obtain the informed and voluntary consent of the participants for their participation in the study.

Can we speak of the voluntary consent of a participant in an experiment, while there were pressures that conditioned the ability to perform an occupation, move around, participate in broader social life and perform other important life functions without the Covid-19 INJECTION? The voluntariness of this consent should not be in doubt, which is not the case. It is extremely important to understand that those taking Covid-19 INJECTIONS were not informed that they have no epidemiological significance for the spread of the virus, as both vaccinated and unvaccinated people can become infected and infect others. These injections were supposed to make the course of the disease milder, which again, according to current statistics, has not been confirmed.

Currently, Pfizer's President of International Developed Markets, Janine Small, has confirmed the fact of Pfizer's product's lack of epidemiological significance beyond any doubt. This happened at a recent hearing in the European Parliament, and was reported by European Parliament member Rob Roos, representing the Netherlands:

https://twitter.com/Rob_Roos/status/1579759795225198593

"If you are not vaccinated, you are antisocial," Rob Roos said. "This is what the Dutch prime minister and health minister told us. You don't vaccinate just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for society as a whole. That's what I said today. This turned out to be complete nonsense at the Covid hearing in the European Parliament, one Pfizer executive just told me that at the time of introduction, the vaccine was never tested to stop virus transmission. This removes the entire legal basis of the Covid passport - the Covid passport that has led to massive institutional discrimination, as people have lost access to essential parts of society," Roos added. "I find it shocking, even criminal." Roos shared his exchange with Janine Small.

"I will speak in English so that there are no misunderstandings," Roos said. "Was Pfizer's Covid vaccine tested to stop virus transmission before it entered the market? If not, please say so clearly. If yes, are you willing to share data with this committee? And I really want a straight yes or no answer, and I'm looking forward to it."

"As for the question, did we know about stopping immunization before it was essentially on the market?" Pfizer executive J. Small admitted: "No... We really had to act at the speed of science to really understand what was happening in the market."

"This is a scandal," Roos commented in his video. "Millions of people around the world felt compelled to get vaccinated because of the myth that you do it for others. It turned out to be a cheap lie. It should have been exposed.

Contrary to this fact, active disinformation, had the effect of limiting freedom and demonizing the unvaccinated as threatening to the vaccinated.

Among the questionable things are the data on mortality and adverse effects from the disease, which were unreliable; the causes of death were incomplete, as was the failure to conduct autopsies to determine whether a patient died from Covid's or just a positive PCR or antigen test. The age of patients and their comorbidities were not taken into account in the statistics. A narrative of fear was created. The state relied solely on vaccination and did not take into account other treatments, which were rejected a priori, and doctors who proposed treatments other than the officially accepted and even imposed ones are still suffering the legal and personal consequences, despite the fact that they are precisely effective, because they save lives and health and comply with medical ethics and the Hippocratic oath.(Ivermectin for COVID-19: real-time analysis of all 184 studies (c19ivermectin.com) and https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/translations/)

This means that the prerequisite for the approval of a conditional product, was not met, because other treatments were not considered. The evidently erroneous policy in the treatment of Covid-19, excluded methods and means of treating Covid-19 patients other than vaccination, and did not do everything to obtain the required informed consent of patients.

Not only were those taking the drugs unaware of the possibility of the above-mentioned post-vaccination adverse effects, but most of them were not even aware that they were taking part in a clinical trial - an experiment all phases of which have not been completed to this day. Thus, they did not know that they were taking a product that had not been clinically tested, nor were they aware of its possible consequences for their lives and health. On the contrary, they were assured that the product had been tested, that it was "safe and effective" and was the only way not to get sick and avoid adverse effects, including death. It was claimed that it was the only way to return to "normalcy" in society. They were also not informed that they would have to take "booster doses."

Since this is an experimental therapy, it goes without saying that Covid-19 formulations’ manufacturers are required to provide the full list of ingredients used and full transparency. However, despite this obvious requirement, they still do not provide their full composition.

Moreover, the contract with Pfizer, signed on 28.09.2021, recently made public by the Slovenian government, clearly states:

"The state further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are currently unknown."

d76942_5af19ff7389d405585ae0c9db50eb306.pdf (usrfiles.com)

So how can this product be widely advertised as safe and effective? How can it be administered to pregnant women and children? Or how anyone can conduct experiments using this product on young children?

How is it possible that this product is administered even to quite young children who were not in the statistics of those at risk of Covid severity, while some of the declared ingredients of Pfizer (ALC-0315 and ALC-0159) or Moderna (SM-102) are intended for research use only (RESEARCH USE ONLY/RUO)? Just check it on the websites of the manufacturers of these substances:

ALC-0315；2036272-55-4-德尔塔(Delta)生物试剂(delta-f.com) ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4

"Delta supplies ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 for scientific research only, and not for human treatment, drug development or other commercial use. If any purchaser or third party purchases our ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 for treatment, drug development or commercial use, the purchaser or third party will assume all legal responsibility and be held liable. ALC-0315; 2036272-55-4 is in stock and can be ordered with confidence."

www.delta-f.com/details/847570

Especially noteworthy here is the fact that this company produces "graphene or graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes and fullerenes."

https://www.caymanchem.com/news/sm-102-statementSM-102 for research use only (RUO)

"Products in the RUO class, such as SM-102 (Item No. 33474), are intended for in vitro or animal (exploratory or preclinical) use only.

POST-VACCINATION ADVERSE REACTIONS IN DATABASES:

EUDRAVIGILANCE REPORTING SYSTEM DATABASE

EudraVigilance is a European database of reports of suspected adverse drug reactions. It is a pharmacovigilance database for the collection and analysis of suspected adverse reaction data primarily from the European Economic Area, EEA (European Economic Area).

The European (EEA and non-EEA countries) database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, verified by the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and they are now reporting 50,663 fatalities, and 5,315,063 injuries following injections of EMA-authorized experimental COVID-19 shots as of February 25, 2023.

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA (ELASOMERAN)

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA ORIGINAL/OMICRON BA.1 (ELASOMERAN, IMELASOMERAN)

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE MODERNA ORIGINAL/OMICRON BA.4-5 (ELASOMERAN, DAVESOMERAN)

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH (TOZINAMERAN)

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH ORIGINAL/OMICRON BA.1 (TOZINAMERAN, RILTOZINAMERAN)

• COVID-19 MRNA VACCINE PFIZER-BIONTECH ORIGINAL/OMICRON BA.4-5 (TOZINAMERAN, FAMTOZINAMERAN)

• COVID-19 VACCINE ASTRAZENECA (CHADOX1 NCOV-19)

• COVID-19 VACCINE JANSSEN (AD26.COV2.S)

• COVID-19 VACCINE NOVAVAX (NVX-COV2373)

• COVID-19 VACCINE VALNEVA

• COVID-19 VACCINE VIDPREVTYN BETA

Of the total recorded adverse effects classified as "serious" if it corresponds to a medical event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization, causes another medically important condition or prolongs an existing hospitalization, results in permanent or substantial disability or incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

The total number of individual case reports for Covid-19 vaccines in the EudraVigilance system raises very serious concerns about the safety of these products and indicates the need for immediate, urgent action.

VAERS DATABASE (USA)

Studies show that about 40 percent of reports in VAERS are entered by health care professionals - doctors, nurses, certified nursing assistants (CNAs), etc. The vetting process is lengthy and handled by a handful of contracted employees. There is a huge backlog of data collection at VAERS. The data is updated weekly and is available for the public to download.

Intentionally falsely reporting complications to VAERS is a federal crime in the US:

"Knowingly submitting a false VAERS report is a violation of federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fines and imprisonment." (The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Request (cdc.gov)

The VAERS system currently reports 34,828 deaths and 1,514,536 adverse effects from COVID-19 injections:

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=CAT&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19

Below is a detailed list of all complications reported to VAERS:

https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?TABLE=ON&GROUP1=SYM&EVENTS=ON&VAX=COVID19

SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS ON POST-VACCINATION ADVERSE EFFECTS

publications7-25.pdf (react19.org) 

SUDDEN DEATH SYNDROME

Doctors trying to determine why many young people are suddenly dying | Daily Mail Online , Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics

WHAT IS IN THE COMPOSITION OF THESE PRODUCTS?

DECLARED AND UNDECLARED INGREDIENTS

DECLARED INGREDIENTS

As mentioned above, according to the manufacturers of the lipid nanoparticles used in the Covid-19 formulations in question and according to their Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), it appears that the lipid nanoparticles used are "NOT FOR HUMAN USE".

- PFIZER:ALC-0159 and ALC-0315This product is intended for research purposes - Not suitable for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.

- MODERNA: SM-102Intended for research purposes only.

In addition to these substances, another experimental product that causes possible side reactions is [PEG] 2000: 2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide [mPEG-DTA] [ALC-0159] CAS: 1849616-42-7 2-[(polyethylene Glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide [mPEG-DTA] [ALC-0159] CAS: 1849616-42-7 Manufacturer | Sinopeg.com

DANGERS OF PEG (or poly-ethylene-glycol) USE

According to existing scientific animal studies of a substance called polyethylene glycol, PEGylation formulations use micromolar amounts of these lipids, representing a potentially immunogenic low-dose exposure. Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine trigger rare allergic reactions | Science | AAAS).

Recently, the FDA decided to approve "booster doses" of formulations against "further variants" of Sars-COV-2, without requiring any further clinical trials. (Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee June 28, 2022 Meeting Briefing Document- FDA) The decision is shocking, if only given the mere presence of poly(ethylene glycol) PEGs in these injections.

How can these products be used directly on the human population without investigating the possibility of developing serious side effects known from previous studies using PEGylated therapies on animals?

An example of the potential problem can be seen in a recent Israel National News article, New study links COVID vaccines to 25% increase in cardiac arrest for both males & females | Israel National News - Arutz Sheva

GENE THERAPY

The very FDA website refers to these formulations as "gene therapy" (Coronavirus Treatment Acceleration Program (CTAP) | FDA"Gene therapy products are designed to modify or manipulate gene expression or alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic purposes."

Note that these INJECTIONS are being administered to the entire world population today, without sufficient testing of their potential toxicity, without adequate monitoring, without knowing what to monitor at all, when it is not known what is being administered.

The manufacturers of these formulations, as well as the bodies that are supposed to regulate them, deny a link between health adverse effects in people who have taken them.

At the same time, autopsies are not performed on people who have died as a result of complications, the health status of people who have suffered complications is not monitored, adequate research is not carried out, and the lack of knowledge of the full composition of the administered product by the authorities transferring the product at the national level is downright unimaginable. So, without knowing the full composition of the product, how can a causal link be established between the occurrence of adverse effects, including deaths caused by this product, much less how can it be ruled out a priori, without verification and testing?

Even more disturbing is that conditional product approval, as opposed to Full Product Approval, allows the seller of these formulations to not only keep the ingredients secret, but also to change the composition of the INJECTION without notifying the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or any other organization, person or entity.

UNDECLARED INGREDIENTS

As the following document, released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), shows, there are undeclared ingredients in Pfizer's Covid-19 formulations:

description and composition redacted.pdf (whatdotheyknow.com) (Https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/801347/response/1912708/attach/3/description%20and%20composition%20redacted.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1)

Exact quantity of Water for Injection pre and post dilution in BNT162b2 - a Freedom of Information request to Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency - WhatDoTheyKnow (Https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/exact_quantity_of_water_for_inje)

An acronym used by Pfizer in connection with its product: BioNTech is an acronym for the word Bio nanotechnology.

The definition of Bio nanotechnology is: Biological application of nanotechnology.

There are many indications and even evidence that toxic ingredients such as graphene and heavy metals have been used in the Covid-19 products, including injections in question. When administered as an injection, they pose a threat to the life and health of the person to whom these formulations are injected. Moreover, there is a high probability that they are being used not for the purposes claimed by the manufacturers of these preparations, but for other purposes.

Hiding the presence of these ingredients and their actual purpose in these products is a crime.

This deprives the entire human population of making an informed decision in receiving these injections.

But it also deprives people who have already taken these products possibility to prevent themselves from their toxic effects - from getting the antidote.

Evidence of the use of nanotechnology in these preparations against Covid-19, can be found in the following scientific reports:

What is in the so-called COVID-19 “Vaccines”? Part 1: Evidence of a Global Crime Against Humanity | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)

Abstract

Between July 2021 and August 2022, evidence of the undisclosed components of COVID-19 "vaccines" was published by at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 different countries on five continents using spectroscopic and microscopic analysis. Despite operating largely independently of each other, their findings are remarkably similar and underscore the clear and present danger that the world's population has been lied to about the contents of COVID-19 "vaccines." This raises serious questions about the true purpose of the dangerous experimental injections, which have so far been injected into 5.33 billion people (more than two-thirds of the human race), including children, apparently without their informed consent as to the contents. Surprising findings include geometric structures with sharp edges, fibrous or tube-like structures, crystalline formations, "microbubbles" and possible self-assembling nanotechnology. The blood of people who received one or more COVID-19 "vaccines" turns out, in each case, to contain foreign bodies and be severely degraded, with red blood cells usually in Rouleaux formation. Taken together, these 26 studies form a powerful argument for the full force of scientific research to be borne on the contents of the COVID-19 "vaccine." If the results of these 26 studies are confirmed, then the political implications are nothing short of revolutionary: a global crime against humanity has been committed in which every government, every regulatory body, every media organization and all professions have been complicit.

Toxic Components Found in Blood of Patients Who Took COVID Vaccines: German Scientists (theepochtimes.com)Sammlung_erster_Ergebnisse_der_AG_Impfstoffe_Aufklärung_20220706.pdf (aerzte-fuer-aufklaerung.de)

The study was conducted by a group of 60 scientists from Germany and other countries who tested Pfizer BioNTech and Moderna's anti-Covid-19 formulations. Using several methods of measurement, in all samples without exception, the scientists found ingredients that:

1. are, in the quantities found, toxic according to medical guidelines,

2. were not declared by manufacturers to be present in vaccines,

3. are predominantly metallic,

4. are visible by dark-field microscopy as characteristic and complex structures of various sizes,

5. they can only partially be explained as the result of crystallization or decomposition processes,

6. cannot be explained by their presence as contamination as a result of the manufacturing process.

The following predominantly metallic elements were unexpectedly detected in doses from AstraZeneca, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna:

- Alkali metals: cesium (Cs), potassium (K),

- Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba),

- Transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti),

- Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd),

- Mining group/metal: aluminum (Al),

- Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partially support/slip material),

- Oxygen group: sulfur (S)

According to accepted standards, structures larger than 0.22 micrometers are not allowed in this type of preparation, meanwhile, some of the structures found had a cross section of 25 micrometers (that is, up to 100x larger than allowed).

Another study was reported in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research titled: "Dark-field microscopic analysis of the blood of 1,006 symptomatic subjects after preparations against Covid-19 mRNA from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna (Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (archive.org), https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/foreign-metal-like-objects-some-appearing-as-graphene-family-superstructures-found-in-94-percent-of-people-who-took-mrna-vaccine) In the study, Italian doctors found metal-like foreign bodies in 94% of people who took mRNA vaccines. Three Italian surgeons analyzed the peripheral blood drops of 1,006 people with vaccine complications, following Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA preparations. It found that 94%t of them had "erythrocyte aggregation and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin," one month after vaccination."

The metallic particles were found early on in various batches of Moderna and were recalled in Japan:

Japan suspends 1.6 mln doses of Moderna shot after contamination reports | Reuters

Moderna vaccine production continues in EU amid contamination probe | Reuters

Japan suspends 1.63M doses of Moderna over contamination | Fox News

---

STOP THE GENOCIDE NOW!