Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The following graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity.
Farley Mowat, the noted Canadian leftist and Greenpeace activist, and whose house my wife used to walk by regularly as a kid in Port Hope, ON., wrote in his book West Viking (written while we were still in the global cooling scare) that there were probably at least dwarf forests growing in Greenland when the Vikings arrived in 985 AD and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History reports “… Erik the Red discovered two areas of southwest Greenland which were suitable for farming, with grasslands and small stands of alder and birch.” You will note that it is too cold today for any type of forests to grow in Greenland, and there is zero ability to farm, unless modern technologies are utilized – and even then, crop selection is very minimal.
Mowat also reported the Arctic pack ice was much less in that Viking discovery era than today. Dr. Fred Singer writes that when the Vikings first settled Greenland, they grew vegetables, and it was warm enough to allow the population to grow to 3,000 people and by 1100 AD the place was thriving enough that they had their own bishop and twelve churches. Nature reported in a 2010 article that clamshell studies also confirm Norse records. Meanwhile, the Archeological Survey of Canada has also noted around “A.D. 1000, a warmer climate resulted in the tree line advancing 100 kilometres north of its present position.” The results of this? Especially in northern Europe, “the period between 1150 and 1300 was truly a flowering period, for population reached unprecedented levels that were never to be seen again until the late 18thcentury in many countries; the English population experienced a staggering threefold increase in its population during the last century since the Domesday Survey in 1086”. This climate optimum (also called a climate anomaly) coincided with a period of increased solar activity (see below). Farming of various crops extended hundreds of kilometers farther north than it is possible today.
Note that he would be scientifically or intellectually honest enough to look at this.
What we need to assess is the accuracy of how the scientists measure today's temperatures. I do not trust any word put out there by anybody. All I have claimed for the basis of my stand, along with the factual dispensing of barium, aluminum, magnesium, graphene, and other toxic tiny metal flakes into the sky via chemtrails (what other purpose is there possible, than geo-engineering?), is my own observation of living in the same geographic location for 60+ years and seeing an increase of well over five degrees on average, as well as a great reduction of snow fall. We know that the "experts" are misinformed and many are outright liars.
Yes, geo engineering is being done. But do you understand the difference between weather and climate? Do you understand that the Vostok core proves that temps PRECEED CO2 rise? As a matter of scientific fact, there has been no rise in temps the last 8 years, GLOBAL average, day and night temps.
We are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Do you even know what those acronyms are? I simply don't understand how you can can conflate the end of the LIA with some kind of catastrophic AGW. Or perhaps you believe that fake hockey stick that Mann created and was bandied about, but later outed my Macintryre?
It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier - which I have personally stood on - TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Yes, it has melted a lot the past century ********because we are emerging from the LIA********
Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD, when it was warmer than today? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
The founder of the Weather Channel, the late John Coleman, Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof. of atmospheric science at MIT, and Dr. Wm Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in teh world, have all called anthropogenic global warming, AGW, in ***THEIR WORDS, NOT MINE*** a - and I quote ipsissima verba - "a scam."
I am sorry you have fallen for the ruse. But you are confusing weather with climate. But I;m sure the boys at the WEF in Davos are happy to see your gullibility
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time ever record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
I remember looking at climate graphs from NOAA, and most of them only go back to about 1880. Total joke when you also consider that they don't even take into account natural climate variability aka The Sun.
I appreciate your research, but there were multiple reasons for the plandemic. First is a depopulation agenda, per the Georgia Guidestones, the powers plan a world fascist totalitarian technocratic police state of 500 million survivors by 2025. Furthermore, the technocratic police state will use the digitization inside the vaccinated (which emits a Bluetooth signal) for credit and surveillance purposes. Control in the new world order (look at the back of your one dollar bill- novus ordo seclorum- latin for NEW WORLD ORDER) is facilitated by the credit system and the economic punishments made possible rids the need for police. I say "police state" in that we will be policed by surveillance and credit. Cut off purchase and travel ability for transgressions.
Just say whoah!!!! And No!!! - problem, very few will be able to handle living off the system that we are being herded into. And the ones that can and do can be sought out. This is such a mess in our beautiful world. Deep breath, many deep breaths. A cloak of invisibility?
Does anyone here understand that the Vostok core proves that temps PRECEED CO2 rise? As a matter of scientific fact, there has been no rise in temps the last 8 years, GLOBAL average, day and night temps.
We are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Does anyone even know what these basic acronyms are before they start spouting off? I simply don't understand how one can can conflate the end of the LIA with some kind of catastrophic AGW. Or perhaps you believe that fake hockey stick that Mann created and was bandied about, but later outed my Macintryre?
former FDA investigator Dr. Arthur Evangelista, noted that the 2010 eruption of Eyafjallajokull in Iceland emitted, in four days, enough CO2 in four days to negate every single effort mankind made that year to reduce CO2. But this volcano was a piker compared to Mt. Pinatubo, which when it erupted in the Philippines in 1991 “spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in its entire 40 MILLION YEARS on earth.” (of course, the Laki eruption starting in Iceland in 1783 spewed out an An estimated 120,000,000 long tons (120,000,000 t) of sulphur dioxide, about three times the total annual European industrial output in 2006, equivalent to six times the total 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption!) And this doesn’t include that fact that, as he notes the “bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.”
It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier - which I have personally stood on - TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Yes, it has melted a lot the past century ********because we are emerging from the LIA******** I regularly hike back at Bow Glacier Falls, Alberta. I have a book with a pix from 1898 of the glacier. Then compare to my pix today, it is FAR receeded. So, the easily duped scream AGW! In fact, while we don't have pix, if Vatnajokull is any indication it was MUCH further receded 1000 year ago.
And you think CO2, which is natural and A PLANT FOOD, is a "pollutant????" In fact, we are at the far BOTTOM of CO2 levels in world history today, right now.
Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD, when it was warmer than today? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
The founder of the Weather Channel, the late John Coleman, Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof. of atmospheric science at MIT, and Dr. Wm Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in teh world, have all called anthropogenic global warming, AGW, in ***THEIR WORDS, NOT MINE*** a - and I quote ipsissima verba - "a scam."
I am sorry you have fallen for readers here falling for the WEF ruse, confusing weather with climate. But I;m sure the boys at the WEF in Davos are happy to see the h gullibility
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time EVER record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling??
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
Indeed, when I was visiting Iceland at Skaftafell Nat'l Park a few years ago, Icelandic historians know from extant deeds – and have put in the displays at the park - that somewhere around FORTY old Viking era farms are currently buried under the Vatnajokull glacier system (the largest in the world outside of Greenland and Antarctica). In other words, it was simply much warmer in the Icelandic settlement era than it is today. We are routinely informed of the melting of Greenland glaciers today at lower altitudes, but demonstrably there are at bare minimum low altitude glaciers in roughly the same geographic area that had seen more melting and more pronounced glacial recession one thousand years ago than we see today. Al Gore may want to visit Skaftafell National Park in Iceland on one of his many jet-setting, carbon burning trips to check the facts himself. More evidence: There are records of grape growing occurring in places in northern Europe back during this optimum where they can't grow today. Gregory McNamee, in the Weather Guide Calendar (Accord Publishing, 2002) noted that wine connoisseurs might have gone to England for fine vintages (can’t grow fine vintage grapes there today!), that heat loving trees like beeches carpeted Europe far into Scandinavia, and Viking ships crossed iceberg free oceans to ice free harbors in Iceland…”. Art Horn writes that “In the winter of 1249 it was so warm in England that people did not need winter clothes. They walked about in summer dress. It was so warm people thought the seasons had changed. There was no frost in England the entire winter. Can you imagine what NOAA would say if that happened next year? “
Even the lead global warmer at “AGW Central” East Anglia Univ., in the UK, fraud Phil Jones, before he was outed during the ClimateGate revelations, was forced to admit to the BBC that the MWP (Medieval Warm Period) was real.
That is not the point. The point is that we are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Do you even know what those acronyms are? It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time ever record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
YOu are damn retarded, read some information regarding thousands of years ago and think that has a bearing on the last six or seven years that has been the entire increase, not the slow gradual increase you claim. Furthermore, chemtrails (geo-engineering) are for climate, not weather. the tiny metal flakes create a greenhouse effect, and thus the global warming. I never bought into carbon, your argument is moot. The weather warfare is not done by the chemtrails, they do use some salts to cause rain, and also HAARP to create hurricanes, tornadoes, and such. Floods and such are also manipulated by seeding and other methods. That is not chemtrails. YOU need to research both sides if you want to truly come to an accurate conclusion. It does not help to assume that the one you are debating has fallen for the deceptions put out there because you think he agrees with them . I don't. get my newsletter for real truth
YOu need to look at the division caused by the news media, and in collusion with "experts"- have you not noticed that in many areas of mindsets and worldviews, that the two opposing sides, liberals and conservatives, watch their own news sources, who feed them affirming information which opposes the other side. BLM really addresses real police brutality. But are portrayed as violent racists themselves in the conservative media. January 6th was a protest of a stolen election, but liberal news called it insurrection by white supremacists. Both sides on many subjects have some truth, and some falsehood. This is done intentionally by the powers with full complicity in the establishment news media to cause division. We need to think outside the boxes and come to our own conclusions by research and thinking outside the boxes. They want us quibbling over nonsense rather than to join together in resistance. I never never bought into carbon being the problem, nor did I ever say it was. I do not like pollution, but dammit, you have me all wrong. Think!!
I never believed the carbon story. Don't assume. And you talk about intellectual integrity. Think a little. Answer me. Why are they dispensing those metals in chemtrails? Why has it only been the last half dozen years a very steep increase in temperature, ten times more than they claim, with 85% less snow than it used to be? This was not a gradual rise in temperature. I comprehend fully that there is weather warfare also, but that is in addition. You need to put all factors into consideration, as well as sources.
Yes, why ARE they dispsensing metals in chemtrails? The answer is simple.
If you really think there is a "very steep increase in temps," you are free to believe what you want. But as noted, we are below the 3,000 year ave temps, it was CLEARLY warmer in the MWP (I doubt you know what this is), there WAS warming on Pluto per Dr Sallie Baliunas, Harvard Smithsonian, Mars per CalTech, and Pluto, per the red spot growing, during the period when there was warming. And as noted, even lead warmer Phil Jones at East Anglia admitted with MWP was real to the BBC. That was before he was forced out due to the scam with Climategate, which I'll bet you also know nothing about, right?
In fact, I have a 700p. paper with over 5,000 footnotes. I believe I have "put all factors" in already.
Sum of the matter is, there is evil afoot with geoengineering, paired with utter ignorance. Fact is, is some record hi in NJ means as much as the record low where I live a couple years ago.
I am shocked at the pudding headedness shown on this site.
Sadly, it appears you have insults but no points to make. Sad. But since you appear to be subservient to the Deep State, the simple fact is that this is part of their grotesque Malthusian presuppositions paired with buying in to their own propaganda. The alternative explanation is that they continue, as we see with the destruction of food plants, the destruction of a major food producing area in PA. now with dioxin, etc. , with their transhumanism agenda. Their fascist forebears, where fascism is defined by Mussolini in his eponymous 1932 The Doctrine of Fascism, as the merger of the socialist state with coopted, crony big biz.
Nor did you answer any of the climatological facts noted.
I really don't have time for the intellectually dishonest, so will leave this hear. I really can't waste my time with the intellectually dishonest AGW types who don't even know basic climatological terms. Bye!
It has only been the last six or seven years, and the AVERAGE temperature is five to eight degrees warmer average on the regular..constantly. It had been steady and regular before this all my life. And if you believe that we had men on the moon and that space is what they say.. i will simply end the conversation, you believe any bullshit coming from somebody using jargon and claims that he knows you are unable to refute. YOu need to stop assuming about my words and thinking. where i Live, as a child until seven years ago, every winter average temp was 25-40 degrees, never ever went above 50. snowed almost every week, and each winter had at least a couple of snows over 6 inches. Now the average temp is 35-48 . occasionally goes to 60, and one or two snows a year a couple of inches. No snow yet this year. I am puddin though, and you are the genius for knowing about mars and pluto and such. Funny that while they had technology to go to the moon sixty years ago, and now lost it and can no longer do that. And the ozone layer? funny it had a small hole in it years ago from nothing, and the scientists were all worried that the sky would fall. Now we have tens of thousands of satellites (we are told) going into space, as well as rockets, and no problem. And the earth rotating? put your hand out the window of your car at 60 mph. strong wind resistance. the earth supposedly spins ten times faster. does gravity hold the atmosphere to it, stopping wind? if so, why is there wind in every direction? the answer is that the earth does not rotate, and the sun revolves around the earth, thus explaining why we have sun while china has night. But believe the bullshit about mars, pluto, saturn, and all the other planets we visit when we cannot reach the moon.
Just a quick note to the vile Ajay:
Kegwin, who wrote in Science, 1996:274:1504-1508, the mean surface temp of the Sargasso Sea (which lies roughly between the West Indies and the Azores), which was obtained by readings of isotope ratios in marine organism remains in sediment, shows we are, today, below the three thousand year average, and far below the Medieval Climatic Optimum, albeit far above the LIA. Civil Defense Perspectives, Mar. 2007, Vol. 23, #3, p. 1, notes that evidence for this climatic optimum has been found in all but 2 out of 103 locations where it was examined for, including Asia, Africa, South America and the western U.S. The following graph of temperature in the Sargasso Sea tells you all you need to know (note: that big horizontal line running across the page is the 3,000 year average!), Interestingly, the warmer times coincided not only with the best harvests, but also the least amount of major storm activity.
Or let’s put it another way, from the Dansgaard & Johnson study, cited ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Average-near-surface-temperatures-of-the-northern-hemisphere-during-the-past-11000-years_fig5_313127868 shows the same.
Farley Mowat, the noted Canadian leftist and Greenpeace activist, and whose house my wife used to walk by regularly as a kid in Port Hope, ON., wrote in his book West Viking (written while we were still in the global cooling scare) that there were probably at least dwarf forests growing in Greenland when the Vikings arrived in 985 AD and the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History reports “… Erik the Red discovered two areas of southwest Greenland which were suitable for farming, with grasslands and small stands of alder and birch.” You will note that it is too cold today for any type of forests to grow in Greenland, and there is zero ability to farm, unless modern technologies are utilized – and even then, crop selection is very minimal.
Mowat also reported the Arctic pack ice was much less in that Viking discovery era than today. Dr. Fred Singer writes that when the Vikings first settled Greenland, they grew vegetables, and it was warm enough to allow the population to grow to 3,000 people and by 1100 AD the place was thriving enough that they had their own bishop and twelve churches. Nature reported in a 2010 article that clamshell studies also confirm Norse records. Meanwhile, the Archeological Survey of Canada has also noted around “A.D. 1000, a warmer climate resulted in the tree line advancing 100 kilometres north of its present position.” The results of this? Especially in northern Europe, “the period between 1150 and 1300 was truly a flowering period, for population reached unprecedented levels that were never to be seen again until the late 18thcentury in many countries; the English population experienced a staggering threefold increase in its population during the last century since the Domesday Survey in 1086”. This climate optimum (also called a climate anomaly) coincided with a period of increased solar activity (see below). Farming of various crops extended hundreds of kilometers farther north than it is possible today.
Note that he would be scientifically or intellectually honest enough to look at this.
What we need to assess is the accuracy of how the scientists measure today's temperatures. I do not trust any word put out there by anybody. All I have claimed for the basis of my stand, along with the factual dispensing of barium, aluminum, magnesium, graphene, and other toxic tiny metal flakes into the sky via chemtrails (what other purpose is there possible, than geo-engineering?), is my own observation of living in the same geographic location for 60+ years and seeing an increase of well over five degrees on average, as well as a great reduction of snow fall. We know that the "experts" are misinformed and many are outright liars.
Yes, geo engineering is being done. But do you understand the difference between weather and climate? Do you understand that the Vostok core proves that temps PRECEED CO2 rise? As a matter of scientific fact, there has been no rise in temps the last 8 years, GLOBAL average, day and night temps.
We are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Do you even know what those acronyms are? I simply don't understand how you can can conflate the end of the LIA with some kind of catastrophic AGW. Or perhaps you believe that fake hockey stick that Mann created and was bandied about, but later outed my Macintryre?
It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier - which I have personally stood on - TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Yes, it has melted a lot the past century ********because we are emerging from the LIA********
Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD, when it was warmer than today? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
The founder of the Weather Channel, the late John Coleman, Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof. of atmospheric science at MIT, and Dr. Wm Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in teh world, have all called anthropogenic global warming, AGW, in ***THEIR WORDS, NOT MINE*** a - and I quote ipsissima verba - "a scam."
I am sorry you have fallen for the ruse. But you are confusing weather with climate. But I;m sure the boys at the WEF in Davos are happy to see your gullibility
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time ever record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
I remember looking at climate graphs from NOAA, and most of them only go back to about 1880. Total joke when you also consider that they don't even take into account natural climate variability aka The Sun.
I appreciate your research, but there were multiple reasons for the plandemic. First is a depopulation agenda, per the Georgia Guidestones, the powers plan a world fascist totalitarian technocratic police state of 500 million survivors by 2025. Furthermore, the technocratic police state will use the digitization inside the vaccinated (which emits a Bluetooth signal) for credit and surveillance purposes. Control in the new world order (look at the back of your one dollar bill- novus ordo seclorum- latin for NEW WORLD ORDER) is facilitated by the credit system and the economic punishments made possible rids the need for police. I say "police state" in that we will be policed by surveillance and credit. Cut off purchase and travel ability for transgressions.
https://truthforceinternationalrevolution.online
Another good reason to throw out our bluetooth devices and headphones. No tooth, no bite.
I never had a smart phone or used blutooth. I use wired headphones
Just say whoah!!!! And No!!! - problem, very few will be able to handle living off the system that we are being herded into. And the ones that can and do can be sought out. This is such a mess in our beautiful world. Deep breath, many deep breaths. A cloak of invisibility?
"...Ajay Banga is someone who understands internationalism and the role of finance in a very deep way"
Unfortunately, he does NOT understand that he is a tool of evil and a literal devil.
Does anyone here understand that the Vostok core proves that temps PRECEED CO2 rise? As a matter of scientific fact, there has been no rise in temps the last 8 years, GLOBAL average, day and night temps.
We are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Does anyone even know what these basic acronyms are before they start spouting off? I simply don't understand how one can can conflate the end of the LIA with some kind of catastrophic AGW. Or perhaps you believe that fake hockey stick that Mann created and was bandied about, but later outed my Macintryre?
former FDA investigator Dr. Arthur Evangelista, noted that the 2010 eruption of Eyafjallajokull in Iceland emitted, in four days, enough CO2 in four days to negate every single effort mankind made that year to reduce CO2. But this volcano was a piker compared to Mt. Pinatubo, which when it erupted in the Philippines in 1991 “spewed out more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than the entire human race had emitted in its entire 40 MILLION YEARS on earth.” (of course, the Laki eruption starting in Iceland in 1783 spewed out an An estimated 120,000,000 long tons (120,000,000 t) of sulphur dioxide, about three times the total annual European industrial output in 2006, equivalent to six times the total 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption!) And this doesn’t include that fact that, as he notes the “bush fire season across the western USA and Australia this year alone will negate your efforts to reduce carbon in our world for the next two to three years. And it happens every year.”
It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier - which I have personally stood on - TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Yes, it has melted a lot the past century ********because we are emerging from the LIA******** I regularly hike back at Bow Glacier Falls, Alberta. I have a book with a pix from 1898 of the glacier. Then compare to my pix today, it is FAR receeded. So, the easily duped scream AGW! In fact, while we don't have pix, if Vatnajokull is any indication it was MUCH further receded 1000 year ago.
And you think CO2, which is natural and A PLANT FOOD, is a "pollutant????" In fact, we are at the far BOTTOM of CO2 levels in world history today, right now.
Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD, when it was warmer than today? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
The founder of the Weather Channel, the late John Coleman, Dr. Richard Lindzen, prof. of atmospheric science at MIT, and Dr. Wm Gray, the #1 hurricane forecaster in teh world, have all called anthropogenic global warming, AGW, in ***THEIR WORDS, NOT MINE*** a - and I quote ipsissima verba - "a scam."
I am sorry you have fallen for readers here falling for the WEF ruse, confusing weather with climate. But I;m sure the boys at the WEF in Davos are happy to see the h gullibility
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time EVER record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling??
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
Indeed, when I was visiting Iceland at Skaftafell Nat'l Park a few years ago, Icelandic historians know from extant deeds – and have put in the displays at the park - that somewhere around FORTY old Viking era farms are currently buried under the Vatnajokull glacier system (the largest in the world outside of Greenland and Antarctica). In other words, it was simply much warmer in the Icelandic settlement era than it is today. We are routinely informed of the melting of Greenland glaciers today at lower altitudes, but demonstrably there are at bare minimum low altitude glaciers in roughly the same geographic area that had seen more melting and more pronounced glacial recession one thousand years ago than we see today. Al Gore may want to visit Skaftafell National Park in Iceland on one of his many jet-setting, carbon burning trips to check the facts himself. More evidence: There are records of grape growing occurring in places in northern Europe back during this optimum where they can't grow today. Gregory McNamee, in the Weather Guide Calendar (Accord Publishing, 2002) noted that wine connoisseurs might have gone to England for fine vintages (can’t grow fine vintage grapes there today!), that heat loving trees like beeches carpeted Europe far into Scandinavia, and Viking ships crossed iceberg free oceans to ice free harbors in Iceland…”. Art Horn writes that “In the winter of 1249 it was so warm in England that people did not need winter clothes. They walked about in summer dress. It was so warm people thought the seasons had changed. There was no frost in England the entire winter. Can you imagine what NOAA would say if that happened next year? “
Even the lead global warmer at “AGW Central” East Anglia Univ., in the UK, fraud Phil Jones, before he was outed during the ClimateGate revelations, was forced to admit to the BBC that the MWP (Medieval Warm Period) was real.
Last week it was 69 degrees here in Jersey. Highest on record.
That is not the point. The point is that we are STILL COMING OUT of the LIA, so of course it is warmer. ***We are still below the 3,000 year average, and despite being warmer than the 1800s, the early part which was the nadir of the LIA, we are still - as lead global warmer Phil Jones at the UKs East Anglia Univ. admitted to BBC - below the 3,000 year average, and COLDER than the MWP. Do you even know what those acronyms are? It was WARMER a thousand years ago, and the Vatnanjokull glacier TODAY is covering 40 Viking era farms, which we know from preserved deeds. Does this mean that Viking SUVs caused that warming in 1000 AD? There has been no overall GLOBAL warming for almost 9 years. There was some before that, but as noted, this is emergence from the LIA. At that time, per Dr. Baliunas at Harvard Smithsonian, there was warming on Pluto, CalTech said there was warming on Mars, and the red spot on Jupiter was growing due to - you guessed it - global warming on Jupiter. Do you contend our SUVs will take out Saturn next?
Worse, there are extremes every year. A couple years ago in Illinois where I live it was an all time ever record low, -36F. Does that prove there is global cooling
You are being played by the WEF. Do a search for ClimateGate. Please get a clue, and stop drinking the Koolaid
YOu are damn retarded, read some information regarding thousands of years ago and think that has a bearing on the last six or seven years that has been the entire increase, not the slow gradual increase you claim. Furthermore, chemtrails (geo-engineering) are for climate, not weather. the tiny metal flakes create a greenhouse effect, and thus the global warming. I never bought into carbon, your argument is moot. The weather warfare is not done by the chemtrails, they do use some salts to cause rain, and also HAARP to create hurricanes, tornadoes, and such. Floods and such are also manipulated by seeding and other methods. That is not chemtrails. YOU need to research both sides if you want to truly come to an accurate conclusion. It does not help to assume that the one you are debating has fallen for the deceptions put out there because you think he agrees with them . I don't. get my newsletter for real truth
https://truthforceinternationalrevolution. online
books are attached.
YOu need to look at the division caused by the news media, and in collusion with "experts"- have you not noticed that in many areas of mindsets and worldviews, that the two opposing sides, liberals and conservatives, watch their own news sources, who feed them affirming information which opposes the other side. BLM really addresses real police brutality. But are portrayed as violent racists themselves in the conservative media. January 6th was a protest of a stolen election, but liberal news called it insurrection by white supremacists. Both sides on many subjects have some truth, and some falsehood. This is done intentionally by the powers with full complicity in the establishment news media to cause division. We need to think outside the boxes and come to our own conclusions by research and thinking outside the boxes. They want us quibbling over nonsense rather than to join together in resistance. I never never bought into carbon being the problem, nor did I ever say it was. I do not like pollution, but dammit, you have me all wrong. Think!!
I never believed the carbon story. Don't assume. And you talk about intellectual integrity. Think a little. Answer me. Why are they dispensing those metals in chemtrails? Why has it only been the last half dozen years a very steep increase in temperature, ten times more than they claim, with 85% less snow than it used to be? This was not a gradual rise in temperature. I comprehend fully that there is weather warfare also, but that is in addition. You need to put all factors into consideration, as well as sources.
Yes, why ARE they dispsensing metals in chemtrails? The answer is simple.
If you really think there is a "very steep increase in temps," you are free to believe what you want. But as noted, we are below the 3,000 year ave temps, it was CLEARLY warmer in the MWP (I doubt you know what this is), there WAS warming on Pluto per Dr Sallie Baliunas, Harvard Smithsonian, Mars per CalTech, and Pluto, per the red spot growing, during the period when there was warming. And as noted, even lead warmer Phil Jones at East Anglia admitted with MWP was real to the BBC. That was before he was forced out due to the scam with Climategate, which I'll bet you also know nothing about, right?
In fact, I have a 700p. paper with over 5,000 footnotes. I believe I have "put all factors" in already.
Sum of the matter is, there is evil afoot with geoengineering, paired with utter ignorance. Fact is, is some record hi in NJ means as much as the record low where I live a couple years ago.
I am shocked at the pudding headedness shown on this site.
https://ourtube.co.uk/video/41801/the-history-of-fake-space---outer-space-does-not-exist?channelName=Arch
you still didn't answer the question, but said the answer is simple. tell me, einstein.
Sadly, it appears you have insults but no points to make. Sad. But since you appear to be subservient to the Deep State, the simple fact is that this is part of their grotesque Malthusian presuppositions paired with buying in to their own propaganda. The alternative explanation is that they continue, as we see with the destruction of food plants, the destruction of a major food producing area in PA. now with dioxin, etc. , with their transhumanism agenda. Their fascist forebears, where fascism is defined by Mussolini in his eponymous 1932 The Doctrine of Fascism, as the merger of the socialist state with coopted, crony big biz.
Nor did you answer any of the climatological facts noted.
I really don't have time for the intellectually dishonest, so will leave this hear. I really can't waste my time with the intellectually dishonest AGW types who don't even know basic climatological terms. Bye!
do you know what YAFS stands for?
It has only been the last six or seven years, and the AVERAGE temperature is five to eight degrees warmer average on the regular..constantly. It had been steady and regular before this all my life. And if you believe that we had men on the moon and that space is what they say.. i will simply end the conversation, you believe any bullshit coming from somebody using jargon and claims that he knows you are unable to refute. YOu need to stop assuming about my words and thinking. where i Live, as a child until seven years ago, every winter average temp was 25-40 degrees, never ever went above 50. snowed almost every week, and each winter had at least a couple of snows over 6 inches. Now the average temp is 35-48 . occasionally goes to 60, and one or two snows a year a couple of inches. No snow yet this year. I am puddin though, and you are the genius for knowing about mars and pluto and such. Funny that while they had technology to go to the moon sixty years ago, and now lost it and can no longer do that. And the ozone layer? funny it had a small hole in it years ago from nothing, and the scientists were all worried that the sky would fall. Now we have tens of thousands of satellites (we are told) going into space, as well as rockets, and no problem. And the earth rotating? put your hand out the window of your car at 60 mph. strong wind resistance. the earth supposedly spins ten times faster. does gravity hold the atmosphere to it, stopping wind? if so, why is there wind in every direction? the answer is that the earth does not rotate, and the sun revolves around the earth, thus explaining why we have sun while china has night. But believe the bullshit about mars, pluto, saturn, and all the other planets we visit when we cannot reach the moon.