42 Comments
User's avatar
OUTRAGED HUMAN's avatar

https://www.blumenthal.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/at-senate-commerce-hearing-blumenthal-raises-concerns-on-5g-wireless-technologys-potential-health-risks

Thursday, February 7, 2019

At Senate Commerce Hearing, Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology's Potential Health Risks

Blumenthal criticizes the FCC & FDA for inadequate answers on outstanding public health questions

Wireless carriers concede they are not aware of any independent scientific studies on safety of 5G technologies

[WASHINGTON, DC]— During today’s Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks. The full video of Blumenthal’s statement and exchange with industry representatives can be found here.

Blumenthal blasted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use—for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry.

In December 2018, Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology. At today’s hearing, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and instead, just echoing, “the general statements of the FDA, which shares regulatory responsibility for cell phones with the FCC.” Blumenthal also decried the FDA’s statements as “pretty unsatisfactory.” A PDF of Carr’s complete response is available here.

During an exchange with wireless industry representatives, Blumenthal asked them whether they have supported research on the safety of 5G technology and potential links between radiofrequency and cancer, and the industry representatives conceded they have not.

“If you go to the FDA website, there basically is a cursory and superficial citation to existing scientific data saying ‘The FDA has urged the cell phone industry to take a number of steps, including support additional research on possible biological effects of radio frequency fields for the type of signals emitted by cell phones.’ I believe that Americans deserve to know what the health effects are, not to pre-judge what scientific studies may show, and they also deserve a commitment to do the research on outstanding questions,” said Blumenthal. “So my question for you: How much money has the industry committed to supporting additional independent research—I stress independent—research? Is that independent research ongoing? Has any been completed? Where can consumers look for it? And we’re talking about research on the biological effects of this new technology.”

At the end of the exchange, Blumenthal concluded, “So there really is no research ongoing. We’re kind of flying blind here, as far as health and safety is concerned.”

In November 2018, the National Toxicology Program released the final results of the longest and most expensive study to date on cellphones and cancer. Those studies found “some evidence” of a link to cancer, at least in male rats. However, the study only focused on the risks associated with 2G and 3G cell phones. The latest 5G wireless technology relies on the deployment of many more new antennas and transmitters that are clustered lower to the ground and closer to homes and schools. There has been even more limited research with respect to the health ramifications of 5G technology, and the FCC has thus far failed to adequately explain how they have determined 5G is safe.

Expand full comment
Blue Republic's avatar

It really goes against the grain to have to agree with the likes of Blumenthal and Eshoo, but they are right to raise concerns. As some other substackers have documented, there is near zero oversight of nanotechnology and 5G has/is being rolled out with minimal attention to not-so-potential threats to privacy, health and environmental effects, etc.

Expand full comment
Gayle Wells's avatar

Like all the other hearings for theatre, it all ends right there and is meant to. They believe that the sad plebes will be satisfied it is all being taken care of.

Expand full comment
Gayle Wells's avatar

Won't let you click into the link of senate hearing from Blumenthal's own page. I'm seeing a lot of now you see it and now you don't including with interviews with Rfk Jr. especially. Harder to find or very fractured short clips.

Expand full comment
OUTRAGED HUMAN's avatar

Yes, I noticed

US Senator Blumenthal Raises Concerns on 5G Wireless Technology Health Risks at Senate Hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w

Source: U.S. Senate

During the Feb. 7th Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy, U.S. senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks.

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

Like these fuks give two shits about us. Look at it as campaigning for reelection and then the pic becomes clear...

Expand full comment
Philosopher Newport's avatar

"the final results of the longest and most expensive study to date on cellphones and cancer. Those studies found “some evidence” of a link to cancer, at least in male rats."

Just curious: Did you look at that study? Did it have a methodology section? Did you read it? Were the rats the typical multigenerational inbred lab rats? And what were the means of exposure? Did they attempt to mimic "natural" conditions and means of exposure?

Why rats and not humans? No volunteers available? Or was it because of "ethical" considerations?

Just curious, not being argumentative or accusatory: Do you usually review the methodology of a study before you conclude that its scientific method was sound & honest? Do you usually scrutinize the methodology before you cite the study as credible or meaningful evidence?

Or do you simply "trust the science" and cite a study because it seemingly supports your current point of view?

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

It has been years ago now, but I worked with people working on 5G in Japan. Truly terrifying. One application they were particularly fond of is using the IoT in work uniforms to notify management if you physically step out of line during your pre shift group stretches and exercises or afterward as you mark to your work station. If you step out of line or are out of step you will be summonses to the managers office for an interrogation. “Why did you miss a step as you marched to your work station? Too much imbibing on adult beverages last night? Enjoyed more than the recommended time of intimacy with your wife?”

They are building a living hell for as right now.

Expand full comment
Frances Leader's avatar

Cross-posted. There is so much more to 5G that anyone is being told.

Expand full comment
Marcus C Martin's avatar

A few references for agenda 1000+ for further study- Updated 5: Notes from Dystopia, Transhumanist Manifesto from Hell, Biosensors, WBAN, IEEE 802.15.6, BCI’s, Brain Initiative mechanisms, 5G-7G, Wireless Tissue Engineering, Religion of Scientism, Bioweapons, What they don’t tell you about being a human antenna- http://mcmartinreports.com/2023/07/13/scattered-notes-dystopia-transhumanist-manifesto-from-hell-religion-of-scientism-what-they-dont-tell-you/

Expand full comment
Roman S Shapoval's avatar

Most of the public still thinks wireless is safe based on tissue heating, and not biological effects. Once parents understand how much this tech impacts their children, the narrative may change:

https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/how-does-emf-affect-children

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

I remember a flurry of news/articles waaaay back when cellphones had just been marketed, about brain cancer radiation dangers.....then it just stopped being in the news. I am talking about 20 years ago. Does anyone else remember?

Expand full comment
Jeannettecally Modified's avatar

Yes. Also microchips for Pets causing huge amounts of cancer & deaths connected to radiation poisoning. We don't hear about THAT anymore either.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

Thanks, I had not heard that....poor pets, a microcosm of our ills seen in them...regret all the jabs my pets have endured over the years, shortening their life spans too...best from ORegon

Expand full comment
Angie's avatar

Intelligence agencies and their public-private partners in the military industrial pharma complex are remotely torturing and killing the animals of whistle-blowers. This is my reality.

Expand full comment
Jeannettecally Modified's avatar

I HATE this Fuggin Place! I'm so sorry that this is your reality.

Expand full comment
Monica M's avatar

Jeannettecally Modifed, I have had two pets (dogs) die from cancer...both had chips. I’m convinced the chips functioned as antennae, & they were bathed in radiation 24/7. I have so much regret over what I didn’t know then but do know now.

Expand full comment
Jeannettecally Modified's avatar

I'm so sorry Monica :( I was in the EXACT same boat. Both My puppers got cancer & were chipped. The regret is overwhelming. We now KNOW better, so we DO better.

Be well My friend.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Dec 28, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Jeannettecally Modified's avatar

I'd like the good ole days back when I was oblivious to the blatant

tyranny thrust upon us. I hadn't heard about the new Geneva mock ritual.

There is something much more ominous to this place than we think. .

Expand full comment
Kitsune, Maskless Crusader.'s avatar

We have taken the first steps into surreality. Enjoy what few freedoms you have left while they still exist.

Expand full comment
Henry's avatar

There is so much info here. I have to listen several times to hear different parts. I’m going to listen even more times and thinking to myself where is this world going. Not good it seems.It hurts but real. It’s good to be in the know.

Expand full comment
Dr. Deborah's avatar

My thoughts exactly.

Rips right into our “core” of Intelligent Creation.

We still have it no matter what the insane attempt :-)

Expand full comment
Skye's avatar

Oh how lovely .. just bring back the good old days when humans were humans who appreciated nature and the planet! This is most definitely going to not only destroy any idea of “life” you may have but it is designed to kill you! That ok with you? Sends me running to the most remote location l can find!

Expand full comment
Thegreatunwashed's avatar

Goodness! 😧

Expand full comment
rrodynmac's avatar

I agree! And am lost for words.

Expand full comment
Gayle Wells's avatar

see Sabrina Wallace on Rumble. All they have already done to hack you and failed to ask permission. She's got all the terms. The hubris of psychopaths will be their downfall. They are finding out we're not the stupid masses they thought after all.

Expand full comment
Jean-Baptiste Guillory's avatar

Absolutely, and it will be controlled by the same devils that brought the previous "revolutions." They don't stop....

Expand full comment
Dr. Deborah's avatar

Great work on all this disgusting 5G and nano

Thank You!!

We are not even being told the worst of it when it comes to so called "illness"

Here are some links from Jeromy Johnson.

He is a great help and has awesome resources to help folks .

My name is Jeromy Johnson. I have a master's degree in engineering and had a successful career in Silicon Valley before I began to experience negative health effects from wireless technology and electrical pollution.

How to Install a wired internet

https://www.emfanalysis.com/how-to-install-wired-internet-in-your-home/

This article has aged a bit, however, has some critical info. in reference to Solar Panels

Don't fall into the trap of "government solar deals" on your home.

https://www.emfanalysis.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Dark-Side-of-Solar.pdf

Expand full comment
Henry's avatar

Thank you Dr. Deborah for your input. We need more people like you to spread awareness.🙏🏻

Expand full comment
Gayle Wells's avatar

What goes up will come down as we are seeing in many nations and. neighbourhoods refusing it! Get off of your wifi and hardwire your phone. It is cheap, easy and you won't miss it. Go to Massachusetts For Safe Technology website for all you need to know. Electricians will fix you up on all of it you just need a couple of toggles, etc. People are sick because radiation sickness (feeling really tired) is cumulative and their body doesn't even get to rest in their own homes which is the most important place. Anything bluetooth and wifi can be pitched. It's simple.

Expand full comment
macDuff's avatar

and so far, the only "terroristm" we've seen has been "state sponsored terrorism" with the state being referred to being the psychopathic organization operating near the Potomac. Their only targets so far have been the American people. We see that these american people right now are far too stupid to detect that they are the targets. Many who did detect that have already been killed by this potomac based enemy, I"m thinking for example of mr. tillman the football player. Eventually americans will form real resistance to washington. It will be the few men who are remaining against surgically modified aberrations. The men will be able to take their weapons off of them and use assymetric techniques. I don't think that the u.s. army will be an impediment. I'd say the new world ODOR has already long ago planned the successors of the american military. Everything they (the bankers who own everything) are doing with the american military is done to turn it to muck. Fortunately the atom bomb is a hoax just like pathogenic virus particles and moon landings are hoaxes. They are able to turn giant buildings to fine powder in seconds, but it doesn't look easy for them. It seems they needed to get hurricane Erin right where they needed her. If the 5g is hackable, it's because they want it to be hackable. They (the bankers) are the hackers and the sponsors of the hackers. More incentive to people to stop using the future fake digital money for all but the minimum. Everybody should be buying a CNC machine and practicing. We will need to learn to make everything ourselves, and we will need to be ready to be judge, jury and executioner when the illegitimate "gov't" of the united states of america tries to come and bother us. They don't represent us. They've been criminals since George Washington died or was killed by them. If we cooperate at all, they will win. They can only win with our help.

Expand full comment
Dave Ellis's avatar

And this is Why this comes to mind. https://odysee.com/@PunkAnons:5/sabrinawallace:f

Respect & X 2 All

Expand full comment