13 Comments
Jun 22, 2023Liked by OUTRAGED HUMAN

thank you

Expand full comment

.

I Don’t Mind

All Of The Tubes And Cables

Sticking Out Of The Vaccinated.

I Am Just Wondering

If I Can Hook Up Two Of Them Together

To Make A Lava Lamp.

Or Use A Monitor Between Them

To Play Pong.

.

Expand full comment

While this write up of almost nonsensical technological prowess and achievement sounds complex and difficult to truly comprehend, it’s seems like a discussion really of just continuing to pump graphene into humans while trying to get a Wow or fear factor out of the impressionable masses.

The plan is not to create ‘health’ in people, but to end the lives of useless goyim. The discussion would imply constant monitoring of people, but is likely just another delusion upon the people to distract us or instigate fear.

We know that 5G and 6G, if 6G exists yet, are all that is required to kill us by activating the vibration of graphene in the body. They most likely have no plans to do this to a large population.

Despite all his Impressive credentials to make folks believe he’s a RSG (real smart guy), and all this is on the drawing board or beyond that, it seems like hocus to think they plan on anything beyond killing or monitoring folks thru graphene in our bodies. I have to shake my head at such ‘learn ed’ mumbo jumbo. 🤔

Interesting article however. Like reading Aldous Huxley or NASA propaganda.

Expand full comment

The application of MC (Molecular Communication) theory to human health in the aforementioned directions will face the following main challenges: 1) incomplete biological knowledge; 2) individuality and variations; 3) mutations and evolution; 4) safety and security; and 5) ethical concerns.🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

FFS!!

Lol, ironically, they nail their mind boggling meglomaniacal STUPIDITY in a nutshell, with their acknowledging "....1) incomplete biological knowledge; 2) individuality and variations; mutations and evolution;...." etc, etc.

It's a freaking Jeff Goldblum in Jurassic park moment.😐😐😑🤦‍♀️😭

Expand full comment

Dr. David Martin gave a presentation to the at the International Covid Summit hosted by the ;European Parliament, on the origin of the coronavirus research as a clear bioweapon. An essential talk, gaining millions of views on Twitter in just a few hours:

https://twitter.com/KimDotcom/status/1661698114917646336?t=9XSo3mN297J94JSigOaz2Q&s=35

Expand full comment
author

The problem is nanotechnology, not the virus. He was watched by millions while he talked about virus patents. People are being killed and damaged by nanotechnology

Expand full comment

The patents he talked about prove that the coronavirus was being manipulated for gain of function, and as an excuse to introduce a deadly bioweapon vaccine. Whether the "vaccine" was made using nanotechnology (which it was) or not does not affect the illegality of the act of developing and forcing use of such a monstrosity. Martin is clearly making a case based on the limitations of legal argument, for the purpose of stopping this gain of function, DNA/RNA patenting, jab mandating activity.

Expand full comment
author

No, it was not a virus,. I just added some research on the translocation of nanotech / graphene. It was never a virus problem. Poisoned people have low immunity, so the flu or cold can be fatal. In addition, graphene accumulates in the lungs and crosses all blood barriers

Expand full comment

Thanks for the follow-up. I have seen both sides of this argument, "yes there is graphene in the lipid nanoparticles", "no there isn't, but the components are there and when the proper G5 cellphone repeater frequency is broadcast it will automatically assemble in the body", and flat-out "haven't found any graphene under microscopic or chemical analysis". Also, some say that there are many different formulas of vaxxxes out there, even some placebo, so could be anything. In any case, Martin's effort to make his case against development of bioweapons and gain of function research is praiseworthy, and by drawing attention to this abomination, if it does turn out that graphene content is proven to the the bad guy, then that can be taken up as a further target of bioweapon development prosecution.

Expand full comment

So I asked the right question last time if in the diagram WE WERE / ARE the bio nano things? This is over my head and getting to be too much. for me.

Expand full comment

The push to use RNA injections to "cure" disease states will not go away. Billions and Billions are being invested. They are playing with the blueprint of life and the risk of destroying life as we know it goes up each day they continue down this road. The great harm that transpired with the Covid con, will not end. Too much profit to be had by the pushers! https://thomasabraunrph.substack.com/p/moderna-sees-the-mrna-future

Expand full comment

Thanks OH for expanding Ana’’s post.

You sure took this and ran with it. How the heck does one counter this fast coming train with its spider web facets( seems to have arrived and is already smashing life as is natural)

To Not comply is a course of action, yet here I am on this and other writers posts as to warnings of these many facets aiming at the control of all life on earth, attempting to discern and learn in hopes of preventing any or all of this horrid crap. I have peace, yet calmly and not do calmly sharing this information with live in person people has been an exercise in futility for me.

Hugs to all but especially the few who can see all this in motion.

Expand full comment

The bitchute version she attached seems to have been sped up - 47 mins long cf. 1h:22 on both rumble https://rumble.com/v2gs5yo-dr.-ian-akyildiz-injecting-programmable-mrna-bio-nano-scale-machines.html and youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YAtQFkEg5-w

Expand full comment