Always worried that the horsie farm and I got jabbed too story were to sell himself as one of the guys. Sort of " I got taken too, but now I'm gonna lead you to the promised land, (while becoming the head of the "new reformed" CDC and making a shit ton of money and finally getting the recognition I crave, along with Ms Glasspool)"
I hope to be wrong, but putting two 85 year old experts critical of your work into their Deathbeds by stressing them with a 25 million dollar lawsuit makes you a scumbag in my book..
I don't know enough to make any technical analysis, but from when I first heard of Malone on Brett Weinstein's interview with Kirsch, it made no sense that he was an expert that developed mRNA, yet fell for the vaxx narrative.
Since then there are probably some overstatements and connections made about him that are incorrect, but many that are believable and worth asking for proper answers to.
I can see him suing the Breggins for statements he feels are damaging to him, for $1 + legal fees. When a guy with no shortage of money is suing for $25M, something is very wrong. I can only view it as a mechanism to stifle their free speech.
Despite Shannon Joy apologizing for him incessantly, he creates his own aura of dubiousness that he only has half explanations to.
Also, or being such a moral compass, he generalizes all of New York culture w/a very derogative statement - totally against what he claims are his moral pillars.
Be wary of all messengers unless you can validate their claims.
Eventually Malones masters will throw him under the bus, just as they did Charles M. Lieber. In other words Malone has failed to steer the Medical Freedom Movement in the direction his masters desired. Malones "friends" that apparently threatened he and his family, have failed to sicken or kill Malones opponents. Literally.
All to hide the Nano Technology. That's why Malone only spouts off about the mRNA, and gives no support to the truth tellers.
Malone's day of reckoning is coming, his friend's don't control the 5G or 6G anymore. No more bio drone ticks, no more spraying LNP Quantum dots, no more frequencies for modified variants.
Malone picked the wrong side, just as he did all those years ago, heading on 20 years, against me, using second hand information and Brian wave frequency data. That's what happens when you don't talk to the person involved, personally.
They can't even sue me, for the fear of discovery. So they just ignore me. Time to make more noise.
I should never read before caffeine--whats a “Brian” wave frequency I ask myself. Lmao. Seriously I am embarrassed confess....I looked it up. Note to self: finish the coffee first :)
I was almost started to "cry"....so I couldn't listen till the end. People want clicks and money (him excluded), he tried to alert people about the danger of the faccine (but recomanded for +60), everybody accuse him being part of deep state for nothing.... Malone is trying to correct the people's behaviour, an important point on the future political agenda... well, for those who didn't understand and see yet that the deep state is acting now in plain sight, all over the world, that's not good for stopping the machinery. To hell with all their faccines, malone's too, I do not have any respect and consideration for those "scientists" who put their efforts in inventing things we do not need them and experimenting on people their crazy criminal inventions.
If you inject poison, you simply destroy your immune system. Why would anyone allow themselves to inject poison? It is because of this that people cannot cope with the common cold next time and are very sick or die.
Sun et al. (99) demonstrated that aluminum-based adjuvants can be engineered to optimize their immunostimulatory properties. Specifically, the authors synthesized a library of aluminum oxyhydroxide (AlOOH) nanorods and compared these to commercial alum and could show that shape, crystallinity, and hydroxyl content played an important role in NLRP3 inflammasome activation (99). Rettig et al. (100) provided evidence that particle size may also influence the immune response to “danger.”
Following exposure to GRMs or CBMs, for instance in the case of biomedical applications, the nanomaterials will immediately be recognized by immune cells, the body's first line of defence against exogenous agents. These heterogeneous materials are characterized by a variety of different physicochemical properties, which could modulate their reactivity and interactions with the immune cells [21]. This makes the assessment of their health and safety risks a challenging field and complicates the implementation in translational approaches [22–24].
In this context, the whole family of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), for years compared to asbestos for the hazardous effects shown in terms of lung toxicity [46–48], can be taken as an example. Recently CNTs have been catalogued by the Swedish non-profit organization ChemSec, as chemicals that 'should be restricted or banned in the EU' [49]. The ChemSec generalized evaluation, as highlighted by Heller et al [59] and Fadeel and Kostarelos [60] has contributed to create greater confusion regarding the much-discussed toxicological profile of this class of nanomaterials [50–56]. Indeed, it has been evidenced that, due to its extreme heterogeneity (e.g. different length, diameter, functionalization, etc) [57, 58], the family of CNTs cannot be considered as one material category [59, 60]. Hence a correct and accurate toxicological classification of CNTs and, more in general, of GRMs and CBMs, on the basis of their physicochemical properties, is of priceless importance for their safety evaluation and, consequently, their applications [61, 62].
Interactions with the immune system
The impact of nanomaterials, including graphene on human health, still need to be fully elucidated. A key aspect to ensure a safe use of nanomaterials in our everyday life and their successful applications in biomedicine is represented by the study of interaction with the complex entities of the blood immune cells. Two are the main routes of exposure that may lead to the recognition of blood immune cells: inhalation (i.e. in workplaces) and intravenous injection (i.e. for biomedical applications). In both cases, the study of immune interactions through high-throughput screening and a wide variety of models (e.g. C. elegans, mice, and swine) is required to capture the emergent biological properties of graphene and other carbon materials.
And so on....
The toxicity of all these materials is obvious but is ignored by these regulatory agencies and all involved in pushing this on people.
Thank you for the bonus explanation of carbon nanotubes CNT....the abbrev. itself gives me a chuckle, but overall I think perhaps these CNTs are what is tranfecting, capable of damage in and of themselves. Perhaps, as this aligns with my personal experience of my 2019 mystery illness after exposure to someone who works with Chinese nationals at an Acupuncture school.
The utility of Carbon nanotubes in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
This review encompasses the various biosensor and nanobiosensors employed in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prime focus of this review is to summarize and critically review the recent advancements in Carbon nanotubes-based biosensors for a spectrum of uses amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
A few examples of the use of these carbon nanotubes:
This study leads to the same conclusion regarding the carcinogenic properties of carbon nanotubes.
Despite overwhelming evidence that multi-walled carbon nanotubes cause mesothelioma in the mice tested, the technology has apparently been unleashed on humans.
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date. Focusing on inhalation of nanotubes, they document evidence of transient pulmonary inflammation, and rapid and persistent development of granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis on exposure to single- and multiwalled carbon nanotubes in rodents. They cite data indicating that inhaled long and thin multiwalled carbon nanotubes can move to the lining surrounding the lungs and penetrate it, where they can potentially cause mesothelioma. Furthermore, the authors indicate that carbon nanotubes can act as a cancer promoter — with inhalation increasing the probability of developing lung cancer from exposure to other carcinogens.”
Carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon nanofibers (CNF) are commonly used in commerce, and applications are expected to increase in the near future (Zhao and Castranova 2011; De Volder et al. 2013). Since approximately 2004, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed over 60 notices for commercialization of these materials under Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act. Releases during the manufacture of these fibrous carbon nanomaterials, and during the incorporation of CNT/CNF into finished products, coupled with results from experimental animal studies showing asbestos-like effects, raised considerable human health concerns (Nowack et al. 2013).
A high dose rate and high doses may overwhelm normal defense mechanisms and thus result in significant initial pulmonary inflammation, and may also affect disposition of the administered material to secondary organs.
Pulmonary exposure to SWCNT resulted in a rapid but transient inflammatory and injury response, as evidenced by increased levels of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophils, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, and protein. Granulomas, predominantly in the terminal bronchioles, were reported 1 wk postexposure and persisted through 3 mo postexposure. A 15% rise in mortality rate within 1 d postexposure was noted and attributed to physical blockage of conducting airways by large SWCNT agglomerates. Lam et al. (2004) also reported rapid and persistent granulomas in mice after IT instillation of mice to very high doses of SWCNT (0.1–0.5 mg of SWCNT/mouse).
Mangum et al. (2006) exposed rats by pharyngeal aspiration to purified SWCNT (0.5 mg/rat; 2.6% Co and 1.7% Mo) suspended in 1% Pluronic. Data showed no apparent inflammatory responses. However, cell proliferation and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) protein levels were significantly increased 1 d postexposure and significant interstitial fibrosis was noted at 21 d postexposure. Shvedova et al. (2005) exposed mice by pharyngeal aspiration to purified SWCNT (10–40 µg/mouse). A rapid and transient inflammation and pulmonary damage were noted. In addition, granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis within 7 d postexposure, which lasted through the 59-d course of the study, were observed. Granulomas were associated with the deposition of agglomerates in the terminal bronchioles and proximal alveoli, while interstitial fibrosis was associated with deposition of more dispersed SWCNT structures in the distal alveoli.
Murray et al. (2012) compared the potency of SWCNT to crocidolite asbestos after aspiration in mice. At 1 and 7 d postexposure,
SWCNT (40 µg/mouse) were significantly more potent in inducing transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, a fibrogenic factor, than asbestos (120 µg/mouse). (!!!!!)
In addition, SWCNT were substantially more potent in inducing alveolar interstitial fibrosis as evidenced by lung collagen and alveolar wall connective tissue thickness than asbestos at 28 d postexposure. Shvedova et al. (2014) confirmed the greater fibrotic potency of SWCNT compared to asbestos at 1 year after aspiration in mice.
Recently, Shvedova et al. (2013) presented data suggesting that SWCNT may act as a cancer promoter.
However, lung tumor growth was significantly greater in mice preexposed to SWCNT as measured by the following: (1) 5-fold increase in lung weight, (2) 2.5-fold elevation in the number of visible tumors, and (3) 3-fold rise in the area of metastatic nodules. Data indicated that this tumor promotion was associated with SWCNT-induced upregulation of granulocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which would depress antitumor immunity. This may be viewed as an important hypothesis-forming study.
In summary, pulmonary exposure of mice to SWCNT induced granulomatous lesions associated with deposition of micrometer-sized agglomerates as well as rapid and progressive interstitial fibrosis associated with migration of smaller SWCNT structures into the alveolar septa.
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
On the bus today a man who got in through the back door with his suitcase trying to avoid paying, told the old white male driver that the driver was a carbon nanotube.
I'm not accustomed to men being insulted with that term. Assuming that the rough individual is up with street smart language. Spitting or coughing on someone's face is trending too.
Ha, seems like the CNTs are prolific and ubiquitious, and unisex. This knowledge is ours, but so few around me can appreciate how they are being damaged by these CNTS. My grandfather was a miner and he didn't live all that long, and here we are again but this time its more a direct war on the people. I still marvel at the depth, the effort they have gone to, to kill us. The good nature of so many people overshadowed by such outright hatred for humanity displayed by the few.
Had a video in her piece on a Hawaiian Beach giving some shameful responses to questions of school children of all ages! His advice would not be welcome around my family!
2. NOT talking about nanotechnology in these shots! I work with brilliant, strategic minds who told me that you MUST study NANOTECHNOLOGY to understand the shots…think Tracking Humans 101!
3. NOT talking about Astrid Stuckelberger, major WHO whistleblower on their goals, Karen Kingston’s work, Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea’s work (works with 26 global study/research groups)…great workers to try and save humanity! Malone is a lone wolf!
4. Malone ONLY talks about himself! Government plant!
5. 25 million dollar law suit against the good ones trying to help humanity…NOT tear them down! A gross human being! My friends do not even call the evil ones humans, but Satan and his fallen angels that God needs to take care of
ASAP!
6. I long ago looked at Malone’s wife and her fancy career in and near our government! Why? Because I always look at the spouse wondering who would be married to such a creepy guy?
Finally, Malone does NOT cut it as one who gives a damn about humanity! Maybe it is because I TRUST NO ONE unless they give me a reason to trust them! Great principle to live by!
This post is long enough such that my IMPORTANT general message today going everywhere will be posted in a separate post!
Ready to FINALLY unite with serious strategic planners to stop the continuing destruction? Reach out to Lex at his email found at the end of all his pieces to find out how to receive his information!
P.S. Personally…I have worked with Lex and the NORTH AMERICAN LAW CENTER group for 15 years and can tell you they are America’s best brilliant and strategic minds!
Malone thought that the mRNA-method was safe, so he took the first two injections himself. Then after studying the first years data, he started telling people, that based on that data, he wouldn’t recommend anyone to take mRNA-vaccines.
Nope. He didn't for children, but recomendend them for the old and vulnerables ones. Saying he took the injections doesn't mean that is true, everyone can say online whatever he wants, but it was a good entrance on the stage, based on the reaction of his public to one's experience.
Bottom line! Burn down all the bio labs and stop the injections now to stop the end of the human race!
Always worried that the horsie farm and I got jabbed too story were to sell himself as one of the guys. Sort of " I got taken too, but now I'm gonna lead you to the promised land, (while becoming the head of the "new reformed" CDC and making a shit ton of money and finally getting the recognition I crave, along with Ms Glasspool)"
I hope to be wrong, but putting two 85 year old experts critical of your work into their Deathbeds by stressing them with a 25 million dollar lawsuit makes you a scumbag in my book..
Jimychanga
100% !!!!!
Who is in their death beds.
Mal one certainly said over 60s should take the shot.
Kill off the oldies first.
Will my comment cost me $25 million.
My calculator can't deal with that many zeros.
Both Peter and Ginger Breggin are hospitalized in serious condition.
Thank you Jimmy.
I am sorry to hear that.
Awful.
Who could cope with that?
Sad indeed.
Sorry that I have not kept up with this.
Great reporting - thank you.
I don't know enough to make any technical analysis, but from when I first heard of Malone on Brett Weinstein's interview with Kirsch, it made no sense that he was an expert that developed mRNA, yet fell for the vaxx narrative.
Since then there are probably some overstatements and connections made about him that are incorrect, but many that are believable and worth asking for proper answers to.
I can see him suing the Breggins for statements he feels are damaging to him, for $1 + legal fees. When a guy with no shortage of money is suing for $25M, something is very wrong. I can only view it as a mechanism to stifle their free speech.
Despite Shannon Joy apologizing for him incessantly, he creates his own aura of dubiousness that he only has half explanations to.
Also, or being such a moral compass, he generalizes all of New York culture w/a very derogative statement - totally against what he claims are his moral pillars.
Be wary of all messengers unless you can validate their claims.
Eventually Malones masters will throw him under the bus, just as they did Charles M. Lieber. In other words Malone has failed to steer the Medical Freedom Movement in the direction his masters desired. Malones "friends" that apparently threatened he and his family, have failed to sicken or kill Malones opponents. Literally.
All to hide the Nano Technology. That's why Malone only spouts off about the mRNA, and gives no support to the truth tellers.
Malone's day of reckoning is coming, his friend's don't control the 5G or 6G anymore. No more bio drone ticks, no more spraying LNP Quantum dots, no more frequencies for modified variants.
Malone picked the wrong side, just as he did all those years ago, heading on 20 years, against me, using second hand information and Brian wave frequency data. That's what happens when you don't talk to the person involved, personally.
They can't even sue me, for the fear of discovery. So they just ignore me. Time to make more noise.
I should never read before caffeine--whats a “Brian” wave frequency I ask myself. Lmao. Seriously I am embarrassed confess....I looked it up. Note to self: finish the coffee first :)
I was almost started to "cry"....so I couldn't listen till the end. People want clicks and money (him excluded), he tried to alert people about the danger of the faccine (but recomanded for +60), everybody accuse him being part of deep state for nothing.... Malone is trying to correct the people's behaviour, an important point on the future political agenda... well, for those who didn't understand and see yet that the deep state is acting now in plain sight, all over the world, that's not good for stopping the machinery. To hell with all their faccines, malone's too, I do not have any respect and consideration for those "scientists" who put their efforts in inventing things we do not need them and experimenting on people their crazy criminal inventions.
Did anyone listen to the interview till the end?
Not me. Even at 1.5 speed.
Poor maligned malignant mal one.
The most serious side of Dr. Maligned
https://mega.nz/file/cVB3EY6I#oktagI3HilNLz7tPVaWwPxa-xXiWtcepgBYj9QxBQgw
Be sure, there is no ADE because no virus has been found. ADE fear is virus pushing propaganda.
If you inject poison, you simply destroy your immune system. Why would anyone allow themselves to inject poison? It is because of this that people cannot cope with the common cold next time and are very sick or die.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5468375/
e.g.
Sun et al. (99) demonstrated that aluminum-based adjuvants can be engineered to optimize their immunostimulatory properties. Specifically, the authors synthesized a library of aluminum oxyhydroxide (AlOOH) nanorods and compared these to commercial alum and could show that shape, crystallinity, and hydroxyl content played an important role in NLRP3 inflammasome activation (99). Rettig et al. (100) provided evidence that particle size may also influence the immune response to “danger.”
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2515-7639/ab9317
e.g.
Following exposure to GRMs or CBMs, for instance in the case of biomedical applications, the nanomaterials will immediately be recognized by immune cells, the body's first line of defence against exogenous agents. These heterogeneous materials are characterized by a variety of different physicochemical properties, which could modulate their reactivity and interactions with the immune cells [21]. This makes the assessment of their health and safety risks a challenging field and complicates the implementation in translational approaches [22–24].
In this context, the whole family of carbon nanotubes (CNTs), for years compared to asbestos for the hazardous effects shown in terms of lung toxicity [46–48], can be taken as an example. Recently CNTs have been catalogued by the Swedish non-profit organization ChemSec, as chemicals that 'should be restricted or banned in the EU' [49]. The ChemSec generalized evaluation, as highlighted by Heller et al [59] and Fadeel and Kostarelos [60] has contributed to create greater confusion regarding the much-discussed toxicological profile of this class of nanomaterials [50–56]. Indeed, it has been evidenced that, due to its extreme heterogeneity (e.g. different length, diameter, functionalization, etc) [57, 58], the family of CNTs cannot be considered as one material category [59, 60]. Hence a correct and accurate toxicological classification of CNTs and, more in general, of GRMs and CBMs, on the basis of their physicochemical properties, is of priceless importance for their safety evaluation and, consequently, their applications [61, 62].
Interactions with the immune system
The impact of nanomaterials, including graphene on human health, still need to be fully elucidated. A key aspect to ensure a safe use of nanomaterials in our everyday life and their successful applications in biomedicine is represented by the study of interaction with the complex entities of the blood immune cells. Two are the main routes of exposure that may lead to the recognition of blood immune cells: inhalation (i.e. in workplaces) and intravenous injection (i.e. for biomedical applications). In both cases, the study of immune interactions through high-throughput screening and a wide variety of models (e.g. C. elegans, mice, and swine) is required to capture the emergent biological properties of graphene and other carbon materials.
And so on....
The toxicity of all these materials is obvious but is ignored by these regulatory agencies and all involved in pushing this on people.
Thank you for the bonus explanation of carbon nanotubes CNT....the abbrev. itself gives me a chuckle, but overall I think perhaps these CNTs are what is tranfecting, capable of damage in and of themselves. Perhaps, as this aligns with my personal experience of my 2019 mystery illness after exposure to someone who works with Chinese nationals at an Acupuncture school.
The most outrages thing, these carbon nanotubes CNTs are actually used everywhere during this "pandemic"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577996/ Carbon nanotubes in COVID-19: A critical review and prospects
The utility of Carbon nanotubes in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19.
This review encompasses the various biosensor and nanobiosensors employed in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prime focus of this review is to summarize and critically review the recent advancements in Carbon nanotubes-based biosensors for a spectrum of uses amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
A few examples of the use of these carbon nanotubes:
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) face mask filters and respirator filters (https://www.graphene-info.com/israeli-researchers-develop-graphene-based-self-sterilizing-air-filter, https://www.embs.org/pulse/articles/versatile-graphene-underlies-new-covid-zapping-air-filter/, https://medium.com/edge-of-innovation/how-safe-are-graphene-based-face-masks-b88740547e8c, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=38205)
the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) personal protective equipment
nanomaterial-based biosensors, including PCR tests (https://news.mit.edu/2021/carbon-nanotube-covid-detect-1026, https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892, https://www.azonano.com/news.aspx?newsID=37676, https://www.nsmedicaldevices.com/news/graphene-sensor-covid-19-test/,https://www.azonano.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=5892)
drugs and vaccines
http://www.n3cat.upc.edu/papers/carbon%20nanotubes%20and%20cancer.pdf Carbon nanotubes introduced into the abdominal cavity of mice show asbestos-like pathogenicity in a pilot study.
This study leads to the same conclusion regarding the carcinogenic properties of carbon nanotubes.
Despite overwhelming evidence that multi-walled carbon nanotubes cause mesothelioma in the mice tested, the technology has apparently been unleashed on humans.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies
“[in 2015] Günter Oberdörster and co-authors published what is possibly the most comprehensive review of carbon nanotube toxicology studies to date. Focusing on inhalation of nanotubes, they document evidence of transient pulmonary inflammation, and rapid and persistent development of granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis on exposure to single- and multiwalled carbon nanotubes in rodents. They cite data indicating that inhaled long and thin multiwalled carbon nanotubes can move to the lining surrounding the lungs and penetrate it, where they can potentially cause mesothelioma. Furthermore, the authors indicate that carbon nanotubes can act as a cancer promoter — with inhalation increasing the probability of developing lung cancer from exposure to other carcinogens.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4706753/ INHALATION EXPOSURE TO CARBON NANOTUBES (CNT) AND CARBON NANOFIBERS (CNF): METHODOLOGY AND DOSIMETRY - PMC (nih.gov)
Carbon nanotubes (CNT) and carbon nanofibers (CNF) are commonly used in commerce, and applications are expected to increase in the near future (Zhao and Castranova 2011; De Volder et al. 2013). Since approximately 2004, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed over 60 notices for commercialization of these materials under Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act. Releases during the manufacture of these fibrous carbon nanomaterials, and during the incorporation of CNT/CNF into finished products, coupled with results from experimental animal studies showing asbestos-like effects, raised considerable human health concerns (Nowack et al. 2013).
A high dose rate and high doses may overwhelm normal defense mechanisms and thus result in significant initial pulmonary inflammation, and may also affect disposition of the administered material to secondary organs.
Pulmonary exposure to SWCNT resulted in a rapid but transient inflammatory and injury response, as evidenced by increased levels of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) neutrophils, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, and protein. Granulomas, predominantly in the terminal bronchioles, were reported 1 wk postexposure and persisted through 3 mo postexposure. A 15% rise in mortality rate within 1 d postexposure was noted and attributed to physical blockage of conducting airways by large SWCNT agglomerates. Lam et al. (2004) also reported rapid and persistent granulomas in mice after IT instillation of mice to very high doses of SWCNT (0.1–0.5 mg of SWCNT/mouse).
Mangum et al. (2006) exposed rats by pharyngeal aspiration to purified SWCNT (0.5 mg/rat; 2.6% Co and 1.7% Mo) suspended in 1% Pluronic. Data showed no apparent inflammatory responses. However, cell proliferation and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) protein levels were significantly increased 1 d postexposure and significant interstitial fibrosis was noted at 21 d postexposure. Shvedova et al. (2005) exposed mice by pharyngeal aspiration to purified SWCNT (10–40 µg/mouse). A rapid and transient inflammation and pulmonary damage were noted. In addition, granulomatous lesions and interstitial fibrosis within 7 d postexposure, which lasted through the 59-d course of the study, were observed. Granulomas were associated with the deposition of agglomerates in the terminal bronchioles and proximal alveoli, while interstitial fibrosis was associated with deposition of more dispersed SWCNT structures in the distal alveoli.
Murray et al. (2012) compared the potency of SWCNT to crocidolite asbestos after aspiration in mice. At 1 and 7 d postexposure,
SWCNT (40 µg/mouse) were significantly more potent in inducing transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, a fibrogenic factor, than asbestos (120 µg/mouse). (!!!!!)
In addition, SWCNT were substantially more potent in inducing alveolar interstitial fibrosis as evidenced by lung collagen and alveolar wall connective tissue thickness than asbestos at 28 d postexposure. Shvedova et al. (2014) confirmed the greater fibrotic potency of SWCNT compared to asbestos at 1 year after aspiration in mice.
Recently, Shvedova et al. (2013) presented data suggesting that SWCNT may act as a cancer promoter.
However, lung tumor growth was significantly greater in mice preexposed to SWCNT as measured by the following: (1) 5-fold increase in lung weight, (2) 2.5-fold elevation in the number of visible tumors, and (3) 3-fold rise in the area of metastatic nodules. Data indicated that this tumor promotion was associated with SWCNT-induced upregulation of granulocyte myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which would depress antitumor immunity. This may be viewed as an important hypothesis-forming study.
In summary, pulmonary exposure of mice to SWCNT induced granulomatous lesions associated with deposition of micrometer-sized agglomerates as well as rapid and progressive interstitial fibrosis associated with migration of smaller SWCNT structures into the alveolar septa.
Li et al. (2007a) compared the pulmonary response of mice exposed to purified MWCNT by IT instillation versus inhalation.
Intratracheal instillation produced inflammation and severe destruction of alveolar structures, while inhalation predominately resulted in moderate pathology consisting of alveolar wall thickening and cell proliferation but general alveolar structure was retained. This study demonstrated significant differences in the type and degree of pulmonary responses to MWCNT in mice between bolus-type IT instillation and inhalation, with higher doses deposited in lung by inhalation resulting in only moderate effects compared to severe lesions induced by instillation of lower doses. (!!!!!)
On the bus today a man who got in through the back door with his suitcase trying to avoid paying, told the old white male driver that the driver was a carbon nanotube.
I'm not accustomed to men being insulted with that term. Assuming that the rough individual is up with street smart language. Spitting or coughing on someone's face is trending too.
Just as well there's *no such thing as a virus*.
Ha, seems like the CNTs are prolific and ubiquitious, and unisex. This knowledge is ours, but so few around me can appreciate how they are being damaged by these CNTS. My grandfather was a miner and he didn't live all that long, and here we are again but this time its more a direct war on the people. I still marvel at the depth, the effort they have gone to, to kill us. The good nature of so many people overshadowed by such outright hatred for humanity displayed by the few.
On Malone…
1. Diana West already did a deep dive on him!
Had a video in her piece on a Hawaiian Beach giving some shameful responses to questions of school children of all ages! His advice would not be welcome around my family!
2. NOT talking about nanotechnology in these shots! I work with brilliant, strategic minds who told me that you MUST study NANOTECHNOLOGY to understand the shots…think Tracking Humans 101!
3. NOT talking about Astrid Stuckelberger, major WHO whistleblower on their goals, Karen Kingston’s work, Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea’s work (works with 26 global study/research groups)…great workers to try and save humanity! Malone is a lone wolf!
4. Malone ONLY talks about himself! Government plant!
5. 25 million dollar law suit against the good ones trying to help humanity…NOT tear them down! A gross human being! My friends do not even call the evil ones humans, but Satan and his fallen angels that God needs to take care of
ASAP!
6. I long ago looked at Malone’s wife and her fancy career in and near our government! Why? Because I always look at the spouse wondering who would be married to such a creepy guy?
Finally, Malone does NOT cut it as one who gives a damn about humanity! Maybe it is because I TRUST NO ONE unless they give me a reason to trust them! Great principle to live by!
This post is long enough such that my IMPORTANT general message today going everywhere will be posted in a separate post!
Outraged Human,
Thank you for your work helping to grow the COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION that will hopefully unite people to ACTION ASAP!
I have been working with Lex Greene for 15 years and this is my general message going out everywhere today…
I think writer, Lex Greene says it all at this moment in America’s history!
Please help spread Lex’s pieces…important information ALL Americans need to know!
https://newswithviews.com/u-s-or-them/
Ready to FINALLY unite with serious strategic planners to stop the continuing destruction? Reach out to Lex at his email found at the end of all his pieces to find out how to receive his information!
P.S. Personally…I have worked with Lex and the NORTH AMERICAN LAW CENTER group for 15 years and can tell you they are America’s best brilliant and strategic minds!
Come join with the best!
Regards,
A Mother/Grandmother Lion of 6 and counting
This is not what Malone says.
Malone thought that the mRNA-method was safe, so he took the first two injections himself. Then after studying the first years data, he started telling people, that based on that data, he wouldn’t recommend anyone to take mRNA-vaccines.
Nope. He didn't for children, but recomendend them for the old and vulnerables ones. Saying he took the injections doesn't mean that is true, everyone can say online whatever he wants, but it was a good entrance on the stage, based on the reaction of his public to one's experience.