11 Comments

Great link! Thank you!

Expand full comment

PCR Tests are 100% inaccurate: The Virus Does Not Exist

The PCR 'test' was a way to introduce other foreign toxins deep into your nose:

"COVID-19 diagnostic tests are sterilized with a substance called ethylene oxide (EtO), which has been linked to cancer".

Some PCRs have been identified as containing graphene oxide - as have the blue masks.

Here it appears they were selling GO as a 'detection' tool:

A graphene oxide coated tapered microfiber acting as a super-sensor for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2

https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/lc/d0lc01231a

The ultimate humiliation test was the anal swab:

China subjects some travelers to anal swabs, angering foreign governments.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/04/world/asia/china-anal-swab-tests.html

"Some travellers" were a group of US diplomats.

Expand full comment

apparently the HIVers termed it “PC NOT”

Expand full comment

Very reminiscent of a 1920's black and white spoof silent movie of fecklessness much like the Keystone Cops, only this time it's the medical mob.

Expand full comment

🤬

Expand full comment

Imagine a million of these hoaxes being orchestrated whilst the grid is under attach. With fires raging across murica.

Imagine our demise is eminently close.

Imagine the invaders slaughtering people like during the civil war. Imagine leaving all these realms of evil and harboring love void of evil. That’s where I’m at whilst observing this fuking clown show called humanity..

Expand full comment

Nothing has changed since I used them in a path lab. It was 50/50 back in 2005 too.

Expand full comment

Since the virus was not isolated, what were they calibrated for?

Expand full comment

The ones in the Army? It was to save money on one of the analysers, if positive test ect. I think we use to do 8 or 10 PCR tests per sample it was all recorded... long time ago. Using blood.

Who knows what it's really calibrated for. Today Its loaded with hydrogel and blinking particles that's for sure

Expand full comment

EXACTLY. QUESTIONS THAT NOBODY ASKS.

And people should.

It's for delivery, not for testing.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/?fbclid=IwAR3G6Fuq8C-8XW7szL43scbKOYFx78irq52A6ZQCRdZmPMWiHTqD_2jv4Zo

IRRATIONAL TEST RESULTS

Remarkably, in the instruction manuals of PCR tests we can also read that they are not intended as a diagnostic test, as for instance in those by Altona Diagnostics and Creative Diagnostics[5].

To quote another one, in the product announcement of the LightMix Modular Assays produced by TIB Molbiol — which were developed using the Corman et al. protocol — and distributed by Roche we can read:

These assays are not intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of coronavirus infection”

And:

For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.”

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1403570/000149315221010243/form10-q.htm#V_009

QDs used in fluorescent markers in diagnostic applications.

https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1119251 Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions

Research shows that nanoparticles deposited in the nose can make their way directly into the brain.

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

GFNs (graphene-family nanomaterials) can be delivered into bodies by intratracheal instillation, oral administration, intravenous injection, intraperitoneal injection and subcutaneous injection.)

Expand full comment