A bigger problem than this conversation is that THEY - and there are many of them - are not investigating the issue of nanotechnology toxicity poisoning.
If you were a prosecutor arriving at a crime scene, wouldn't you investigate all the clues and collect all the evidence?
You see, I don't buy fairy tales. I'm interested in facts. On the other hand, when people refuse to take them into account, the reason is either ignorance, the fact that they are being deceived, or that they are hiding something.
My personal opinion is she trying to "manage" the comments and prevent persons purporting theories that have either not been proven irrefutably or that she lacks the ability, in and of herself alone, to verify the theory. She is not ignoring the theory and wrote a substack talking about the subject: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide (once available to all, but now may be behind a paywall) you may be able to find searching mail on "sasha quantifoil" through others crossposting
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
Recently in a SageHana article, she sided with Robert Malone in the comments on Karen Kingston. Basically gaslighting saying she is having a psychological crisis.
IMHO, there is something not right about all of this as Outraged has indicated. After reading what she allegedly wrote at the link you provided, it didn't sound like something she as a non-biological scientist would write. Moreover, I haven't been able to find any detailed discussion by Sasha Latypova or Mike Yeadon on this topic, pro or con which I find very odd.
As I said in another comment, this strikes me as a Castle-keep strategy where the outer circles are sacrificed in order to preserve the most critical (inner circle) as if it's some kind of Holy Grail that must not be touched.
Writers seem to have been being replaced on Substack or forced into compliance. Even Mercola was targeted and successfully intimidated about 30 months ago (he wrote an article about it), after which, he became totally unreliable about "viruses" and "covid." Well, even before that, he was not exactly on top of those topics...
This might be a test for replacing an author with a bot in order to check out readers' responses. Such tests seem to have become perhaps more common than before. Here is one for comic relief:
Like you, I think the most damage comes from the NLP. Also I had doubts about the slides of pathologist with the coloured proteins, claiming that it is "The spike protein"
Some obvious problem is imo that the amount and the sizes of these nlp can vary from vial to vial and needle to needle and method of injections and the biggest problem: adults vary a lot (from 40 to 150 kg, male or female, age, illnesses.....
Here we've got 5 chemists looking into it, one of them is deeply concerned about the toxicity of the NLPs.
All these topics are never mentioned. there is a lot more left outs that I notice these days.
I think you are reading too much into this. She is a painter, and quite good I think, so if she intended to portray Malone, it would resemble him more closely.
Of course, as in all things Art, everyone is free to an individual opinion...
I've had similar exchanges with Sasha Latypova. She would consistently become incoherent in her remarks, and often belligerent and insulting, so I stopped engaging. I find her ad hominin tactics and sweeping dismissals interesting, especially since she’s always been very aggressive with such tactics. She doesn’t actually do “due diligence” when it comes to nanotech or the scientific status of viruses and virology. I’m not sure if she misleads on purpose or is just a hack researcher. Either way, you’re not alone in finding communication with Latypova to be bizarre and irrational.
Bizarre - yes; irrational, no, there's a cunning purpose to what she says/doesn't say & what she does & doesn't do; & she's not consistently good at it. However, having said that, it appears that at times she gets flustered/thrown off.... In any case, the crux of the matter is she's compromised, full stop. Nanotechnology is definitely present in the jabs, as is graphene hydroxide & much else....
I only trust what i see under my scope these days plus also what i have seen when i have taken many people to remote locations to give them their new doggy chip ID numbers or gone to the graveyards to test for myself.
I challenge anyone to explain these phenomena some other way.
Also, can anyone explain the MAC address phenomenon? I can see these addressees on my phone, using a simple Bluetooth scanner
For people near me, these numbers don't change. They always appear. Even though they don't have phones, Bluetooth devices, etc.
Why should we trust anyone who contradicts what we see or know?
Furthermore, there is a REASON for all these lies. If you look at the agenda, it is obvious that they are obsessed with microchipping people with these nano-sensors. Nothing makes sense except this FACT.
Yes, they are. We have been told for decades what they intended to do. The leaders of the world signed on to the program publicly in 1992 at the Rio Summit. Why should we not believe them in light of what they have done since then?
Something along this line... Regarding a substack article -- I don't remember the article, but it was not Sasha's -- I made a comment speculating or asking something about transhumanism. She replied to the comment that transhumanism is a "pipe dream" and something like "don't worry about it." But isn't putting chips in people basically transhumanism?
Be very suspicious of anyone who is unwilling to discuss it in detail and publicly look at the evidence. It is an attempt to gatekeep till proven otherwise, IMHO.
Yes, critical thinking. And with all due respect, I disagree with you framing it as being about a battle of arguments. It's not about argumentation... one only has to go to Rumble.com & use the search bar & use various search terms & phrases to see the facts & proof posted by many scientists, medical doctors, engineers, independent labs, etc., - it is irrefutable that there is nanotechnology, hydrogel, quantum dots, graphene hydroxide, metal fragments, parasites & more in the jabs...
Russian dissident, Lev Nazrozov, continued to warn the west until his death, on the threat of China’s military nanotechnology. He wrote many articles on the subject. I don’t think many believed him.
It appears to be their Holy Grail that must be protected at all costs. The sponsors/advocates of the bioweapon will not engage in detail on that topic. Many in the so-called MFM won't either. Instead, ad-hominem attacks and other logical fallacies are employed in order to stop open discussion. For example, referring to legitimate questions about graphene as spam, is wrong/provably false. To say there is no scientific evidence of advanced nanotechnology in the jabs is designed to end all discussion rather than to provide a detailed critique of the massive amount of evidence compiled and reported on by dozens of investigators. It is a very bad look and highly suspicious.
I think there are people who publicly claim the jabs are a bioweapon who are intentionally preventing a full discussion with respect to exactly what the bioweapon contains and how it works. It's an example of what Sage Hana refers to as Castle-keep. I have become more suspicious about this with time.
I am not judgmental of Sasha; nor do I care much about this situation.
I do have a problem that this way Sasha positions people who bring up the obvious toxicity of nanotechnology as spammers, not scientific or trolls.
And the book, if it's about toxicity of these injections, then spike protein is a hypothesis not a fact. We know perfectly well that the Pfizer representatives did not even know how much it was produced and for how long.
The amyloid plaques are formed as a result of oxidative stress, and the nanotechnology binds to proteins.
Oxidative stress is known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases. In particular, it is linked to the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an age-related neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of dementia in the elderly. Histopathological hallmarks of AD are intracellular neurofibrillary tangles and extracellular formation of senile plaques composed of the amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ) in aggregated form along with metal-ions such as copper, iron or zinc. Redox active metal ions, as for example copper, can catalyze the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) when bound to the amyloid-β (Aβ). The ROS thus produced, in particular the hydroxyl radical which is the most reactive one, may contribute to oxidative damage on both the Aβ peptide itself and on surrounding molecule (proteins, lipids, …).
And so on.
How can you say what actually is the cause of toxicity and claim that there is insufficient evidence for something else, so they will not consider it at all.
What about the masks? What about toxic PCR containing graphene and other toxic substances???
I'm not buying that narrative. THERE'S SOMETHING GROSSLY WRONG with this.
Bottom line: The medicine man believes that humans are just another source of lab animals to be used to be used to improve on God’s design! Do not tread on me!
60 minutes had a bat virus vector fear piece this Sunday to keep the masses believing they are being targeted for extermination by viral invasions jumping from animal to human! Perpetuates the need to be injected that are killing more than any other pathogen z!
Pls have a gander at this article below; plus, it's been stated by Dr. Sam Bailey, MD & others that there was never any kind of so-called "lab leak" &/or "bat virus escape from a lab" scenario - this is more obfuscating by the evil ones - including evil Fauci, to confuse & deflect attention away from the truth & the facts...& too many fall for this tactic.
This is MURDER, not a "lab leak"
People are intentionally being poisoned with nanotechnology
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LABORATORY LEAK AND A CAREFULLY PLANNED CONSPIRACY TO KILL PEOPLE, GENOCIDE - USING DEADLY NANO WEAPON.
Do you see the difference?
Excerpt:
There are a growing number of researchers and scientists who are EXPOSING the fact that "Covid" IS NOT A VIRUS.
It is an OXIDATIVE STRESS, ACUTE OXIDATIVE STRESS, which wreaks havoc on the body, causes severe damage and ultimately death due to the toxicity of the nanotechnology used.
People have been given NANO POISON in drugs, PCR tests, masks, flu vaccines, chemtrails, food, water and of course C-19 injections.
What's more, they are given this NANOTECHNOLOGY under the pretext that it will protect them, for example, that it destroys bacteria and thus viruses. How does it destroy bacteria? It cuts through them!!!...
Those who did it play dumb.
First of all, they hide what exactly they administered and why...
I never was knocked down by a virus in my life including the flu virus until I acquired the Sars II gain of function virus. Me and my partner got it at the same time! Two times! Can’t believe it only exists as a psychological weapon!
Pls consider reading some of the articles by Dr. Sam Bailey, MD, found at her Substack site. The link to her Substack is listed below & I've included 2 topics of hers, but there are many more worthwhile articles/interviews available at her site. She & her medical doctor husband Mark, are a rarity in that they have unimpeachable integrity, honesty & ethics, in my humble opinion, but you judge for yourself:
The troubling thing is that she censors. Anyone who censors is a douche bag. She calls people who have a different opinion, "spammers"? That makes whatever she says dubious now. Censors cannot be trusted. In the way things are going, we really need to sift the oats from the chaff. You censor - me say bye bye.
Indeed not. However we need to hold anyone who censors in contempt of humanity because everyone's expression is their birthright, not just hers. I call all censors douchebags and we need to come down hard on people who censor. They totally lose their credibility in my eyes. Why can't they just respond to anything they find untoward? Free speech is humanity's ONLY chance to be free. If we cannot be free in speech, there is NO WAY we can be free in any other capacity. I wish people would realize this and give anyone who censors the right feedback which is contempt. We can't be treating those who destroy our expression respect or we will be crushed.
It's peculiar how some people suddenly appear and provide groundbreaking information that was not publicly known/understood and then after a while, begin to change their attitudes/personalities/positions very subtly and as they do that, start to belittle those who have followed them. They become gatekeepers who control what is allowed to be discussed. This has to be intentional and planned as part of an overall CO/LHO, IMHO. I have seen this happen many times over the past 3.5 years and its very disconcerting.
That's an interesting observation. I don't know if when they get popular they get a lot of hubris as well, and just lose the plot or what. The cabal does get the smartest and most animated characters to be their gatekeepers. Those who don't allow criticism of their case need to be ignored. Giving them attention is what they seek, to hold us in a state of stagnation so we ourselves don't do anything. It's up to each of us now, that is the difference. Each of us must be informed and inform others, this in preparation for the next onslaught that I'm sure is pending. We can foil it. But we have to beware of gatekeepers and the only way we can discern truth from disingenuousness is that everyone upholds free speech. It is our only tool in our tool box against armies billionaires and tyrants of all varieties.
Re: "Those who don't allow criticism of their case need to be ignored." They should be but they collect a lot of followers before they begin to show their true colors. Many of their acolytes begin to hero-worship and stop thinking critically about what the hero says. It appears they know just how long to wait until they begin to censor, first subtly, then overtly. This example is probably a case in point. Censoring or giving incomplete (flip) and belittling answers spells gatekeeper to me. Also, if you comment on their stacks, watch which ones they like and don't like. It is often very enlightening.
I no longer view , read or listen to any "truther" that does not acknowledge what is so easily tested and proven at low cost by anyone who is willing to look. There is no excuse anymore.
thanks for the link. I downloaded the book and hope to read it soon.
I am not following this person and unsubscribed from a few more, some fearmongerers and others who do not get to the subject before explaining their whole life LOL
I just read an article from Geert Vanden Bosche where he states, that the injected have no immune system left and are getting sick (and die) by the numbers. Also turbo cancers are on the rise, being diagnosed and a few days later they die. Lots of sleeping illnesses awaken when the body has no resistance left. Sad. No one should have gotten this poison but most ran as if the devil was on their heels, all for something that resembles a cold...
I am in UK. This morning, out for milk early, I met a male neighbour setting off for a bike ride. He has kind of ignored me for last two years since I sent him info on jabs etc. I remarked he must be fit as a flea with all his cycling. He had to keep fit as he was diagnosed Type 2 diabetic post his jabs. He took retirement at end of 2019 just before lockdown and his cruising plans put on hold. He mentioned he was just about mateless (man mates not luurve type), losing one to heart attack, another to stroke and final one, not dead, but "turned into old man, no interest anymore to live." Wow, said I. I never have the words at the time to ask people if there was something, anything, that they'd all had that maybe facilitated these health problems.
And my friend's husband, already was Type 2 before jabs x2, so nearly 2 years since he had them, has spent last 2 weeks in hospital with out of control blood sugar, abscess on pancreas, IV one arm for anti bio, other arm saline, oxygen line too. Now requires insulin injections, still taking anti b orally. Still wiped out, no energy at all. Their neighbour, very fit retired man, suddenly has stage 4 aggressive cancer and dead within weeks. I could go on but shut eye time well overdue. Unfortunately all think jabs saved them!
Both Drs. David Nixon & Ana Mihalcea & Ricardo Delgado Martin from LaQuintaColumna have proven test results showing that insulin is contaminated with the jabs lethal contents...& it's concluded by them that one should consider ALL injectables to be thusly contaminated...
Yes, I discovered this. I'm sure people can relate to how difficult it is to persuade anyone to not take these, or anymore of them, especially with no side effects - yet apart from sore arm, headache type ones when first had them. Just making another aquaintance who got lung clot and pacemaker after her initial doses aware of all pilots and doctors affected did not put her off getting autumn booster in one arm with flu in the other! So, with my friend's husband probably coming around to thinking she was right not to get them, it is still not talked about openly. I personally believe there are many cocktails of experiments within the world guinea pig experiment. I no longer believe in contagion from alleged viruses as we are lead to believe. I have read a little of Patrick Wood's technocracy stuff and the only conclusion these jabs were pushed must be for other reasons than health, but them using health as a means of us accepting digital vaccine passports. To even start to explain transhumanism, nanorouters in the body, graphene, the Internet of Things, humans already being hackable, is even more difficult. People need the insulin. Read that it's in salts too, rock as well as cheaper table versions. To me, a newbie cons. theorist, this nano stuff is the only thing which others unwilling to talk about, explore, yet they will discuss spike protein damage until the cows come home. Surely, if they are all good guys, they would get organised and reveal all?
I'm going to be brief here. There are many ppl who are shills/puppets/controlled opposition, etc., involved in this situation & I consider you to be one of them. For you to state 2 glaring lies: that there are essentially no side effects with the jabs & to refer to spike proteins as real is all I need to draw that conclusion. I don't debate or engage in dialogue with ppl such as yourself & I will not respond to you again. Good bye.
I use 2-3000 mg of NAC per day. Especially for people who are experiencing health problems. Why? Because these are clinically relevant doses from scientific studies.
Also, Dr. Ana Mihalcea has found her therapy that she sees working.
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/162513/1/07.pdf Amyloid-Degrading Ability of Nattokinase from Bacillus subtilis Natto - After treating three different amyloid fibrils with nattokinase, the amyloid signal decreased indicating the overall ability of nattokinase to degrade amyloid. nattokinase degradation capacity.
This ability of nattokinase to degrade amyloid suggests that it may be useful in treating amyloid-related diseases.
Many proteins and peptides, such as. immunoglobin light chain, transthyretin, 2-microglobulin, serum amyloid A protein, A-peptides and insulin, can form amyloid deposits in the body. A-peptides can move from the brain into the blood with the involvement of low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein and p-glycoprotein. In addition, prion disease can be transmitted through blood transfusion, suggesting the existence of prions in the blood. Amyloid fibrils (amyloid fibrils) are insoluble and are not easily digested by proteases. The discovery of an enzyme that can be safely taken orally and can degrade amyloid fibrils could be very useful in the treatment of amyloid-related diseases. Nattokinase not only dissolved blood clots, but also degraded amyloid fibrils.
Our studies on amyloid degradation showed that it is active at neutral pH and body temperature.
Previous results in rats, dogs and humans suggested that nattokinase can enter the circulation after oral ingestion, so it has the potential to remove amyloid deposits in various parts of the body.
In addition, prion diseases can be transmitted through the use of contaminated surgical instruments. Nattokinase can tolerate temperatures of 50°C and functions even better under basic conditions such as pH 10, suggesting that it could be useful in instrument decontamination.
Further animal studies are needed to assess the therapeutic potential of nattokinase. Various amyloid fibrils can be prepared in vitro and injected into mice. Nattokinase can be administered by direct feeding of natto or nattokinase to mice or by injecting nattokinase solution into the body. The ability to degrade amyloid can be tested after an incubation period by detecting the remaining amyloid. In addition, since natto has beenconsumed by humans for a long time, it would be worthwhile to conduct an epidemiological study on the prevalence of various amyloid-related diseases in the population regularly consuming natto.
Nattokinase is a unique enzyme found to help support heart health, reduce inflammation, increase blood flow, dissolve blood clots, and extend lifespan. It’s gaining a lot of popularity as people are becoming more aware of the importance of heart health.
In 1987, Hiroyuki Sumi, a Japanese researcher, extracted an enzyme from Natto and named it Nattokinase (NK). Natto is a traditional fermented soybean food high in B vitamins, protein, and fiber. It has been used in Japan for centuries as a food and supplement. It’s one of the few supplements containing protein and peptides and is an excellent option for anti-inflammatory issues.
As you already know, inflammation is at the root of many chronic diseases and conditions. Chronic inflammation can even cause heart disease, dementia, and cancer. But if you’re looking for a natural supplement that can help reduce inflammation, you should consider adding NK to your daily health regimen.
8.9. Dosing of NAC N-acetylcysteine dosing varies significantly with various clinical studies and doses of 1200 mg daily or more are usually required to be clinically relevant.
Studies in metabolic diseases show that 5–600 mg orally per day may be sufficient to ameliorate fatty liver disease. For Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, doses of 800 mg per day seemed sufficient.
Doses as high as 1250 mg orally three times a day have been used safely in MS and showed benefit in reducing fatigue.
N-acetylcysteine appears to be well tolerated with minimal side effects when used as a supplement or in treatment of various disorders. As stated above, the dosage required for
this medication is not always clear, and there is much work needed to provide this information. A number of mechanisms of its actions are listed in Table 1. These actions provide reasoning for some of the results that are seen in so many different conditions. Many other conditions not listed in this document are emerging as understanding about NAC grows. As seen with other antioxidants in the past, there is some caution as expressed above with lung cancer models, where there may be an increase in proliferation as a result of p53 inhibition or likewise a possible increase in pulmonary hypertension.
As seen above, benefit has been shown with pulmonary, psychiatric, neurologic, metabolic, and infectious diseases, fertility issues, and some cancers. For most of these conditions, NAC can be used as an adjuvant, which may improve quality of life, morbidity, and mortality.
The use in metal toxicity and recent evidence in protecting DNA are also important. Much needs to be learned and more in vivo studies need to be performed to give us more confidence in using this simple compound.
Pls go to Dr. Mihalcea's Substack site & peruse her articles, I believe it's easy to find the ones where she mentions EDTA Chelation in the heading. It's not a pill or series of pills, it's a treatment of the blood, done over several sessions, along with high amounts of Vitamin C. You'd have to contact her for further info/details, other than what she mentions in her articles.
Also, at www.Orwell.City has many articles about antioxidants written by medical doctors & scientists, under the headings: Detox & Antioxidants, listed at the top of the main page. These articles are originally in Spanish from the wonderful ppl at LaQuintaColumna.net & have been translated by the owner of OrwellCity. I cannot personally vouch for any of the info mentioned, however. I hope you find what I've provided of help to you.
Update:
You can also check-out Canadian medical doctor, Dr. Mark Trozzi's site for antioxidant/detox methods/protocols: drtrozzi.org
Here is another source of info regarding antioxidants/detox from the jabs (bear in mind that again, I make no assertions as to what works or doesn't work). His name's Mark Trozzi & he is a Canadian medical doctor: drtrozzi.org
Yes, there's lots of "info" posted by ppl concerning antioxidants. I placed the word info in quotation marks because I cannot vouch for whether what some say works, actually works. But, having said that, & using common sense, Dr. Mihalcea has stated & shown proven results from EDTA Chelation combined with high amounts of Vitamin C...
Since oxidative stress is one of the main toxicity mechanisms of nanotechnology, antioxidants are the key. More specifically, oxygen in the cell is the key to preventing oxidative damage
Bosche is considered to be compromised too. I've been locked-out of an email account where I was keeping track of the particulars proving what I just state, so it might be a bit until I again find this irrefutable info, but I'll try...
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40846-018-0391-0 "The presence of microbubbles in the human body can be induced either through cavitation or exogenous introduction of bubbles. One of the effects of ultrasound is cavitation, or microbubble formation and collapse. Cavitation produces high pressures and temperatures, and microbubble expansion and then collapse close to cells can lead to cellular damage or hemorrhage in biological tissues."
Because a single dose of medicine requires 10 million microbubbles, it’s imperative that they be the same size, with a uniform amount of drug in each bubble. They also need to be produced quickly.
Bring in the first commercial chip-based microfluidic microbubble generating machine in the world, developed right here at Leeds. The HORIZON is portable, practical and speedy – making 109 bubbles in 3 minutes.
It comes with a plastic chip, around the size of a microscope slide, which has tiny channels engraved on it. Different constituents are sent down different channels until they self assemble around a gas bubble. Each microscopic bubble has a consistent size and dosage.
"Our machine opens boundless opportunities," says Professor Evans. "Just like what happened with computer processing, drug making will become miniaturised. Both kinds of chip have very small channels where small amounts are manipulated and controlled."
The same technology could be used, for example, for an early detection system for cancer cells or for food, cosmetics and water-based paint.
Thank you so much for explaining. I sure appreciate your response. I have been trying to comprehend and had so much difficulty. Your explanation are helping me understand so much better. I would certainly appreciate a specific report on this. I think others would as well.
With the World Health Organization wanting more people to get more jabs, what can the average person do? I live in Canada, we seem to be on the edge of crazy, daily. Our government is in the process of censoring information and news? I suspect Canada is on its way to digital identification. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Do not get any jabs of any kind - including ANY/ALL injectables - they are now all off the table, so to speak. Remember, there is an ongoing depopulation agenda & the evil Globalists will use every trick to get ppl to get injections. Their most frequently used trick is to create fear in ppl & then recommend a shot to allay that fear. The fake Marburg virus - & the shot they have for that; the fake anthrax scare - & the fake vaccine for that; the next fake variant - & the shot they'll have for that; the recent fake respiratory virus & their recommended RSV vaccine... all meant to kill you. Regarding what you mentioned about digital ID, resist - do not comply... I'll see if I can find the info I recently came across that may have more advice/suggestions & forward it to you if I find it. Scan Substack articles for articles on this topic, is what I'd suggest in the interim & also see what Catherine Austin Fitts suggests: www.Solari.com & on Gab at @CatherineAustinFitts
I am here too…. If we decide to refuse to the end (and I will by the grace of God), they will kill us after trying to forcefully re-educate us. I am pretty sure of that.
What do you think the myriad of camps all over Canada are for? These ppl - these Globalists are ruthless. Plus take a look at this excerpt from the late Dr. John Coleman's book, Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300
"...those who are obedient & subservient to the One World Govt will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for any1 who wishes to kill them... If the offense is a serious one, the digital currency will be shut off at the checking point where it is presented. Thereafter that person shall not be able to obtain food, water, shelter & employment medical services & shall be officially listed as an outlaw.
Large bands of outlaws will thus be created & they will live in regions that best afford subsistence, subject to being hunted down & shot on sight. Persons assisting outlaws in any way whatsoever, shall likewise be shot. Outlaws who fail to surrender to the police or military after a declared period of time, shall have a former family member selected at random to serve prison terms in their stead."
I'll have to find the page numbers that these excerpts are from, but here's a link to the free, online book, in its entirety:
I guess you have to feel sorry for them that they are so messed up and hate so much? They don't know what love and compassion are, it's tragic.
On the other hand, the cool thing about the material world is that everything has an end - although we grieve that pleasures end, suffering also has an end, and that's really cool.
Further to my previous comment, in short, all dissenters; all individuals refusing to be jabbed will be killed - or forcibly seized, detained & jabbed, if not worse (used for experimentation/organ harvesting, etc. & then ultimately killed.
I appreciate the links to data and context, not assuming any one aspect is entirely the one and only toxin to the exclusion of others. But I made the mistake last week of commenting to Sasha how I liked her informative article, yet didn’t understand why she’d open it with a joke (?) or snide comment about the meaning in Finnish of Kamala (as in the VP). She liked my comment then engaged in dialogue that was weirdly accusatorial and said she thought I was being sarcastic by saying I liked her post. She didn’t like that I thought she was writing to be informative... that’s why I subscribed. And she said she’d teach me a lesson and then cut me off. So I was unsubscribed.
Oh well. She says she’s going after fraudulent pharma but now ignores the military dimension of the pandemic and the dual-use tech in the counter measures... jabs.
I don’t really know who you are, or her. But the sudden cut off by her of me then you from comments...says something about her.
Perhaps we all know that directly or indirectly, the powers that be collect emails from Substacks like yours and hers to target for ‘divide and conquer operations’ run by... our bio-security’ overlords. It also shows how some are exclusionary while others are generous and inclusive.
Thanks for honest and informative writing. Both you and Sasha have readers who care to learn something personally helpful,,and find links to background references so we can check things out for ourselves too.
I find some articles and comments tedious when they perpetuate outrage with things we already know, or play up political party rhetoric. It’s just chatter that’s a time waster to some readers. Because we have to get real about how our military budget would not monopolize our economics and crowd out more humane intentions if both parties didn’t take financial advantage of their power using lowly tax payers’ money and borrow on our kids future.
I doubt that's the case in the way we would think. It could be that the evil Globalists use threats to keep their shills/puppets/controlled opposition flunkies in line. If her life was being threatened in our way of understanding it, she certainly would keep a low profile or go so low as to essentially disappear...
What would you do if your life was being threatened? I'd go so low; so underground, that I'd be disappearing myself...
From my albeit brief overview of this post, nonetheless it appears that the compromised individuals are being exposed - it appears that Sasha Latypova is one of them...even the FDA has confirmed the presence of graphene in the jabs, as did the late Dr. Andreas Noack & many, many others from many independent labs...:
Ack! Sasha has done great work unmasking the actual contracts between Pfizer and the DoD, and more. You mention a "book," what is that? Are you acquainted with Dr Ana Mihalcea and Dr David Nixon's and many others' work as shown on her Substack? Everyone can have a different take on the self-assembling nano-bots -- I personally stop before seeing an immediate threat to depopulate the whole planet! -- but certainly these things including graphene oxide, quantum dots, etc. look real enough. Those who've already made up their minds that the ONLY thing in the "vaccines" are synthetic spike proteins owe it to themselves to take a look. Unfortunately this difference of opinion reminds me of other disputes which have divided us -- whether viruses exist or not, whether climate change is real or not, etc. AS I'VE SAID NUMEROUS TIMES, to take the climate crisis, the evil-doers don't care if it's real or not, they will make use of it the same exact way through fear and manipulation -- to try and do away with us.
It's not going to work for you to try to falsely portray hard evidence by researchers as being "opinion". Obfuscating/prevaricating/double speak don't work with me... You're up to no good too...
There is a difference between nanoparticles and nanotechnology. First definition I get for nanotechnology from a search is "Nanotechnology is the manipulation of matter on a near-atomic scale to produce new structures, materials and devices." The question of whether nanotechnology occurs in all jabs (even pfizer admits they received a "special" batch for employees), is on purpose, and/or through bad manufacturing practices is still debatable from my perspective. I follow this topic loosely though, not intently. I am more concerned about people being coerced into taking risky, unproven shots, treatments, procedures, or medication through propaganda, poorly written or damaging laws, and oppressive mandates. That I don't delve into the topic of nanotech or graphene much is because I know others are covering it, and I have limited ability to prove or disprove.
On the other hand, I could see how mRNA technology on its own could fall under the umbrella of nanotechnology, so maybe nanotechnology is a given.
A bigger problem than this conversation is that THEY - and there are many of them - are not investigating the issue of nanotechnology toxicity poisoning.
If you were a prosecutor arriving at a crime scene, wouldn't you investigate all the clues and collect all the evidence?
You see, I don't buy fairy tales. I'm interested in facts. On the other hand, when people refuse to take them into account, the reason is either ignorance, the fact that they are being deceived, or that they are hiding something.
Hard Facts plus graphic proof make it easy to put this huge jigsaw puzzle together.
Taking the biggest macro view possible makes it very clear what the final picture is and sometimes I envy the blind.
Fairy tales? this is all very humpty dumpty and the kings men are busy smashing the remains to dust.
And Thank you for bringing this to my attention. it saves me wasting any more time considering her opinions.
It seems like so many of the luminaries are functioning as CO/LHO operators. It is extremely disappointing.
My personal opinion is she trying to "manage" the comments and prevent persons purporting theories that have either not been proven irrefutably or that she lacks the ability, in and of herself alone, to verify the theory. She is not ignoring the theory and wrote a substack talking about the subject: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/pfizer-evidence-of-graphene-oxide (once available to all, but now may be behind a paywall) you may be able to find searching mail on "sasha quantifoil" through others crossposting
The Jewish Vaccine: The Truth ‘Truthers’ Ignore . . . https://cwspangle.substack.com/i/126859700/the-jewish-vaccine-the-truth-truthers-ignore
Can you summarize what she said in that article as it's no longer available for free.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
A few readers asked my what my problem with Lapytova was. This article provides sufficient details.
I have also found it problematic that Katherine Watt, whose legal pieces are excellent, uses Lapytova as an authority for “medical” coverage::
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-problem-with-mrna
Recently in a SageHana article, she sided with Robert Malone in the comments on Karen Kingston. Basically gaslighting saying she is having a psychological crisis.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/when-will-they-admit-the-reason-why/comments
The subject was dropped very quickly when Latypova intervened in the comments.
IMHO, there is something not right about all of this as Outraged has indicated. After reading what she allegedly wrote at the link you provided, it didn't sound like something she as a non-biological scientist would write. Moreover, I haven't been able to find any detailed discussion by Sasha Latypova or Mike Yeadon on this topic, pro or con which I find very odd.
As I said in another comment, this strikes me as a Castle-keep strategy where the outer circles are sacrificed in order to preserve the most critical (inner circle) as if it's some kind of Holy Grail that must not be touched.
Writers seem to have been being replaced on Substack or forced into compliance. Even Mercola was targeted and successfully intimidated about 30 months ago (he wrote an article about it), after which, he became totally unreliable about "viruses" and "covid." Well, even before that, he was not exactly on top of those topics...
This might be a test for replacing an author with a bot in order to check out readers' responses. Such tests seem to have become perhaps more common than before. Here is one for comic relief:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/news-for-aprils-fools-putin-banned
Like you, I think the most damage comes from the NLP. Also I had doubts about the slides of pathologist with the coloured proteins, claiming that it is "The spike protein"
Some obvious problem is imo that the amount and the sizes of these nlp can vary from vial to vial and needle to needle and method of injections and the biggest problem: adults vary a lot (from 40 to 150 kg, male or female, age, illnesses.....
Here we've got 5 chemists looking into it, one of them is deeply concerned about the toxicity of the NLPs.
All these topics are never mentioned. there is a lot more left outs that I notice these days.
Let me change the subject slightly:
Is that RW Malone in the picture with the lions?
https://sashalatypova.faso.com/portfolio-viewer?collection=162612#lg=1&artworkId=4203295
I think you are reading too much into this. She is a painter, and quite good I think, so if she intended to portray Malone, it would resemble him more closely.
Of course, as in all things Art, everyone is free to an individual opinion...
😂
Interesting..., could very well be. If so, what's the symbolism, do you think?
I just noticed the lion constantly migrating on his background
Some are deeply involved in symbolism.
https://rumble.com/v1gpxq9-dr.-robert-malone-every-corner-you-turn-theres-bill-gates-looking-at-you-in.html
https://rumble.com/v1wy2a6-lies-the-government-told-with-dr-robert-malone.html
https://rumble.com/v32hru8-dr.-robert-malone-population-control-is-official-policy-of-us-government..html
Seems like lion means a lot to him
I think the scene is Daniel in the lion's den. I think you know
Stahhhpit! 😂😂😂😂 sure looks like him.
I've had similar exchanges with Sasha Latypova. She would consistently become incoherent in her remarks, and often belligerent and insulting, so I stopped engaging. I find her ad hominin tactics and sweeping dismissals interesting, especially since she’s always been very aggressive with such tactics. She doesn’t actually do “due diligence” when it comes to nanotech or the scientific status of viruses and virology. I’m not sure if she misleads on purpose or is just a hack researcher. Either way, you’re not alone in finding communication with Latypova to be bizarre and irrational.
Bizarre - yes; irrational, no, there's a cunning purpose to what she says/doesn't say & what she does & doesn't do; & she's not consistently good at it. However, having said that, it appears that at times she gets flustered/thrown off.... In any case, the crux of the matter is she's compromised, full stop. Nanotechnology is definitely present in the jabs, as is graphene hydroxide & much else....
After Sasha's meltdown on ProtonMagic's SS against Christine Massey, i think it's pretty obvious. Have a look for yourself at the pinned comments: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-black-hole-you-can-never-wipe
A very apt homily that should be used more often, Thanks.
Critical thinking is key.
You can't blindly believe and blindly disbelieve, it's a battle of arguments.
I'm open-minded, let them convince me that I'm wrong, for example, about nanotechnology.
I only trust what i see under my scope these days plus also what i have seen when i have taken many people to remote locations to give them their new doggy chip ID numbers or gone to the graveyards to test for myself.
I challenge anyone to explain these phenomena some other way.
From the same conversation:
OUTRAGED HUMAN
Writes OUTRAGED’s Newsletter
6 hr ago
Also, can anyone explain the MAC address phenomenon? I can see these addressees on my phone, using a simple Bluetooth scanner
For people near me, these numbers don't change. They always appear. Even though they don't have phones, Bluetooth devices, etc.
Why should we trust anyone who contradicts what we see or know?
Furthermore, there is a REASON for all these lies. If you look at the agenda, it is obvious that they are obsessed with microchipping people with these nano-sensors. Nothing makes sense except this FACT.
The evil ones are desperately trying to deny the obvious, so don't fall for any of their word salads or seemingly sophisticated denials.
Yes, they are. We have been told for decades what they intended to do. The leaders of the world signed on to the program publicly in 1992 at the Rio Summit. Why should we not believe them in light of what they have done since then?
I just did a bluetooth scan now in a hotel apartment complex. Only my phone & computer came up.
The same scan a year or two ago in another hotel had multiple devices coming up. I went outside to make sure none were mine.
This was EXACTLY the second part of my conversation with Sasha, she deleted it as the first.
I will update the main post
Something along this line... Regarding a substack article -- I don't remember the article, but it was not Sasha's -- I made a comment speculating or asking something about transhumanism. She replied to the comment that transhumanism is a "pipe dream" and something like "don't worry about it." But isn't putting chips in people basically transhumanism?
subscribing because I am doing same and have observed similar
Thank You
Be very suspicious of anyone who is unwilling to discuss it in detail and publicly look at the evidence. It is an attempt to gatekeep till proven otherwise, IMHO.
Yes, critical thinking. And with all due respect, I disagree with you framing it as being about a battle of arguments. It's not about argumentation... one only has to go to Rumble.com & use the search bar & use various search terms & phrases to see the facts & proof posted by many scientists, medical doctors, engineers, independent labs, etc., - it is irrefutable that there is nanotechnology, hydrogel, quantum dots, graphene hydroxide, metal fragments, parasites & more in the jabs...
Russian dissident, Lev Nazrozov, continued to warn the west until his death, on the threat of China’s military nanotechnology. He wrote many articles on the subject. I don’t think many believed him.
https://www.newsmax.com/navrozov/china-military/2008/12/11/id/327062/
It appears to be their Holy Grail that must be protected at all costs. The sponsors/advocates of the bioweapon will not engage in detail on that topic. Many in the so-called MFM won't either. Instead, ad-hominem attacks and other logical fallacies are employed in order to stop open discussion. For example, referring to legitimate questions about graphene as spam, is wrong/provably false. To say there is no scientific evidence of advanced nanotechnology in the jabs is designed to end all discussion rather than to provide a detailed critique of the massive amount of evidence compiled and reported on by dozens of investigators. It is a very bad look and highly suspicious.
I think there are people who publicly claim the jabs are a bioweapon who are intentionally preventing a full discussion with respect to exactly what the bioweapon contains and how it works. It's an example of what Sage Hana refers to as Castle-keep. I have become more suspicious about this with time.
I appreciate your thoughtful comment.
I am not judgmental of Sasha; nor do I care much about this situation.
I do have a problem that this way Sasha positions people who bring up the obvious toxicity of nanotechnology as spammers, not scientific or trolls.
And the book, if it's about toxicity of these injections, then spike protein is a hypothesis not a fact. We know perfectly well that the Pfizer representatives did not even know how much it was produced and for how long.
The amyloid plaques are formed as a result of oxidative stress, and the nanotechnology binds to proteins.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0013935118306935?via%3Dihub
Our work shows that graphene can induce the misfolding of prion protein and may cause the potential risk to biosystems.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680523/
Oxidative stress is known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of a number of diseases. In particular, it is linked to the etiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), an age-related neurodegenerative disease and the most common cause of dementia in the elderly. Histopathological hallmarks of AD are intracellular neurofibrillary tangles and extracellular formation of senile plaques composed of the amyloid-beta peptide (Aβ) in aggregated form along with metal-ions such as copper, iron or zinc. Redox active metal ions, as for example copper, can catalyze the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) when bound to the amyloid-β (Aβ). The ROS thus produced, in particular the hydroxyl radical which is the most reactive one, may contribute to oxidative damage on both the Aβ peptide itself and on surrounding molecule (proteins, lipids, …).
And so on.
How can you say what actually is the cause of toxicity and claim that there is insufficient evidence for something else, so they will not consider it at all.
What about the masks? What about toxic PCR containing graphene and other toxic substances???
I'm not buying that narrative. THERE'S SOMETHING GROSSLY WRONG with this.
She was unwilling to, and
tried to dissuade me, from
mentions of graphene about
4 months ago...her words were
'dont worrry about that' or such
and I just had to say, hmmmm
so I left that fold...
best
jackie in OR
REALLY...?! Well, that's VERY telling... & it tells me that she is compromised...
People who are invited to international conferences must remain suspect. It's a sad truth of the age in which we live.
Bottom line: The medicine man believes that humans are just another source of lab animals to be used to be used to improve on God’s design! Do not tread on me!
60 minutes had a bat virus vector fear piece this Sunday to keep the masses believing they are being targeted for extermination by viral invasions jumping from animal to human! Perpetuates the need to be injected that are killing more than any other pathogen z!
When I browse the news, I see most articles about catastrophes and horrors. It's kind of boring
Pls have a gander at this article below; plus, it's been stated by Dr. Sam Bailey, MD & others that there was never any kind of so-called "lab leak" &/or "bat virus escape from a lab" scenario - this is more obfuscating by the evil ones - including evil Fauci, to confuse & deflect attention away from the truth & the facts...& too many fall for this tactic.
This is MURDER, not a "lab leak"
People are intentionally being poisoned with nanotechnology
OUTRAGED HUMAN
AUG 2, 2023
https://outraged.substack.com/p/this-is-murder-not-a-lab-leak?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A LABORATORY LEAK AND A CAREFULLY PLANNED CONSPIRACY TO KILL PEOPLE, GENOCIDE - USING DEADLY NANO WEAPON.
Do you see the difference?
Excerpt:
There are a growing number of researchers and scientists who are EXPOSING the fact that "Covid" IS NOT A VIRUS.
It is an OXIDATIVE STRESS, ACUTE OXIDATIVE STRESS, which wreaks havoc on the body, causes severe damage and ultimately death due to the toxicity of the nanotechnology used.
People have been given NANO POISON in drugs, PCR tests, masks, flu vaccines, chemtrails, food, water and of course C-19 injections.
What's more, they are given this NANOTECHNOLOGY under the pretext that it will protect them, for example, that it destroys bacteria and thus viruses. How does it destroy bacteria? It cuts through them!!!...
Those who did it play dumb.
First of all, they hide what exactly they administered and why...
I never was knocked down by a virus in my life including the flu virus until I acquired the Sars II gain of function virus. Me and my partner got it at the same time! Two times! Can’t believe it only exists as a psychological weapon!
Pls consider reading some of the articles by Dr. Sam Bailey, MD, found at her Substack site. The link to her Substack is listed below & I've included 2 topics of hers, but there are many more worthwhile articles/interviews available at her site. She & her medical doctor husband Mark, are a rarity in that they have unimpeachable integrity, honesty & ethics, in my humble opinion, but you judge for yourself:
https://drsambailey.substack.com/archive?sort=new
The Origins of COVID-19
DR SAM BAILEY
MAR 21, 2023
https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/the-origins-of-covid-19
______________________
Dr. Sam Bailey, MD
JAN 18, 2022 • 13M
Gain of Function Garbage
https://drsambailey.substack.com/p/gain-of-function-garbage-4d9#details
The troubling thing is that she censors. Anyone who censors is a douche bag. She calls people who have a different opinion, "spammers"? That makes whatever she says dubious now. Censors cannot be trusted. In the way things are going, we really need to sift the oats from the chaff. You censor - me say bye bye.
She's not the only one.
Indeed not. However we need to hold anyone who censors in contempt of humanity because everyone's expression is their birthright, not just hers. I call all censors douchebags and we need to come down hard on people who censor. They totally lose their credibility in my eyes. Why can't they just respond to anything they find untoward? Free speech is humanity's ONLY chance to be free. If we cannot be free in speech, there is NO WAY we can be free in any other capacity. I wish people would realize this and give anyone who censors the right feedback which is contempt. We can't be treating those who destroy our expression respect or we will be crushed.
It's peculiar how some people suddenly appear and provide groundbreaking information that was not publicly known/understood and then after a while, begin to change their attitudes/personalities/positions very subtly and as they do that, start to belittle those who have followed them. They become gatekeepers who control what is allowed to be discussed. This has to be intentional and planned as part of an overall CO/LHO, IMHO. I have seen this happen many times over the past 3.5 years and its very disconcerting.
That's an interesting observation. I don't know if when they get popular they get a lot of hubris as well, and just lose the plot or what. The cabal does get the smartest and most animated characters to be their gatekeepers. Those who don't allow criticism of their case need to be ignored. Giving them attention is what they seek, to hold us in a state of stagnation so we ourselves don't do anything. It's up to each of us now, that is the difference. Each of us must be informed and inform others, this in preparation for the next onslaught that I'm sure is pending. We can foil it. But we have to beware of gatekeepers and the only way we can discern truth from disingenuousness is that everyone upholds free speech. It is our only tool in our tool box against armies billionaires and tyrants of all varieties.
Re: "Those who don't allow criticism of their case need to be ignored." They should be but they collect a lot of followers before they begin to show their true colors. Many of their acolytes begin to hero-worship and stop thinking critically about what the hero says. It appears they know just how long to wait until they begin to censor, first subtly, then overtly. This example is probably a case in point. Censoring or giving incomplete (flip) and belittling answers spells gatekeeper to me. Also, if you comment on their stacks, watch which ones they like and don't like. It is often very enlightening.
Another one bites the dust.
Put not your trust in princes (or princesses in this case).
Unfortunately very true.
I no longer view , read or listen to any "truther" that does not acknowledge what is so easily tested and proven at low cost by anyone who is willing to look. There is no excuse anymore.
thanks for the link. I downloaded the book and hope to read it soon.
I am not following this person and unsubscribed from a few more, some fearmongerers and others who do not get to the subject before explaining their whole life LOL
I just read an article from Geert Vanden Bosche where he states, that the injected have no immune system left and are getting sick (and die) by the numbers. Also turbo cancers are on the rise, being diagnosed and a few days later they die. Lots of sleeping illnesses awaken when the body has no resistance left. Sad. No one should have gotten this poison but most ran as if the devil was on their heels, all for something that resembles a cold...
I am in UK. This morning, out for milk early, I met a male neighbour setting off for a bike ride. He has kind of ignored me for last two years since I sent him info on jabs etc. I remarked he must be fit as a flea with all his cycling. He had to keep fit as he was diagnosed Type 2 diabetic post his jabs. He took retirement at end of 2019 just before lockdown and his cruising plans put on hold. He mentioned he was just about mateless (man mates not luurve type), losing one to heart attack, another to stroke and final one, not dead, but "turned into old man, no interest anymore to live." Wow, said I. I never have the words at the time to ask people if there was something, anything, that they'd all had that maybe facilitated these health problems.
These days I meet a lot of people who want to know how to save themselves.
Antioxidants, antioxidants, antioxidants
This is heartbreaking
And my friend's husband, already was Type 2 before jabs x2, so nearly 2 years since he had them, has spent last 2 weeks in hospital with out of control blood sugar, abscess on pancreas, IV one arm for anti bio, other arm saline, oxygen line too. Now requires insulin injections, still taking anti b orally. Still wiped out, no energy at all. Their neighbour, very fit retired man, suddenly has stage 4 aggressive cancer and dead within weeks. I could go on but shut eye time well overdue. Unfortunately all think jabs saved them!
Both Drs. David Nixon & Ana Mihalcea & Ricardo Delgado Martin from LaQuintaColumna have proven test results showing that insulin is contaminated with the jabs lethal contents...& it's concluded by them that one should consider ALL injectables to be thusly contaminated...
Yes, I discovered this. I'm sure people can relate to how difficult it is to persuade anyone to not take these, or anymore of them, especially with no side effects - yet apart from sore arm, headache type ones when first had them. Just making another aquaintance who got lung clot and pacemaker after her initial doses aware of all pilots and doctors affected did not put her off getting autumn booster in one arm with flu in the other! So, with my friend's husband probably coming around to thinking she was right not to get them, it is still not talked about openly. I personally believe there are many cocktails of experiments within the world guinea pig experiment. I no longer believe in contagion from alleged viruses as we are lead to believe. I have read a little of Patrick Wood's technocracy stuff and the only conclusion these jabs were pushed must be for other reasons than health, but them using health as a means of us accepting digital vaccine passports. To even start to explain transhumanism, nanorouters in the body, graphene, the Internet of Things, humans already being hackable, is even more difficult. People need the insulin. Read that it's in salts too, rock as well as cheaper table versions. To me, a newbie cons. theorist, this nano stuff is the only thing which others unwilling to talk about, explore, yet they will discuss spike protein damage until the cows come home. Surely, if they are all good guys, they would get organised and reveal all?
I'm going to be brief here. There are many ppl who are shills/puppets/controlled opposition, etc., involved in this situation & I consider you to be one of them. For you to state 2 glaring lies: that there are essentially no side effects with the jabs & to refer to spike proteins as real is all I need to draw that conclusion. I don't debate or engage in dialogue with ppl such as yourself & I will not respond to you again. Good bye.
Can you be more specific
please? What antioxidants, what dose?
Also, what about EDTA as advised ny Ana M? Not that I can take EDTA, I jave amalgam.
I use 2-3000 mg of NAC per day. Especially for people who are experiencing health problems. Why? Because these are clinically relevant doses from scientific studies.
Also, Dr. Ana Mihalcea has found her therapy that she sees working.
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/c19-unvaccinated-have-same-blood?publication_id=956088&post_id=134754174&isFreemail=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
I wrote more here:
https://outraged.substack.com/p/treatment-in-practice
https://outraged.substack.com/p/problem-and-solution
https://outraged.substack.com/p/dr-horowitz-treatment-protocol
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
https://outraged.substack.com/p/why-nac
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nac-as-a-chelator-for-heavy-metals
https://outraged.substack.com/p/miracle-herb-nigella-sativa
https://outraged.substack.com/p/nigella-sativa-and-honey-a-natural
and here:
http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/162513/1/07.pdf Amyloid-Degrading Ability of Nattokinase from Bacillus subtilis Natto - After treating three different amyloid fibrils with nattokinase, the amyloid signal decreased indicating the overall ability of nattokinase to degrade amyloid. nattokinase degradation capacity.
This ability of nattokinase to degrade amyloid suggests that it may be useful in treating amyloid-related diseases.
Many proteins and peptides, such as. immunoglobin light chain, transthyretin, 2-microglobulin, serum amyloid A protein, A-peptides and insulin, can form amyloid deposits in the body. A-peptides can move from the brain into the blood with the involvement of low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein and p-glycoprotein. In addition, prion disease can be transmitted through blood transfusion, suggesting the existence of prions in the blood. Amyloid fibrils (amyloid fibrils) are insoluble and are not easily digested by proteases. The discovery of an enzyme that can be safely taken orally and can degrade amyloid fibrils could be very useful in the treatment of amyloid-related diseases. Nattokinase not only dissolved blood clots, but also degraded amyloid fibrils.
Our studies on amyloid degradation showed that it is active at neutral pH and body temperature.
Previous results in rats, dogs and humans suggested that nattokinase can enter the circulation after oral ingestion, so it has the potential to remove amyloid deposits in various parts of the body.
In addition, prion diseases can be transmitted through the use of contaminated surgical instruments. Nattokinase can tolerate temperatures of 50°C and functions even better under basic conditions such as pH 10, suggesting that it could be useful in instrument decontamination.
Further animal studies are needed to assess the therapeutic potential of nattokinase. Various amyloid fibrils can be prepared in vitro and injected into mice. Nattokinase can be administered by direct feeding of natto or nattokinase to mice or by injecting nattokinase solution into the body. The ability to degrade amyloid can be tested after an incubation period by detecting the remaining amyloid. In addition, since natto has beenconsumed by humans for a long time, it would be worthwhile to conduct an epidemiological study on the prevalence of various amyloid-related diseases in the population regularly consuming natto.
Nattokinase is a unique enzyme found to help support heart health, reduce inflammation, increase blood flow, dissolve blood clots, and extend lifespan. It’s gaining a lot of popularity as people are becoming more aware of the importance of heart health.
In 1987, Hiroyuki Sumi, a Japanese researcher, extracted an enzyme from Natto and named it Nattokinase (NK). Natto is a traditional fermented soybean food high in B vitamins, protein, and fiber. It has been used in Japan for centuries as a food and supplement. It’s one of the few supplements containing protein and peptides and is an excellent option for anti-inflammatory issues.
As you already know, inflammation is at the root of many chronic diseases and conditions. Chronic inflammation can even cause heart disease, dementia, and cancer. But if you’re looking for a natural supplement that can help reduce inflammation, you should consider adding NK to your daily health regimen.
NAC:
https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/jnme/2021/9949453.pdf
8.9. Dosing of NAC N-acetylcysteine dosing varies significantly with various clinical studies and doses of 1200 mg daily or more are usually required to be clinically relevant.
Studies in metabolic diseases show that 5–600 mg orally per day may be sufficient to ameliorate fatty liver disease. For Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, doses of 800 mg per day seemed sufficient.
Doses as high as 1250 mg orally three times a day have been used safely in MS and showed benefit in reducing fatigue.
Doses of 8000 mg/day orally did not cause clinically significant reactions in HIV patients [150]. Clearly dosing is still debated and much needs to be learned in this area. https://outraged.substack.com/p/nac-as-a-chelator-for-heavy-metals
9. Discussion and Conclusion
N-acetylcysteine appears to be well tolerated with minimal side effects when used as a supplement or in treatment of various disorders. As stated above, the dosage required for
this medication is not always clear, and there is much work needed to provide this information. A number of mechanisms of its actions are listed in Table 1. These actions provide reasoning for some of the results that are seen in so many different conditions. Many other conditions not listed in this document are emerging as understanding about NAC grows. As seen with other antioxidants in the past, there is some caution as expressed above with lung cancer models, where there may be an increase in proliferation as a result of p53 inhibition or likewise a possible increase in pulmonary hypertension.
As seen above, benefit has been shown with pulmonary, psychiatric, neurologic, metabolic, and infectious diseases, fertility issues, and some cancers. For most of these conditions, NAC can be used as an adjuvant, which may improve quality of life, morbidity, and mortality.
The use in metal toxicity and recent evidence in protecting DNA are also important. Much needs to be learned and more in vivo studies need to be performed to give us more confidence in using this simple compound.
However, do not use anything blindly
Pls go to Dr. Mihalcea's Substack site & peruse her articles, I believe it's easy to find the ones where she mentions EDTA Chelation in the heading. It's not a pill or series of pills, it's a treatment of the blood, done over several sessions, along with high amounts of Vitamin C. You'd have to contact her for further info/details, other than what she mentions in her articles.
https://substack.com/@anamihalceamdphd
_________________
Also, at www.Orwell.City has many articles about antioxidants written by medical doctors & scientists, under the headings: Detox & Antioxidants, listed at the top of the main page. These articles are originally in Spanish from the wonderful ppl at LaQuintaColumna.net & have been translated by the owner of OrwellCity. I cannot personally vouch for any of the info mentioned, however. I hope you find what I've provided of help to you.
Update:
You can also check-out Canadian medical doctor, Dr. Mark Trozzi's site for antioxidant/detox methods/protocols: drtrozzi.org
Here is another source of info regarding antioxidants/detox from the jabs (bear in mind that again, I make no assertions as to what works or doesn't work). His name's Mark Trozzi & he is a Canadian medical doctor: drtrozzi.org
Yes, there's lots of "info" posted by ppl concerning antioxidants. I placed the word info in quotation marks because I cannot vouch for whether what some say works, actually works. But, having said that, & using common sense, Dr. Mihalcea has stated & shown proven results from EDTA Chelation combined with high amounts of Vitamin C...
Since oxidative stress is one of the main toxicity mechanisms of nanotechnology, antioxidants are the key. More specifically, oxygen in the cell is the key to preventing oxidative damage
There will be more of those coming soon. At least in commie Canada.
NZ too.
Bosche is considered to be compromised too. I've been locked-out of an email account where I was keeping track of the particulars proving what I just state, so it might be a bit until I again find this irrefutable info, but I'll try...
What is your experience with wireless drug delivery systems?
It is JUST technology - and this is "Marburg":
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40846-018-0391-0 "The presence of microbubbles in the human body can be induced either through cavitation or exogenous introduction of bubbles. One of the effects of ultrasound is cavitation, or microbubble formation and collapse. Cavitation produces high pressures and temperatures, and microbubble expansion and then collapse close to cells can lead to cellular damage or hemorrhage in biological tissues."
can lead to hemorrhage in biological tissues!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=WKrwdgoMUaQ&embeds_referring_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.news-medical.net%2Flife-sciences%2FWhat-are-Microbubbles.aspx&source_ve_path=Mjg2NjY&feature=emb_logo !!!!
https://www.news-medical.net/life-sciences/What-are-Microbubbles.aspx
http://web.archive.org/web/20141028130550/https://alumni.leeds.ac.uk/bubblemagic
Remember we mentioned computer chips?
Because a single dose of medicine requires 10 million microbubbles, it’s imperative that they be the same size, with a uniform amount of drug in each bubble. They also need to be produced quickly.
Bring in the first commercial chip-based microfluidic microbubble generating machine in the world, developed right here at Leeds. The HORIZON is portable, practical and speedy – making 109 bubbles in 3 minutes.
It comes with a plastic chip, around the size of a microscope slide, which has tiny channels engraved on it. Different constituents are sent down different channels until they self assemble around a gas bubble. Each microscopic bubble has a consistent size and dosage.
"Our machine opens boundless opportunities," says Professor Evans. "Just like what happened with computer processing, drug making will become miniaturised. Both kinds of chip have very small channels where small amounts are manipulated and controlled."
The same technology could be used, for example, for an early detection system for cancer cells or for food, cosmetics and water-based paint.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGjOrSDs8gI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7347315/
https://tecknexus.com/5gusecase/remote-controlled-ultrasound-scan-over-a-public-5g-network/
https://www.itv.com/news/central/2019-06-20/5g-remote-controlled-ultrasound-scans-will-save-lives-and-reduce-waiting-times
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8857403/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35182363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8764898/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006291X15007263?via%3Dihub
Thank you so much for explaining. I sure appreciate your response. I have been trying to comprehend and had so much difficulty. Your explanation are helping me understand so much better. I would certainly appreciate a specific report on this. I think others would as well.
With the World Health Organization wanting more people to get more jabs, what can the average person do? I live in Canada, we seem to be on the edge of crazy, daily. Our government is in the process of censoring information and news? I suspect Canada is on its way to digital identification. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Do not get any jabs of any kind - including ANY/ALL injectables - they are now all off the table, so to speak. Remember, there is an ongoing depopulation agenda & the evil Globalists will use every trick to get ppl to get injections. Their most frequently used trick is to create fear in ppl & then recommend a shot to allay that fear. The fake Marburg virus - & the shot they have for that; the fake anthrax scare - & the fake vaccine for that; the next fake variant - & the shot they'll have for that; the recent fake respiratory virus & their recommended RSV vaccine... all meant to kill you. Regarding what you mentioned about digital ID, resist - do not comply... I'll see if I can find the info I recently came across that may have more advice/suggestions & forward it to you if I find it. Scan Substack articles for articles on this topic, is what I'd suggest in the interim & also see what Catherine Austin Fitts suggests: www.Solari.com & on Gab at @CatherineAustinFitts
I am here too…. If we decide to refuse to the end (and I will by the grace of God), they will kill us after trying to forcefully re-educate us. I am pretty sure of that.
What do you think the myriad of camps all over Canada are for? These ppl - these Globalists are ruthless. Plus take a look at this excerpt from the late Dr. John Coleman's book, Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300
"...those who are obedient & subservient to the One World Govt will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simply be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for any1 who wishes to kill them... If the offense is a serious one, the digital currency will be shut off at the checking point where it is presented. Thereafter that person shall not be able to obtain food, water, shelter & employment medical services & shall be officially listed as an outlaw.
Large bands of outlaws will thus be created & they will live in regions that best afford subsistence, subject to being hunted down & shot on sight. Persons assisting outlaws in any way whatsoever, shall likewise be shot. Outlaws who fail to surrender to the police or military after a declared period of time, shall have a former family member selected at random to serve prison terms in their stead."
I'll have to find the page numbers that these excerpts are from, but here's a link to the free, online book, in its entirety:
https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/4A/4A92FD2FB4DAE3F773DB0B7742CF0F65_Coleman.-.CONSPIRATORS.HIERARCHY.-.THE.STORY.OF.THE.COMMITTEE.OF.300.R.pdf
I guess you have to feel sorry for them that they are so messed up and hate so much? They don't know what love and compassion are, it's tragic.
On the other hand, the cool thing about the material world is that everything has an end - although we grieve that pleasures end, suffering also has an end, and that's really cool.
I don't have any soft emotions/feelings for mass murdering psychopaths...
The evil Yuval and Herr Klaus have called the outlaws ‘feral humans’. That tells me all I need to know. Thanks for the link.
Further to my previous comment, in short, all dissenters; all individuals refusing to be jabbed will be killed - or forcibly seized, detained & jabbed, if not worse (used for experimentation/organ harvesting, etc. & then ultimately killed.
I appreciate the links to data and context, not assuming any one aspect is entirely the one and only toxin to the exclusion of others. But I made the mistake last week of commenting to Sasha how I liked her informative article, yet didn’t understand why she’d open it with a joke (?) or snide comment about the meaning in Finnish of Kamala (as in the VP). She liked my comment then engaged in dialogue that was weirdly accusatorial and said she thought I was being sarcastic by saying I liked her post. She didn’t like that I thought she was writing to be informative... that’s why I subscribed. And she said she’d teach me a lesson and then cut me off. So I was unsubscribed.
Oh well. She says she’s going after fraudulent pharma but now ignores the military dimension of the pandemic and the dual-use tech in the counter measures... jabs.
I don’t really know who you are, or her. But the sudden cut off by her of me then you from comments...says something about her.
Perhaps we all know that directly or indirectly, the powers that be collect emails from Substacks like yours and hers to target for ‘divide and conquer operations’ run by... our bio-security’ overlords. It also shows how some are exclusionary while others are generous and inclusive.
Thanks for honest and informative writing. Both you and Sasha have readers who care to learn something personally helpful,,and find links to background references so we can check things out for ourselves too.
I find some articles and comments tedious when they perpetuate outrage with things we already know, or play up political party rhetoric. It’s just chatter that’s a time waster to some readers. Because we have to get real about how our military budget would not monopolize our economics and crowd out more humane intentions if both parties didn’t take financial advantage of their power using lowly tax payers’ money and borrow on our kids future.
Maybe her life is being threatened
Thats a possibility. Where does Karen Kingston fit into all this? I sort of know someone who is very close to her.
I doubt that's the case in the way we would think. It could be that the evil Globalists use threats to keep their shills/puppets/controlled opposition flunkies in line. If her life was being threatened in our way of understanding it, she certainly would keep a low profile or go so low as to essentially disappear...
What would you do if your life was being threatened? I'd go so low; so underground, that I'd be disappearing myself...
From my albeit brief overview of this post, nonetheless it appears that the compromised individuals are being exposed - it appears that Sasha Latypova is one of them...even the FDA has confirmed the presence of graphene in the jabs, as did the late Dr. Andreas Noack & many, many others from many independent labs...:
Absolutely - and I include Malone in that group. My first thought was that Dr. Noack was murdered for a reason.
Ack! Sasha has done great work unmasking the actual contracts between Pfizer and the DoD, and more. You mention a "book," what is that? Are you acquainted with Dr Ana Mihalcea and Dr David Nixon's and many others' work as shown on her Substack? Everyone can have a different take on the self-assembling nano-bots -- I personally stop before seeing an immediate threat to depopulate the whole planet! -- but certainly these things including graphene oxide, quantum dots, etc. look real enough. Those who've already made up their minds that the ONLY thing in the "vaccines" are synthetic spike proteins owe it to themselves to take a look. Unfortunately this difference of opinion reminds me of other disputes which have divided us -- whether viruses exist or not, whether climate change is real or not, etc. AS I'VE SAID NUMEROUS TIMES, to take the climate crisis, the evil-doers don't care if it's real or not, they will make use of it the same exact way through fear and manipulation -- to try and do away with us.
It's not going to work for you to try to falsely portray hard evidence by researchers as being "opinion". Obfuscating/prevaricating/double speak don't work with me... You're up to no good too...
There is a difference between nanoparticles and nanotechnology. First definition I get for nanotechnology from a search is "Nanotechnology is the manipulation of matter on a near-atomic scale to produce new structures, materials and devices." The question of whether nanotechnology occurs in all jabs (even pfizer admits they received a "special" batch for employees), is on purpose, and/or through bad manufacturing practices is still debatable from my perspective. I follow this topic loosely though, not intently. I am more concerned about people being coerced into taking risky, unproven shots, treatments, procedures, or medication through propaganda, poorly written or damaging laws, and oppressive mandates. That I don't delve into the topic of nanotech or graphene much is because I know others are covering it, and I have limited ability to prove or disprove.
On the other hand, I could see how mRNA technology on its own could fall under the umbrella of nanotechnology, so maybe nanotechnology is a given.
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-oxide-in-pfizer