“A recent study of particular objects known as "nanotubes," revered for their extraordinary strength and electrical conductivity, demonstrated that such objects tend to clump within the lungs, causing suffocation.”
Buckmeister Fuller is the father of Bucky Balls! He was ahead of his times! It’s been down hill since because we are full steam ahead and we have made the human race the Guinea pigs!
Bucky Fuller was an ardent supported of many of the tenets of transhumanism. I do not for a moment believe that he had negative intentions. But he was enamored with the idea of 'technology as savior'. For example, he would have loved and cheered for the Internet of Things and the Internet of Bodies.
1) the ScIeNcE™️ is engaging in a shit ton of unnecessary animal abuse on a regular basis
2) these so-called scientists are completely desensitized from the abuse and the fact that they are playing God.
- both points are equally disturbing. Putting ANYTHING into the body that isn't natural is going to have negative effects. We don't need "tHe ScIeNcE™️" to conduct barbaric & torturous experiments to tell us this. Its all disgusting.
The biggest problem with science is that it focuses only on figuring out whether we CAN, without any discussion or debate on whether we SHOULD.
I once read a very lenghty article trying to answer why certain things (in history, in science...) happen, why people do certain things (most often stupid, cruel, irresponsible etc). And the end conclusion was very simple: because they CAN. Because it's possible. I never forgot about that. I guess it's what you are also saying.
Wow interesting. This is something I bring up often.... I should put this phrase into a frame and hang it up lol "just because we CAN, doesn't mean we SHOULD".
Anyway, you don't happen to have a link to that article do you?
As a person who has nearly died of an asthma attack I can understand the horrors of suffocation. I did an article on graphene also as it was found in some vaccine lots. It's really nasty stuff whether injected, inhaled, or you just get it on your skin.
Bacca400, do you know if the graphene is basically a component of the hydrogel? I have read that some vaccines have hydrogel in them, & I follow a lot of researchers & doctors who believe the c19 jab also has graphene (hydrogel?)...however, there’s this one doctor who is on GETTR & has his own substack, I won’t divulge his name, but he seems to think the jabs do not have graphene. & I can’t figure out why he believes this. It seems apparent they do have this nasty ingredient. Do you have a link for your definitive proof? Also, I hope your asthma is better!
> do you know if the graphene is basically a component of the hydrogel?
No I do not know that. Experienced people know that other ingredients will "hide" toxic components like graphene. I wonder what they call the mercury compound Thimerosol in all vaccines now? Sometimes they just rename things, sometimes they hide the toxin in another compound ingredient.
The graphene may be in some batches but not others. While COVID vaccine jars were labeled with lot numbers, the little jars were not serialized which is required by US law, so that could be considered fraud.
Bacca400, wow, thx for all those...I definitely want to pull up all those links. I may have seen a few of those you sent bcuz it was my understanding that the graphene is in the hydrogel. It’s prob pretty safe to say it is in all or some of them. Yes, disgusting. & also wow, that’s an interesting detail about the serial numbers. I recently found out my 20 year old son took two moderna jabs even after I incessantly warned him, & even after he had been granted a religious exemption from his college. I was so devastated & mad & of course, now worried! Ugh. He was tired of testing weekly at his school & he needed the jab to get into a stupid concert arena. I have no way of knowing what poisons were really in his vial. So, that is so interesting to know that about the serial #, yep, sounds like fraud to me! I’m giving my son some bromelain & NaC & serrapeptase & nattokinase. I may also get ivermectin & chlorine dioxide. & I’m trying to see if his doctor will order a troponin & d-dimer test. Oh, I despise these evil rats who did this to us people, all I can do is pray & try to counter the bad effects of the jab for my son. I have to do something, cuz I don’t want his first symptom to be a cardiac event which could maybe be too late! Ugh. Thx for your thoughts! 🙏🏻
And herein lies our opportunity, as these nutzoids are so drunk with power (can you say "Operation Barbarossa," anyone?) they have just put the seeds of their own destruction in their offensive. I believe that, despite the threat of AI, it still can never rise above the **presuppositions** originally placed in its core code. Pretty similar to the Nazis, who had similar tech for the day - the Me262 jet, the heavy water for the A-Bomb, etc.
There is another issue: they rely on AI believing that it will not make a computational error.
Well, true, they have in their hands a very powerful kill switch with nanotechnology and 5G, but there are always details that may not have been calculated.
Yes, like how do they ultimately protect themselves from the weapon? Especially as they consider self-replicating vaccine technologies (at first among wildlife)? Do they think they have the ultimate antidote?
It must be also observed that 5G can turn graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide, and the latter kills a lot faster.
Also, what is the toxicity level of NLHs (nano-lipid hydrogels)?
My impression is that most of "covid" is a combination of graphene and 5G, but lots of other factors are playing a role, because it would be too easy to identify the criminal intent.
General poisoning is nothing new, but in 2020, it took a new turn. The complexity of the attack on humanity is amazing:
Dr. Richard Fleming, PhD., MD, JD, who is a physicist and nuclear cardiologist, looking for contaminants in the shot, reported here https://www.truthforhealth.org/faith-over-fear/ (see replay on archive there) that he did NOT find graphene oxide, “hydras,” “parasites,” or “micro-circuitry” in early 2023, but has found rapid blood clotting after the COVID shots, amyloid infiltration of the heart leading to congestive heart failure, particulate contaminants in the vials of COVID shots that should not be there, as well as sodium chloride crystals, and high concentrations of lipid nanoparticles in the blood that cause inflammatory damage to organs throughout the body. Dr. Ryan Cole also says he has not found GO. However, other scientists claimed to have found graphene as well https://expose-news.com/2022/12/01/graphene-nano-covid-vaccines-scientists-worldwide/?cmid=bd8850b2-dc56-40a5-a325-e56c7ab3d286
Maybe it is in some, not all? Intentionally? Does this account for the variation in death/injury by lots?
The problem is that many white coats are pushing the viral theory, instead of saying that these C-19 and C-19 "vaccine" people were simply poisoned.
I think a lot of people in the so-called opposition may not be the opposition at all. They are most likely doing their job to take their seats at these conferences and control the narrative: not to let the dirty secret of nano get out.
That's why they talk a lot about the virus, statistics, injuries, Ivermectin and so on. Not that all of these things aren't true or good - but their goal is to divert attention from the heart of the crime: the toxicity of nanotechnology (in connection with 5G, of course, because nanotechnology is a semiconductor).
And this is why people ABSOLUTELY cannot rely on authority, they MUST use critical thinking!
2.
Graphene is used in masks and PCR tests, and in chemtrails, food, etc. This is easy to research.
Since graphene is already in the body, it doesn't necessarily still need to be delivered to form these nanostructures. It could be other nanotechnologies and materials. Hydrogel can serve as an adhesive - a glue.
But many researchers have seen it under microscope, using Raman spectroscopy, etc. (a powerful tool for determining chemical species).
There is also saline, which also has nanotechnology in it, which is used along with this injection. It too contains nanotechnology, graphene. The question is whether they have also studied this saline.
The conclusion is that you can't see the electric power, but you can see its effect on the equipment. If your phone is charging, then you know the power is there.
These nanomaterials have specific mechanisms of toxicity, and they are present in the so-called Covid and manifest themselves as adverse reactions after injection.
Thanks so much. Great work you are doing. A couple concerns, however.
a.) First, yes, no doubt the graphene is in the masks, geoengineering ad nauseam. And no doubt they are fiddling with nano everything.
b.) I do, with all due respect, have a concern with "And this is why people ABSOLUTELY cannot rely on authority, they MUST use critical thinking!" IMHO, authority is a start point, but as Einstein said "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” Or again, relative to 100 Scientists Against Einstein, that the Nazis put out, he reported said "Why 100? If their facts are right, only one is needed." And Thomas Kuhn's seminal The Structure of Scientific Revolution hits the point you are making precisely. So... you say we "must use critical thinking." But that, mon ami, is quo erat demonstrandum. I.e., of course that is true, but what IS the critical thinking you are referring to? I am thinking of doing a paper on epistemology at my Att Viska site, for clearly that is the point of contention.
c.) The other problem I have is that of controlled opposition. Certainly, that is true. The filth, evil and corruption is beyond belief. Hence, the value of what you are (so very well!!) doing. But how far down the rabbit hole are we going to go with "controlled opposition?" Might I call you, yourself, that? Or me?!? How did the French Resistance in WWII deal with this question? Who was a double agent? A triple agent? Who was a resistance member, but got turned? Seems to me this "controlled opposition" contention is there for a reason - it is a sticky wicket. But what we CAN do is look at the internal logic of arguments; we can follow the money (the fasco-Marxists LUUUUV their money!! After all, if there is no God, all they have is the present; after that, like the evil Prof. Weston in CS Lewis' Perelanda, is the ability to cling to the rind of what is left of their sorry lives in this world. I can and do look to authority as an initial guide, but no more than that. Even Einstein said he was wrong about quantum theory. And as Einstein also said, "The important thing is to never stop questioning” (this is, of course, until, there is BIG MONEY and the fasco-Marxist cancel culture involved. Then they would even shout down Einstein and cancel his Twitter and YouTube access). Or as Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman (The Meaning of it All) wrote: “Science is a process for learning about nature in which competing ideas about how the world works are measured against observations.” –
So, anyhow, GREAT work you are doing!! Thanks for the labour of love!
I mean do not blindly follow. I accept authorities, but they need to be checked. Don't accept blindly, just because it's the opposition, or speaks so wisely, or something like that.
One must listen and observe, read, pray - not be deceived one way or the other.
Absolutely there are authorities, but it is important to listen to those very people who are actually authorities and have good intentions.
Critical thinking: questioning, analyzing, interpreting and making judgments about what you read, hear, say or write - DON'T ACCEPT BLINDLY.
- point C
When someone comes as a friend but is an enemy, he is even worse than an open enemy.
He stabs you in the back.
It's not about someone who may be wrong, or still afraid and therefore doesn't say everything, or something is holding him back.
It's about people who are part of this conspiracy against humanity but pretend to be friends of humanity.
Excellent. Yes, I need to do something on epistemology... we are at that point now.... So what you are saying is, as Taylor Caldwell wrote (often misattributed to Cicero)
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
And such a person also infiltrates the growing opposition. In fact, he or she - or them can lead the opposition to where the group wants it to go.
This is war and strategy.
There really is an insidious plan to kill people with nano weapons (an unbelievable, incomprehensible Trojan horse for so many something people have no idea about, and it will take them a long time to learn about it, especially since it is something practically invisible, and even more to believe it).
And yet such a person stands at the head of the opposition, loudly shouting against it, while it is his/her/their invention.
Yes. But the whole thing ferreting out these folks is probably more art than science.
I really need to get an article done on epistemology. I keep wondering how the French, or German, resistance did it (e.g., think Sophie Scholl and the White Rose group, or the von Stauffenberg plot to kill Hitler - both of which failed in the short term.)
Anyhow, LOVE what you are doing!! May God bless you and your work!!
We have been in this situation many times before in history. This one is unprecedented, because we are dealing with a unique technology.
Will we be able to survive it?
YES.
"For the soul there is never birth nor death. Nor, having once been, does he ever cease to be. He is unborn, eternal, ever-existing, undying and primeval. He is not slain when the body is slain." (BG 2:20)
or as Shakespeare put it:
"All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances..."
And then the wardrobe attendant comes and takes away the costume.
'TheScience' trains to always ignore, as well as ridicule, belittle and laugh at intuition.
Ironically, the better one gets at hearing/seeing/feeling their own intuition, the more 'Right' your whole life feels. The sense of Flow dramatically increases. Synchronicities occur hundreds of times each day. Gratitude permeates your being at all times. Life becomes a sort of fantasyland, and you feel like a child in it. Yet, you retain all your talents, abilities, education, experience, etc. Your motivations change. Your sense of meaning, and how you derive it, becomes totally integrated.
Your intuition is the source of your imagination and creativity, the highest gifts you possess in your life.
So yeah, when TheScience and their sycophants dismiss your own personal intuitive guidance, you can tell them where to get off.
Ok, after 2+ years of reading medical journals and studies daily for a minimum of an hour but sometimes 4hrs or more, due to the fact that my 10 yr old was in the cardiac icu and in the hospital for 9 days, diagnosed with MIS-C, myocarditis, acute kidney failure, thrombocytopenia, lymphocytopenia, anemia, heart failure - and many more issues, I have to say...I CANNOT AGREE MORE with outraged human’s conclusions.
For anyone wondering, my daughter is now doing remarkably well, I am so glad I went outside on my own for answers or I don’t believe she would be where she is now.
I wanted to add a specific anecdotal point here:
We had to see 3 departments at least 1 time per month for a full year post hospital - infectious diseases, cardiology and rheumatology. The rheumatology Dr. Is an M.D./Ph.D. Because Mis-C has lots of similarities to a longer known syndrome “Kawasaki Disease” - I was curious about the potential role of air born toxins as a causal source for MIS-C.
When I asked the rheumatologist about this potential link, she looked at us and firmly told my daughter not to worry about the air, going outside, etc....dismiss this idea completely. HUGE CLUE.
The only thing all 3 departments did for a year at every visit was lecture us about getting vaccinated. The only thing. When I brought up how I was already trying to heal my daughter from “spike protein” so why would I go get more, they could never answer and would just pass me off to the next department to start the lecture from scratch. I endlessly heard them say, for hours on end...”we don’t understand the virus, because it’s new and will take years to study, but (illogically) we 100% know that the vaccine is the only thing you should do to treat your symptoms.” Absolutely nuts and just basic deductive reasoning is all that is needed to know that they were lying.
One of the many things I’ve learned, is that modern medicine loves “viruses” because they are “mysterious and ambiguous and complex” but they don’t ever seem interested in environmental factors nor nutrient panels. They didn’t even check my daughters vitamin d levels nor micronutrient levels. I had her lymphocytes cultured outside of the hospital system and she was critically low on vitamin d and others when she got sick.
My point is that we have an entire system that is so sick itself that we’ll educated doctors are both corrupt and willing to convince themselves that it is acceptable to study only areas and treatments that they can monetize; and any real answers (often simple and obvious and free or cheap) are avoided by them at all costs. They are the anti-doctors, they are abusive sociopaths, willing to kill children and convinced they are doing the right thing, having divorced themselves from honest inquiry, shutting down any human empathy and curiosity, they think their conclusions are rational but they are only rational because they rigged the system and are making conclusions based on absolute fraudulent foundations.
Yes, Outraged Human, we must use critical thinking....not even the educated doctors (and researchers (for the most part) are doing this whatsoever!!!
What do you think of the director of La Quinta Columna being interviewed on nanoparticles, including the existence of GO. Graphene certainly is being explored for work with medical technology – see the NIH article , or article from ScienceDirect
I see from Skywater Technology that DARPA is involved in development of Carbon Nanotube. It seems the DoD is running our country.
Thank you for this excellent research.
Buckmeister Fuller is the father of Bucky Balls! He was ahead of his times! It’s been down hill since because we are full steam ahead and we have made the human race the Guinea pigs!
Yes, with the intention of killing in a very sneaky way
Are we really sure that killing is the intention? I think they're testing out the technology and really want it to work so that humans can be integrated into the IoT etc. as per this other article by Outraged Human https://open.substack.com/pub/outraged/p/nano-tiny-yet-so-powerful?r=o6faa&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Bucky Fuller was an ardent supported of many of the tenets of transhumanism. I do not for a moment believe that he had negative intentions. But he was enamored with the idea of 'technology as savior'. For example, he would have loved and cheered for the Internet of Things and the Internet of Bodies.
The ONLY thing these experiments show is:
1) the ScIeNcE™️ is engaging in a shit ton of unnecessary animal abuse on a regular basis
2) these so-called scientists are completely desensitized from the abuse and the fact that they are playing God.
- both points are equally disturbing. Putting ANYTHING into the body that isn't natural is going to have negative effects. We don't need "tHe ScIeNcE™️" to conduct barbaric & torturous experiments to tell us this. Its all disgusting.
The biggest problem with science is that it focuses only on figuring out whether we CAN, without any discussion or debate on whether we SHOULD.
I once read a very lenghty article trying to answer why certain things (in history, in science...) happen, why people do certain things (most often stupid, cruel, irresponsible etc). And the end conclusion was very simple: because they CAN. Because it's possible. I never forgot about that. I guess it's what you are also saying.
Ego.
Always. F**king. Ego.
Wow interesting. This is something I bring up often.... I should put this phrase into a frame and hang it up lol "just because we CAN, doesn't mean we SHOULD".
Anyway, you don't happen to have a link to that article do you?
No, sorry, I don't remember the title nor the author. It was quite a long time ago, but the conclusion stroke me, so at least I remembered that. ;-)
As a person who has nearly died of an asthma attack I can understand the horrors of suffocation. I did an article on graphene also as it was found in some vaccine lots. It's really nasty stuff whether injected, inhaled, or you just get it on your skin.
Bacca400, do you know if the graphene is basically a component of the hydrogel? I have read that some vaccines have hydrogel in them, & I follow a lot of researchers & doctors who believe the c19 jab also has graphene (hydrogel?)...however, there’s this one doctor who is on GETTR & has his own substack, I won’t divulge his name, but he seems to think the jabs do not have graphene. & I can’t figure out why he believes this. It seems apparent they do have this nasty ingredient. Do you have a link for your definitive proof? Also, I hope your asthma is better!
Ok, graphene might be a component of some hydrogels.
Koki Yoshida, Hiroaki Onoe, in Advances in Chemical Engineering, 2021. From a book, chapter 5: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0065237721000016
"Graphene oxide-incorporated hydrogels for biomedical applications." Some hydrogels contain graphene. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41428-020-0350-9
Some hydrogels contain graphene. "Preparation, Properties, and Applications of Graphene-Based Hydrogels". https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2018.00450/full
Wow! And many more studies and articles here: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+hydrogel+made+of+%2Bgraphene&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS975US975&ei=04DqY4fVAtOGptQPm8mawAs&ved=0ahUKEwjHitHhj5P9AhVTg4kEHZukBrgQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=what+is+hydrogel+made+of+%2Bgraphene&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzoKCAAQRxDWBBCwAzoJCAAQFhAeEPEEOgUIABCGAzoFCCEQoAE6BQghEKsCOggIIRAWEB4QHToKCCEQFhAeEA8QHToLCCEQFhAeEPEEEB1KBAhBGABKBAhGGABQtgVYrBVgvyNoA3ABeACAAV-IAdcFkgECMTKYAQCgAQHIAQjAAQE&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
And a search for more articles about hydrogels with graphene in vaccines: https://www.google.com/search?q=what+is+hydrogel+made+of+%2Bgraphene+vaccine&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS975US975&ei=PILqY9nBJZCiptQPx--LqAc&ved=0ahUKEwjZz4WOkZP9AhUQkYkEHcf3AnUQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=what+is+hydrogel+made+of+%2Bgraphene+vaccine&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzoKCAAQRxDWBBCwA0oECEEYAEoECEYYAFCeBVi6C2CyDGgBcAF4AIABP4gB_gKSAQE4mAEAoAEByAEIwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
> do you know if the graphene is basically a component of the hydrogel?
No I do not know that. Experienced people know that other ingredients will "hide" toxic components like graphene. I wonder what they call the mercury compound Thimerosol in all vaccines now? Sometimes they just rename things, sometimes they hide the toxin in another compound ingredient.
The graphene may be in some batches but not others. While COVID vaccine jars were labeled with lot numbers, the little jars were not serialized which is required by US law, so that could be considered fraud.
No I don't think I have definitive proof of graphene in the vaccines but you can look here for more info: https://wordsalad.info/tag-graphene.html
Bacca400, wow, thx for all those...I definitely want to pull up all those links. I may have seen a few of those you sent bcuz it was my understanding that the graphene is in the hydrogel. It’s prob pretty safe to say it is in all or some of them. Yes, disgusting. & also wow, that’s an interesting detail about the serial numbers. I recently found out my 20 year old son took two moderna jabs even after I incessantly warned him, & even after he had been granted a religious exemption from his college. I was so devastated & mad & of course, now worried! Ugh. He was tired of testing weekly at his school & he needed the jab to get into a stupid concert arena. I have no way of knowing what poisons were really in his vial. So, that is so interesting to know that about the serial #, yep, sounds like fraud to me! I’m giving my son some bromelain & NaC & serrapeptase & nattokinase. I may also get ivermectin & chlorine dioxide. & I’m trying to see if his doctor will order a troponin & d-dimer test. Oh, I despise these evil rats who did this to us people, all I can do is pray & try to counter the bad effects of the jab for my son. I have to do something, cuz I don’t want his first symptom to be a cardiac event which could maybe be too late! Ugh. Thx for your thoughts! 🙏🏻
Thanks. ( my head’s spinning a bit, again)
You know what give me hope? This article, "Woke ChatGPT; Google will compete to be even more woke" : https://www.zerohedge.com/political/google-roll-out-chatgpt-rival-powered-sentient-ai
And herein lies our opportunity, as these nutzoids are so drunk with power (can you say "Operation Barbarossa," anyone?) they have just put the seeds of their own destruction in their offensive. I believe that, despite the threat of AI, it still can never rise above the **presuppositions** originally placed in its core code. Pretty similar to the Nazis, who had similar tech for the day - the Me262 jet, the heavy water for the A-Bomb, etc.
There is another issue: they rely on AI believing that it will not make a computational error.
Well, true, they have in their hands a very powerful kill switch with nanotechnology and 5G, but there are always details that may not have been calculated.
So, they decided to give it a try.
Yes, like how do they ultimately protect themselves from the weapon? Especially as they consider self-replicating vaccine technologies (at first among wildlife)? Do they think they have the ultimate antidote?
Insha'Allah
Well, we shall see.
It must be also observed that 5G can turn graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide, and the latter kills a lot faster.
Also, what is the toxicity level of NLHs (nano-lipid hydrogels)?
My impression is that most of "covid" is a combination of graphene and 5G, but lots of other factors are playing a role, because it would be too easy to identify the criminal intent.
General poisoning is nothing new, but in 2020, it took a new turn. The complexity of the attack on humanity is amazing:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-summary-of-general-poisoning
Dr. Richard Fleming, PhD., MD, JD, who is a physicist and nuclear cardiologist, looking for contaminants in the shot, reported here https://www.truthforhealth.org/faith-over-fear/ (see replay on archive there) that he did NOT find graphene oxide, “hydras,” “parasites,” or “micro-circuitry” in early 2023, but has found rapid blood clotting after the COVID shots, amyloid infiltration of the heart leading to congestive heart failure, particulate contaminants in the vials of COVID shots that should not be there, as well as sodium chloride crystals, and high concentrations of lipid nanoparticles in the blood that cause inflammatory damage to organs throughout the body. Dr. Ryan Cole also says he has not found GO. However, other scientists claimed to have found graphene as well https://expose-news.com/2022/12/01/graphene-nano-covid-vaccines-scientists-worldwide/?cmid=bd8850b2-dc56-40a5-a325-e56c7ab3d286
Maybe it is in some, not all? Intentionally? Does this account for the variation in death/injury by lots?
I will respond in two ways:
1.
The problem is that many white coats are pushing the viral theory, instead of saying that these C-19 and C-19 "vaccine" people were simply poisoned.
I think a lot of people in the so-called opposition may not be the opposition at all. They are most likely doing their job to take their seats at these conferences and control the narrative: not to let the dirty secret of nano get out.
That's why they talk a lot about the virus, statistics, injuries, Ivermectin and so on. Not that all of these things aren't true or good - but their goal is to divert attention from the heart of the crime: the toxicity of nanotechnology (in connection with 5G, of course, because nanotechnology is a semiconductor).
And this is why people ABSOLUTELY cannot rely on authority, they MUST use critical thinking!
2.
Graphene is used in masks and PCR tests, and in chemtrails, food, etc. This is easy to research.
Since graphene is already in the body, it doesn't necessarily still need to be delivered to form these nanostructures. It could be other nanotechnologies and materials. Hydrogel can serve as an adhesive - a glue.
But many researchers have seen it under microscope, using Raman spectroscopy, etc. (a powerful tool for determining chemical species).
There is also saline, which also has nanotechnology in it, which is used along with this injection. It too contains nanotechnology, graphene. The question is whether they have also studied this saline.
The conclusion is that you can't see the electric power, but you can see its effect on the equipment. If your phone is charging, then you know the power is there.
These nanomaterials have specific mechanisms of toxicity, and they are present in the so-called Covid and manifest themselves as adverse reactions after injection.
So, you can draw the right conclusions.
Absolutely right about the controlled opposition
Thanks so much. Great work you are doing. A couple concerns, however.
a.) First, yes, no doubt the graphene is in the masks, geoengineering ad nauseam. And no doubt they are fiddling with nano everything.
b.) I do, with all due respect, have a concern with "And this is why people ABSOLUTELY cannot rely on authority, they MUST use critical thinking!" IMHO, authority is a start point, but as Einstein said "No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” Or again, relative to 100 Scientists Against Einstein, that the Nazis put out, he reported said "Why 100? If their facts are right, only one is needed." And Thomas Kuhn's seminal The Structure of Scientific Revolution hits the point you are making precisely. So... you say we "must use critical thinking." But that, mon ami, is quo erat demonstrandum. I.e., of course that is true, but what IS the critical thinking you are referring to? I am thinking of doing a paper on epistemology at my Att Viska site, for clearly that is the point of contention.
c.) The other problem I have is that of controlled opposition. Certainly, that is true. The filth, evil and corruption is beyond belief. Hence, the value of what you are (so very well!!) doing. But how far down the rabbit hole are we going to go with "controlled opposition?" Might I call you, yourself, that? Or me?!? How did the French Resistance in WWII deal with this question? Who was a double agent? A triple agent? Who was a resistance member, but got turned? Seems to me this "controlled opposition" contention is there for a reason - it is a sticky wicket. But what we CAN do is look at the internal logic of arguments; we can follow the money (the fasco-Marxists LUUUUV their money!! After all, if there is no God, all they have is the present; after that, like the evil Prof. Weston in CS Lewis' Perelanda, is the ability to cling to the rind of what is left of their sorry lives in this world. I can and do look to authority as an initial guide, but no more than that. Even Einstein said he was wrong about quantum theory. And as Einstein also said, "The important thing is to never stop questioning” (this is, of course, until, there is BIG MONEY and the fasco-Marxist cancel culture involved. Then they would even shout down Einstein and cancel his Twitter and YouTube access). Or as Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman (The Meaning of it All) wrote: “Science is a process for learning about nature in which competing ideas about how the world works are measured against observations.” –
So, anyhow, GREAT work you are doing!! Thanks for the labour of love!
- I respond to point B
I mean do not blindly follow. I accept authorities, but they need to be checked. Don't accept blindly, just because it's the opposition, or speaks so wisely, or something like that.
One must listen and observe, read, pray - not be deceived one way or the other.
Absolutely there are authorities, but it is important to listen to those very people who are actually authorities and have good intentions.
Critical thinking: questioning, analyzing, interpreting and making judgments about what you read, hear, say or write - DON'T ACCEPT BLINDLY.
- point C
When someone comes as a friend but is an enemy, he is even worse than an open enemy.
He stabs you in the back.
It's not about someone who may be wrong, or still afraid and therefore doesn't say everything, or something is holding him back.
It's about people who are part of this conspiracy against humanity but pretend to be friends of humanity.
Excellent. Yes, I need to do something on epistemology... we are at that point now.... So what you are saying is, as Taylor Caldwell wrote (often misattributed to Cicero)
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
And such a person also infiltrates the growing opposition. In fact, he or she - or them can lead the opposition to where the group wants it to go.
This is war and strategy.
There really is an insidious plan to kill people with nano weapons (an unbelievable, incomprehensible Trojan horse for so many something people have no idea about, and it will take them a long time to learn about it, especially since it is something practically invisible, and even more to believe it).
And yet such a person stands at the head of the opposition, loudly shouting against it, while it is his/her/their invention.
Do you get my point?
Yes. But the whole thing ferreting out these folks is probably more art than science.
I really need to get an article done on epistemology. I keep wondering how the French, or German, resistance did it (e.g., think Sophie Scholl and the White Rose group, or the von Stauffenberg plot to kill Hitler - both of which failed in the short term.)
Anyhow, LOVE what you are doing!! May God bless you and your work!!
We have been in this situation many times before in history. This one is unprecedented, because we are dealing with a unique technology.
Will we be able to survive it?
YES.
"For the soul there is never birth nor death. Nor, having once been, does he ever cease to be. He is unborn, eternal, ever-existing, undying and primeval. He is not slain when the body is slain." (BG 2:20)
or as Shakespeare put it:
"All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances..."
And then the wardrobe attendant comes and takes away the costume.
Intuition.
We all have it. Nearly all of us ignore it.
'TheScience' trains to always ignore, as well as ridicule, belittle and laugh at intuition.
Ironically, the better one gets at hearing/seeing/feeling their own intuition, the more 'Right' your whole life feels. The sense of Flow dramatically increases. Synchronicities occur hundreds of times each day. Gratitude permeates your being at all times. Life becomes a sort of fantasyland, and you feel like a child in it. Yet, you retain all your talents, abilities, education, experience, etc. Your motivations change. Your sense of meaning, and how you derive it, becomes totally integrated.
Your intuition is the source of your imagination and creativity, the highest gifts you possess in your life.
So yeah, when TheScience and their sycophants dismiss your own personal intuitive guidance, you can tell them where to get off.
Good point
Ok, after 2+ years of reading medical journals and studies daily for a minimum of an hour but sometimes 4hrs or more, due to the fact that my 10 yr old was in the cardiac icu and in the hospital for 9 days, diagnosed with MIS-C, myocarditis, acute kidney failure, thrombocytopenia, lymphocytopenia, anemia, heart failure - and many more issues, I have to say...I CANNOT AGREE MORE with outraged human’s conclusions.
For anyone wondering, my daughter is now doing remarkably well, I am so glad I went outside on my own for answers or I don’t believe she would be where she is now.
I wanted to add a specific anecdotal point here:
We had to see 3 departments at least 1 time per month for a full year post hospital - infectious diseases, cardiology and rheumatology. The rheumatology Dr. Is an M.D./Ph.D. Because Mis-C has lots of similarities to a longer known syndrome “Kawasaki Disease” - I was curious about the potential role of air born toxins as a causal source for MIS-C.
When I asked the rheumatologist about this potential link, she looked at us and firmly told my daughter not to worry about the air, going outside, etc....dismiss this idea completely. HUGE CLUE.
The only thing all 3 departments did for a year at every visit was lecture us about getting vaccinated. The only thing. When I brought up how I was already trying to heal my daughter from “spike protein” so why would I go get more, they could never answer and would just pass me off to the next department to start the lecture from scratch. I endlessly heard them say, for hours on end...”we don’t understand the virus, because it’s new and will take years to study, but (illogically) we 100% know that the vaccine is the only thing you should do to treat your symptoms.” Absolutely nuts and just basic deductive reasoning is all that is needed to know that they were lying.
One of the many things I’ve learned, is that modern medicine loves “viruses” because they are “mysterious and ambiguous and complex” but they don’t ever seem interested in environmental factors nor nutrient panels. They didn’t even check my daughters vitamin d levels nor micronutrient levels. I had her lymphocytes cultured outside of the hospital system and she was critically low on vitamin d and others when she got sick.
My point is that we have an entire system that is so sick itself that we’ll educated doctors are both corrupt and willing to convince themselves that it is acceptable to study only areas and treatments that they can monetize; and any real answers (often simple and obvious and free or cheap) are avoided by them at all costs. They are the anti-doctors, they are abusive sociopaths, willing to kill children and convinced they are doing the right thing, having divorced themselves from honest inquiry, shutting down any human empathy and curiosity, they think their conclusions are rational but they are only rational because they rigged the system and are making conclusions based on absolute fraudulent foundations.
Yes, Outraged Human, we must use critical thinking....not even the educated doctors (and researchers (for the most part) are doing this whatsoever!!!
Thanks. Will look at link now
What do you think of the director of La Quinta Columna being interviewed on nanoparticles, including the existence of GO. Graphene certainly is being explored for work with medical technology – see the NIH article , or article from ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468519420301452
https://www.laquintacolumna.net/
Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea, PhD, MD, feels there are other heavy metals, such as tungsten involved as well https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/mark-steele-on-5g-nanotechnology?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=956088&post_id=100938076&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
I've been saying for over 2 years that Covid is caused by nanotech (activated by 5G?) and it got me banned from Twitter a year ago.