10 Comments

Thorough, as usual.

Isn't it possible that destroyed and damaged red blood cells are also playing a major role in hurting and killing people (both injected and uninjected)?

All "vaccines" have always been the most harmful with the exception of the ones for "covid." My data are probably obsolete, because as Ana's article shows, they put the poison in probably everything injectable:

https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/human-papilloma-virus-vaccine-hpv

Even the 2019 "flu vaccine" contained the same, just like dental Lidocaine by November, 2021.

The general poisoning is now at full speed, and it encompasses a lot more than just injections:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/bioweapons

Moreover, nobody seems to mention that nobody knows the way some of its elements activate or amplify each other's impact. "Vaccination" through the food supply, GMO mosquitoes, aerosols, and goodness knows what else, is not legit and in use. 5G towers are still causing the symptoms of the non-existent illness, "covid." Turning up the towers of poisoning the water, the air (even more with chemtrails) can create the appearance of a "pandemic" and muzzling, "testing," lockdowns, and injections can be mandated over and over. The method is unpredictable, but the outcome is not:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/who-is-right-and-who-is-wrong

Expand full comment
Sep 2, 2023·edited Sep 2, 2023

Multiplier effects seem usually severe; steep inclines on a graph. Pills + booze. Household chemicals that are fine used singularly but when combined create deadly gasses....creating superbad. Also (more happily) true of cures and especially whole food/medicine cures. Intense synergystic effects. More than the sum of its parts. best Ray

Expand full comment

As a gynecologist I am seeing many biopsies coming back with lichen sclerosus .

Expand full comment

Compare to images of venemous bites, not just snakes, but multiple venoms. Sick. So so sick.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

Whoever does this, should also include the explanation, namely mechanisms of toxicity of used nanotechnology:

Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and

mechanisms | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)

https://particleandfibretoxicology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12989-016-0168-y

Due to their unique physicochemical properties, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) are widely used in many fields, especially in biomedical applications. Currently, many studies have investigated the biocompatibility and toxicity of GFNs in vivo and in intro. Generally, GFNs may exert different degrees of toxicity in animals or cell models by following with different administration routes and penetrating through physiological barriers, subsequently being distributed in tissues or located in cells, eventually being excreted out of the bodies. This review collects studies on the toxic effects of GFNs in several organs and cell models. We also point out that various factors determine the toxicity of GFNs including the lateral size, surface structure, functionalization, charge, impurities, aggregations, and corona effect ect. In addition, several typical mechanisms underlying GFN toxicity have been revealed, for instance, physical destruction, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy, and necrosis.

They pretend they don't know about the negative effects and there's no cause-and-effect relationship. But this is nonsense, of course the reason is the toxicity of the ingredients in this injection. Nanotechnology is toxic

For example

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cia2.12088

The evaluation of oxidative stress in patients with psoriasis vulgaris and atopic dermatitis by measuring the urinary level of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine

Abstract

Objectives

Recent studies have revealed the relationship of oxidative stress to various medical disorders, such as cancer and ischemic heart disease. Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis vulgaris (PV) are chronic inflammatory dermatoses, and oxidative stress is presumed to be involved in the development of these diseases as well as their becoming refractory.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrated an association between urinary 8-OHdG and the development of AD and PV, suggesting that both are oxidative stress-related diseases. Treatments or lifestyle improvements focused on anti-oxidation may therefore be vital for preventing these chronic dermatoses from developing and becoming refractory.

And so on

Expand full comment
author

These are already case reports for people's information; but I suggest you do better.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Expand full comment
author

"It would be nice if someone would write a clear, organized overview of these cases." - Who is "someone"?

You see, I am speaking respectfully, in no way trying to be arrogant. Even in its current form, it took me a few hours. I would like to spend more time on everything, if possible.

For me, the "vomit" is what has been done to these people and what is being imposed on all of us - as you know, they are not finished yet. Why would anyone inject this toxin, this poison - if you compare the side effects of Keytruda, you'll see the same thing (the same side effects because it's almost the same technology) - except there was a warning there, but here they are free from any responsibility.

https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-is-toxic

Expand full comment