This was an interesting read. I’m not in the medical field so I had some new vocabulary words to look up. I have a family member with vax-induced ALS and a 21 year old daughter with post-Covid severe POTS. She is the only family member who never tested positive, but had the most Covid tests (allergies read the same as Covid symptoms, so...).
I wish we had more solutions to these devastating illnesses.
ALS is characterized by misfolding and aggregation of proteins such as SOD1 (familial ALS) and TDP-43.
As you can see, even from this short article:
"Damage to proteins on the surface of nanoparticles can also lead to protein unfolding.
This process can induce loss of protein function and can cause immunotoxicity. In addition, protein reconfiguration can lead to adverse effects and toxicity through activation of cell signaling pathways, loss of enzyme function, nanoparticle aggregation, formation of new antigenic sites and protein fibrillation."
According to my research, to prevent further damage, heal and maintain balance in the body, two issues must be addressed and prevented:
1. oxidative stress (through antioxidant supplementation, antioxidant diet, chelation and other detoxes) and
2. there are some products that address amyloid aggregation and affect proteins in general (such as Natto kinase, NAC and others)
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are so-called pattern recognition receptors that recognize structurally conserved molecules expressed by microbes, leading to the activation of immune responses. TLR4, the pattern recognition receptor for LPS (endotoxin), has been suggested to recognize a host of other endogenous factors, ranging from proteins to metal ions. However, direct activation of a single receptor by such a range of molecular signals is difficult to explain from a structural point of view, and care should be taken to exclude potential endotoxin contamination. On the other hand, it has been suggested that TLRs might sense the display of hydrophobic patches on a variety of molecules, which may explain the apparent promiscuity of this class of pattern recognition receptors.
We suggest that endotoxin testing should be mandatory when studying putative interactions of GO with TLRs.
Concluding Remarks
In the current essay, we have highlighted recent research on the interactions of GBMs, in particular GO, with the immune system, focusing our discussion mainly on in vitro studies. While we are far from a comprehensive understanding of these interactions, one may ask whether there are any general conclusions at this point. One technical, yet non-trivial issue when performing studies of GBMs and immune-competent cells concerns the importance of knowing not only the test material (10), and whether there are traces of endotoxin as this may impact on subsequent immune responses, but also the test system, i.e., the cell model including the composition of the cell medium, and whether this is supplemented or not with serum. Furthermore, it is important to realize that the plasma membrane is not only an impassive barrier between the interior of a cell and the extracellular space but also serves as an important platform for cellular communication between cells, and between the exterior and interior of a cell. This is true not least for immune-competent cells that are specialized in sensing and sampling their environment. It follows from this argument that the effects of a biomaterial on the cell membrane could have ramifications for immune cell communication and function. It is of interest to note that the adjuvant, alum, was previously shown to trigger responses in DCs by altering membrane lipid structures, demonstrating that not all immune signaling is receptor mediated, and suggesting that the plasma membrane could behave as a “sensor” for solid structures. Thus, the impact of a biomaterial is not necessarily linked to whether or not the material is internalized as direct effects on the plasma membrane could also come into play. In the field of nanotoxicology, much time and effort has been devoted to the determination of the dose of nanoparticles delivered to and internalized by cells, but for atomically thin materials with large lateral dimensions, some toxicological outcomes may depend on direct effects on the plasma membrane, and not only on cellular uptake of the material. In other words, as we continue to probe immunological responses toward GBMs and other 2D materials, we should not forget that significant insights may come from studying seemingly superficial interactions. Or, as actress Ava Gardner once put it, “Deep down, I’m pretty superficial.”
These indirect pathways for damage ultimately contribute to DNA lesions, double strand breaks, aneuploidy and oxidative DNA damage. Secondary genotoxicity is typically observed in vivo and is the result of DNA damage induced through a (sub)-chronic immune response, involving immune
Graphene Oxide reportedly disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the lungs and stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
GFNs (graphene-family nanoparticles) can trigger an inflammatory response and tissue injury by releasing cytokines and chemokines that lead to the recruitment of circulating monocytes and stimulating the secretion of Th1/Th2 cytokines and chemokines [124, 193]. Additionally, pristine graphene [193] and rGO [110] evoke an inflammatory response by binding to toll-like receptors (TLRs) and activating the NF-κB
signalling pathway in cells. The NF-κB signalling cascade is triggered by TLRs and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α. Upon activation, NF-κB shifts from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, facilitating the binding of degrading IκB and acting as a transcription factor to synthesize numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088662/#CR194)
Smaller-sized nanomaterials induced the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages, while PEGlayted GO did not activate this response.
However, the research by Luo et al. contradict these results (Luo et al., 2017). They found that PEGylated GO would not be internalized into cells, but would cause the release of stronger cytokines in peritoneal macrophages compared to GO. (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.01206/full)
Systemic Toxicity
As mentioned above nanoparticles may be able to translocate from the lung into the blood resulting in systemic exposure of internal organs, although the extent of this may vary. Another route of translocation from the airways may be by neuronal uptake. Inflammatory biomarkers such as Interleukin 1α (IL1α) and Tumour Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) were increased in the brain of mice exposed to ambient air particulate matter compared to controls (Campbell et al 2005). It is unknown whether this leads to potentially adverse consequences, but certainly warrants further studies. In view of the induction of inflammatory cytokines, a relation with a variety of neurological diseases might be considered. (https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/en/nanotechnologies/l-3/6-health-effects-nanoparticles.htm#3p0)
Ma et al. found that the cytotoxicity of GO depends on the size of nanoparticles. Small nanosheets of graphene enter the cells mainly by endocytosis, whereas large graphene sheets are adsorbed onto the plasma membrane. Then, they enter the cells by phagocytosis, which may lead to the enhanced production of inflammatory cytokines and recruitment of immune cells (Ma et al., 2015).
As mentioned above, particulate materials could induce inflammatory factors production, which further elicit systematic inflammatory response with enhanced cytokine production. Therefore, we could also speculate that the induction of chronic exacerbation of immune response could cause damage to layers of retinal vessels, degeneration of retinal cells, and neovascularization. For instance, studies showed that gold, silver nanoparticles, or multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) could cause increased cell apoptosis and oxidative stress in animal retinal cells or tissue. (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.201802289)
These hypotheses for adverse health effects of nanoparticles include:
Particle characteristics:
•Importance of large surface area for interactions with cells and tissues
•Complex formation with biomolecules
•Formation of increased level of radical species compared to larger particles
•Increased induction of oxidative stress
•Induction of cellular DNA damage
•Induction of oxidative stress by lipid peroxidation
Distribution
•Deposition characteristics dependent on size
•Uptake by cells of respiratory epithelium
•Increased access to interstitial spaces
•Access to systemic circulation
Organ system effects, including effects on immune and inflammatory systems
•Reduced function of macrophages, reduced phagocytosis of particles
themselves, reduced macrophage mobility and cytoskeletal dysfunction
•Increased pro-inflammatory activity and induction of cytokines and other
AuNPs, carbon-based NPs, polymeric NPs, and vesicular nanocarriers have the potential to induce cytokine and antibody responses which are dependent on their size, shape, and surface chemistry
Supporting this excellent post with a statement and useful links.
It was NEVER about health! The Powers That Should Not Be were ALWAYS about they want you DEAD or a SLAVE! This is a painful truth to accept but we the people must wake up and fight back!
There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.
How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!
RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED 'SMART' PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY!
Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos - ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al.
There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!
APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!
MAKE NY AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN!
NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY!
TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW 'SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS' FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.
NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.
STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!
NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.
Any suggestions in terms of detox or solutions? Otherwise, amazing information! Thank you Mr. Human.
Yes, more here:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/treatment-in-practice
https://outraged.substack.com/p/problem-and-solution
https://outraged.substack.com/p/dr-horowitz-treatment-protocol
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
thanks 🙏 so much - just saw your post on treatment today.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/dr-horowitz-treatment-protocol
The key is antioxidants
For detox - chlorella, fasting (on juices), sweating (including saunas), etc.
But since acute oxidative stress can be damaging, it's important to prevent oxidative damage first
Specifically infrared, if you can get it - as this improves Zeta potential (flow) in the system. Ref: A Midwestern Doctor
This was an interesting read. I’m not in the medical field so I had some new vocabulary words to look up. I have a family member with vax-induced ALS and a 21 year old daughter with post-Covid severe POTS. She is the only family member who never tested positive, but had the most Covid tests (allergies read the same as Covid symptoms, so...).
I wish we had more solutions to these devastating illnesses.
ALS is characterized by misfolding and aggregation of proteins such as SOD1 (familial ALS) and TDP-43.
As you can see, even from this short article:
"Damage to proteins on the surface of nanoparticles can also lead to protein unfolding.
This process can induce loss of protein function and can cause immunotoxicity. In addition, protein reconfiguration can lead to adverse effects and toxicity through activation of cell signaling pathways, loss of enzyme function, nanoparticle aggregation, formation of new antigenic sites and protein fibrillation."
According to my research, to prevent further damage, heal and maintain balance in the body, two issues must be addressed and prevented:
1. oxidative stress (through antioxidant supplementation, antioxidant diet, chelation and other detoxes) and
2. there are some products that address amyloid aggregation and affect proteins in general (such as Natto kinase, NAC and others)
seeing atmospheric spraying almost everyday, must be in water, food too, why isn’t there more public outrage about this?
Don’t know much about anything…
Question:
Since the NanoP’s are literally a foreign substance put INTO the closed system. ( Human Organism)
Then would the NP’s initiate an autoimmune response… (storm)
Since the NanoP’s are a foreign substance?
Is it possible the immune system is attacking foreign invaders?
Also, this:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00673/full
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are so-called pattern recognition receptors that recognize structurally conserved molecules expressed by microbes, leading to the activation of immune responses. TLR4, the pattern recognition receptor for LPS (endotoxin), has been suggested to recognize a host of other endogenous factors, ranging from proteins to metal ions. However, direct activation of a single receptor by such a range of molecular signals is difficult to explain from a structural point of view, and care should be taken to exclude potential endotoxin contamination. On the other hand, it has been suggested that TLRs might sense the display of hydrophobic patches on a variety of molecules, which may explain the apparent promiscuity of this class of pattern recognition receptors.
We suggest that endotoxin testing should be mandatory when studying putative interactions of GO with TLRs.
Concluding Remarks
In the current essay, we have highlighted recent research on the interactions of GBMs, in particular GO, with the immune system, focusing our discussion mainly on in vitro studies. While we are far from a comprehensive understanding of these interactions, one may ask whether there are any general conclusions at this point. One technical, yet non-trivial issue when performing studies of GBMs and immune-competent cells concerns the importance of knowing not only the test material (10), and whether there are traces of endotoxin as this may impact on subsequent immune responses, but also the test system, i.e., the cell model including the composition of the cell medium, and whether this is supplemented or not with serum. Furthermore, it is important to realize that the plasma membrane is not only an impassive barrier between the interior of a cell and the extracellular space but also serves as an important platform for cellular communication between cells, and between the exterior and interior of a cell. This is true not least for immune-competent cells that are specialized in sensing and sampling their environment. It follows from this argument that the effects of a biomaterial on the cell membrane could have ramifications for immune cell communication and function. It is of interest to note that the adjuvant, alum, was previously shown to trigger responses in DCs by altering membrane lipid structures, demonstrating that not all immune signaling is receptor mediated, and suggesting that the plasma membrane could behave as a “sensor” for solid structures. Thus, the impact of a biomaterial is not necessarily linked to whether or not the material is internalized as direct effects on the plasma membrane could also come into play. In the field of nanotoxicology, much time and effort has been devoted to the determination of the dose of nanoparticles delivered to and internalized by cells, but for atomically thin materials with large lateral dimensions, some toxicological outcomes may depend on direct effects on the plasma membrane, and not only on cellular uptake of the material. In other words, as we continue to probe immunological responses toward GBMs and other 2D materials, we should not forget that significant insights may come from studying seemingly superficial interactions. Or, as actress Ava Gardner once put it, “Deep down, I’m pretty superficial.”
These indirect pathways for damage ultimately contribute to DNA lesions, double strand breaks, aneuploidy and oxidative DNA damage. Secondary genotoxicity is typically observed in vivo and is the result of DNA damage induced through a (sub)-chronic immune response, involving immune
cell activation and recruitment, heightened inflammatory activity and subsequent oxidative stress, promoting genotoxicity in the surrounding epithelial cells. (https://jnanobiotechnology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12951-021-00769-9)
So yes. This applies to all vaccines, including the earlier ones. But also, to inhaled and instilled and even digested nanoparticles.
Thank you!
Graphene Oxide reportedly disrupted the alveolar-capillary barrier, allowing inflammatory cells to infiltrate into the lungs and stimulate the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
GFNs (graphene-family nanoparticles) can trigger an inflammatory response and tissue injury by releasing cytokines and chemokines that lead to the recruitment of circulating monocytes and stimulating the secretion of Th1/Th2 cytokines and chemokines [124, 193]. Additionally, pristine graphene [193] and rGO [110] evoke an inflammatory response by binding to toll-like receptors (TLRs) and activating the NF-κB
signalling pathway in cells. The NF-κB signalling cascade is triggered by TLRs and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1 and TNF-α. Upon activation, NF-κB shifts from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, facilitating the binding of degrading IκB and acting as a transcription factor to synthesize numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5088662/#CR194)
Smaller-sized nanomaterials induced the pro-inflammatory response of macrophages, while PEGlayted GO did not activate this response.
However, the research by Luo et al. contradict these results (Luo et al., 2017). They found that PEGylated GO would not be internalized into cells, but would cause the release of stronger cytokines in peritoneal macrophages compared to GO. (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2020.01206/full)
Systemic Toxicity
As mentioned above nanoparticles may be able to translocate from the lung into the blood resulting in systemic exposure of internal organs, although the extent of this may vary. Another route of translocation from the airways may be by neuronal uptake. Inflammatory biomarkers such as Interleukin 1α (IL1α) and Tumour Necrosis Factor α (TNFα) were increased in the brain of mice exposed to ambient air particulate matter compared to controls (Campbell et al 2005). It is unknown whether this leads to potentially adverse consequences, but certainly warrants further studies. In view of the induction of inflammatory cytokines, a relation with a variety of neurological diseases might be considered. (https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/en/nanotechnologies/l-3/6-health-effects-nanoparticles.htm#3p0)
Ma et al. found that the cytotoxicity of GO depends on the size of nanoparticles. Small nanosheets of graphene enter the cells mainly by endocytosis, whereas large graphene sheets are adsorbed onto the plasma membrane. Then, they enter the cells by phagocytosis, which may lead to the enhanced production of inflammatory cytokines and recruitment of immune cells (Ma et al., 2015).
Therefore, the cytotoxicity of GNPs depends on the size of the nanoparticles. (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0748233718817180#)
Nanoparticles Induced Damage on Retina
As mentioned above, particulate materials could induce inflammatory factors production, which further elicit systematic inflammatory response with enhanced cytokine production. Therefore, we could also speculate that the induction of chronic exacerbation of immune response could cause damage to layers of retinal vessels, degeneration of retinal cells, and neovascularization. For instance, studies showed that gold, silver nanoparticles, or multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) could cause increased cell apoptosis and oxidative stress in animal retinal cells or tissue. (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/advs.201802289)
These hypotheses for adverse health effects of nanoparticles include:
Particle characteristics:
•Importance of large surface area for interactions with cells and tissues
•Complex formation with biomolecules
•Formation of increased level of radical species compared to larger particles
•Increased induction of oxidative stress
•Induction of cellular DNA damage
•Induction of oxidative stress by lipid peroxidation
Distribution
•Deposition characteristics dependent on size
•Uptake by cells of respiratory epithelium
•Increased access to interstitial spaces
•Access to systemic circulation
Organ system effects, including effects on immune and inflammatory systems
•Reduced function of macrophages, reduced phagocytosis of particles
themselves, reduced macrophage mobility and cytoskeletal dysfunction
•Increased pro-inflammatory activity and induction of cytokines and other
mediators
•Adverse effects on cardiac functions and vascular homeostasis (https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/en/nanotechnologies/l-3/6-health-effects-nanoparticles.htm#3p0)
AuNPs, carbon-based NPs, polymeric NPs, and vesicular nanocarriers have the potential to induce cytokine and antibody responses which are dependent on their size, shape, and surface chemistry
And so on
I would say yes of course!
https://tritorch.com/doormat/
Supporting this excellent post with a statement and useful links.
It was NEVER about health! The Powers That Should Not Be were ALWAYS about they want you DEAD or a SLAVE! This is a painful truth to accept but we the people must wake up and fight back!
There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People.
How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY!
RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED 'SMART' PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY!
Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos - ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al.
There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!
APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!
MAKE NY AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN!
NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY!
TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW 'SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS' FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.
NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.
STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!
NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.
https://wrenchinthegears.com
https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com
https://pandemicfacts.info
https://wearehumanwearefree.org/7-days-campaign/
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/covid-19-roadmap-12-step-plan-to-create-a-totalitarian-new-world-order-were-on-number-8-headed-towards-number-9/
https://questioningcovid.com
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/
http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.html
https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/
Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com
Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire
https://www.technocracy.news
Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io
www.nojabforme.info
https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213
Links to vaccines don't work (error 404)
I can open the links, but if there is a problem there are links to this data from EudraVigilance in this article:
https://vaccineimpact.com/2023/50663-dead-and-5315063-injured-following-covid-19-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/