Kind of off topic, but this disintegration technology brings to mind the 9/11 plane that went down in the field, it literally vaporized, all except a red bandana and an Islamic ID. I haven’t spent any real time investigating 9/11 but since waking up to the recent diabolical nature of govt, I plan to. Or maybe just save myself some time and go ahead and call it all corrupt at the deepest, most unbelievable level and figure out how to completely reinvent my life/world in order to rise above this darkness. I need Jesus.
> Are those self-assembling protein nanoparticles (SAPNs) used in those vaccines?
Possibly. They don't even have to make nanobots, they just have to self-assemble to make blood clots, blood clots which I think cannot be treated with current blood clot meds because they are not made of clotting factors or platelets.
Yah, they knew years before that the lipid nano particles crossed the placenta and blood brain barrier, used in cancer treatment. Then played dumb when people questioned it being in the jabbers.
Yes, it is just technology. The governments spent over 70 billion to research and develop it, so of course they decided to use it. This entire "pandemic" is of graphene toxicity poisoning, not a virus
Ok, this is all referring to a paper based on SIMULATION.😐🤨
Respectfully, please don't freak peeps out with hypothetical scenarios.
What they are talking about is purely computer modelling of a theory on what they COULD do.
And first question that pops to mind when I read the abstracts of these types of (lazy a$$) research papers ('cos you can hypothesize freaking anything in a simulation setting!), is how the #!@% do they target the Bucky bomb in a real world situation- aka a human body.??!!😐🤔🤨
This was lazy scientists half a$$ing their jobs but using the new "scientific model" to apply for research $$$.
Yep. Don't disagree re the use of nano tech usage within the defense field AND the commercial sector- bad AF news and been happening way longer than you have been talking about it, respectfully🎩🙏
Still doesn't change the fact that the paper your particularly referencing for a Substack that has "alert! alert!" screaming headlines and basically freaking people the #@!$ out, is derived from simulation data. Not real world. Not even freaking close to RL!
Just respectfully pointing out that screaming "$#@!%&" at the top of your lungs about something that is a HYPOTHESIS, not actual replicable experiment....may detract a wee bit from when you are actually screaming fire! 🤗🙏
Kind of off topic, but this disintegration technology brings to mind the 9/11 plane that went down in the field, it literally vaporized, all except a red bandana and an Islamic ID. I haven’t spent any real time investigating 9/11 but since waking up to the recent diabolical nature of govt, I plan to. Or maybe just save myself some time and go ahead and call it all corrupt at the deepest, most unbelievable level and figure out how to completely reinvent my life/world in order to rise above this darkness. I need Jesus.
Amen.
> Are those self-assembling protein nanoparticles (SAPNs) used in those vaccines?
Possibly. They don't even have to make nanobots, they just have to self-assemble to make blood clots, blood clots which I think cannot be treated with current blood clot meds because they are not made of clotting factors or platelets.
Yah, they knew years before that the lipid nano particles crossed the placenta and blood brain barrier, used in cancer treatment. Then played dumb when people questioned it being in the jabbers.
Yes, it is just technology. The governments spent over 70 billion to research and develop it, so of course they decided to use it. This entire "pandemic" is of graphene toxicity poisoning, not a virus
Ok, this is all referring to a paper based on SIMULATION.😐🤨
Respectfully, please don't freak peeps out with hypothetical scenarios.
What they are talking about is purely computer modelling of a theory on what they COULD do.
And first question that pops to mind when I read the abstracts of these types of (lazy a$$) research papers ('cos you can hypothesize freaking anything in a simulation setting!), is how the #!@% do they target the Bucky bomb in a real world situation- aka a human body.??!!😐🤔🤨
This was lazy scientists half a$$ing their jobs but using the new "scientific model" to apply for research $$$.
If so, you should read this:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/bombshell-studies
and this:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/thats-what-covid-is
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nanotechnology-and-the-new-arms-race
In addition, tons of researchers see nanotechnology in these shots.
We are talking about technology that IS being used in one way or another.
Yep. Don't disagree re the use of nano tech usage within the defense field AND the commercial sector- bad AF news and been happening way longer than you have been talking about it, respectfully🎩🙏
Still doesn't change the fact that the paper your particularly referencing for a Substack that has "alert! alert!" screaming headlines and basically freaking people the #@!$ out, is derived from simulation data. Not real world. Not even freaking close to RL!
Just respectfully pointing out that screaming "$#@!%&" at the top of your lungs about something that is a HYPOTHESIS, not actual replicable experiment....may detract a wee bit from when you are actually screaming fire! 🤗🙏
See my answer, multiple references to the use of these nanomaterials:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/marburg-or-nano-technology/comment/12825980
And also:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from